Reiman Michael, Burgi Ciara, Strube Eileen, Prue Kevin, Ray Keaton, Elliott Amanda, Goode Adam
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
J Athl Train. 2014 Nov-Dec;49(6):820-9. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.36.
To summarize and evaluate the current diagnostic accuracy of clinical measures used to diagnose Achilles tendon injuries.
A literature search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases was conducted with key words related to diagnostic accuracy and Achilles tendon injuries.
Original research articles investigating Achilles tendon injuries against an acceptable reference standard were included.
Three studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models were used to pool sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), and diagnostic odds ratios with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
The SN and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) values for Achilles tendon rupture measures ranged from 0.73 (95% CI = 0.65, 0.81) and 0.30 (95% CI = 0.23, 0.40) to 0.96 (95% CI = 0.93, 0.99) and 0.04 (95% CI = 0.02, 0.10), respectively, whereas SP and positive likelihood ratio (+LR) values ranged from 0.85 (95% CI = 0.72, 0.98) and 6.29 (95% CI = 2.33, 19.96) to 0.93 (95% CI = 0.84, 1.00) and 13.71 (95% CI = 3.54, 51.24), respectively, with the highest SN and SP both reported in the calf-squeeze test. The SN and -LR values for Achilles tendinopathy measures ranged from 0.03 (95% CI = 0.00, 0.08) and 0.97 (95% CI = not reported) to 0.89 (95% CI = 0.75, 0.98) and 0.19 (95% CI = not reported), whereas SP and +LR values ranged from 0.58 (95% CI = 0.38, 0.77) and 2.12 (95% CI = not reported) to 1.00 (95% CI = 1.00, 1.00) and infinity, respectively, with the highest SN and SP reported for morning stiffness and palpation for crepitus. Pooled analyses demonstrated similar diagnostic properties in all 3 clinical measures (arc sign, palpation, and Royal London Hospital test), with SN and -LR ranging from 0.42 (95% CI = 0.23, 0.62) and 0.68 (95% CI = 0.50, 0.93), respectively, for the arc sign, to 0.64 (95% CI = 0.44, 0.81) and 0.48 (95% CI = 0.29, 0.80), respectively, for palpation. Pooled SP and +LR ranged from 0.81 (95% CI = 0.65, 0.91) and 3.15 (95% CI = 1.61, 6.18), respectively, for palpation, to 0.88 (95% CI = 0.74, 0.96) SP for the arc sign and 3.84 (95% CI = 1.69, 8.73) +LR for the Royal London Hospital test.
Most clinical measures for Achilles tendon injury have greater diagnostic than screening capability.
总结并评估目前用于诊断跟腱损伤的临床检测方法的诊断准确性。
对MEDLINE、CINAHL和EMBASE数据库进行文献检索,检索词为与诊断准确性和跟腱损伤相关的关键词。
纳入了针对可接受参考标准调查跟腱损伤的原始研究文章。
三项研究符合纳入标准。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具进行质量评估。采用DerSimonian-Laird随机效应模型汇总敏感度(SN)、特异度(SP)以及诊断比值比及其95%置信区间(CI)。
跟腱断裂检测方法的SN和阴性似然比(-LR)值分别为0.73(95%CI = 0.65,0.81)和0.30(95%CI = 0.23,0.40)至0.96(95%CI = 0.93,0.99)和0.04(95%CI = 0.02,0.10),而SP和阳性似然比(+LR)值分别为0.85(95%CI = 0.72,0.98)和6.29(95%CI = 2.33,19.96)至0.93(95%CI = 0.84,1.00)和13.71(95%CI = 3.54,51.24),小腿挤压试验报告的SN和SP最高。跟腱病检测方法的SN和-LR值分别为0.03(95%CI = 0.00,0.08)和0.97(95%CI =未报告)至0.89(95%CI = 0.75,0.98)和0.19(95%CI =未报告),而SP和+LR值分别为0.58(95%CI = 0.38,0.77)和2.12(95%CI =未报告)至1.00(95%CI = 1.00,1.00)和无穷大,晨僵和触诊有摩擦音报告的SN和SP最高。汇总分析显示,所有三种临床检测方法(弧形征、触诊和皇家伦敦医院试验)具有相似的诊断特性,弧形征的SN和-LR分别为0.42(95%CI = 0.23,0.62)和0.68(95%CI = 0.50,0.93),触诊的SN和-LR分别为0.64(95%CI = 0.44,0.81)和0.48(95%CI = 0.29,0.80)。触诊的汇总SP和+LR分别为0.81(95%CI = 0.65,0.91)和3.15(95%CI = 1.61,6.18),弧形征的SP为0.88(95%CI = 0.74,0.96),皇家伦敦医院试验的+LR为3.84(95%CI = 1.69,8.73)。
大多数用于诊断跟腱损伤的临床检测方法具有更高的诊断能力而非筛查能力。