Suppr超能文献

人类群体间冲突与利他主义的进化相互作用:狭隘利他主义理论综述及其扩展前景

The evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: a review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension.

作者信息

Rusch Hannes

机构信息

Behavioural and Institutional Economics, JLU Giessen, Giessen, Germany Philosophy of Biology, JLU Giessen, Giessen, Germany Peter Löscher Chair of Business Ethics, TU München, Arcisstrasse 21, Munich 80333, Germany

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 7;281(1794):20141539. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1539.

Abstract

Drawing on an idea proposed by Darwin, it has recently been hypothesized that violent intergroup conflict might have played a substantial role in the evolution of human cooperativeness and altruism. The central notion of this argument, dubbed 'parochial altruism', is that the two genetic or cultural traits, aggressiveness against the out-groups and cooperativeness towards the in-group, including self-sacrificial altruistic behaviour, might have coevolved in humans. This review assesses the explanatory power of current theories of 'parochial altruism'. After a brief synopsis of the existing literature, two pitfalls in the interpretation of the most widely used models are discussed: potential direct benefits and high relatedness between group members implicitly induced by assumptions about conflict structure and frequency. Then, a number of simplifying assumptions made in the construction of these models are pointed out which currently limit their explanatory power. Next, relevant empirical evidence from several disciplines which could guide future theoretical extensions is reviewed. Finally, selected alternative accounts of evolutionary links between intergroup conflict and intragroup cooperation are briefly discussed which could be integrated with parochial altruism in the future.

摘要

基于达尔文提出的一个观点,最近有人提出假说,认为群体间的暴力冲突可能在人类合作性和利他主义的进化过程中发挥了重要作用。这一论点的核心概念被称为“狭隘利他主义”,即针对外群体的攻击性和对本群体的合作性这两种基因或文化特征,包括自我牺牲的利他行为,可能在人类中共同进化。本综述评估了当前“狭隘利他主义”理论的解释力。在对现有文献进行简要概述之后,讨论了在解释最广泛使用的模型时存在的两个陷阱:关于冲突结构和频率的假设隐含地导致的潜在直接利益以及群体成员之间的高度关联性。然后,指出了在构建这些模型时所做的一些简化假设,这些假设目前限制了它们的解释力。接下来,回顾了来自多个学科的相关实证证据,这些证据可以指导未来的理论扩展。最后,简要讨论了群体间冲突与群体内合作之间进化联系的一些替代性解释,这些解释未来可能会与狭隘利他主义相结合。

相似文献

4
The coevolution of parochial altruism and war.狭隘利他主义与战争的共同进化。
Science. 2007 Oct 26;318(5850):636-40. doi: 10.1126/science.1144237.
8
Oxytocin reactivity during intergroup conflict in wild chimpanzees.野生黑猩猩群体间冲突时的催产素反应
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 10;114(2):268-273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616812114. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
9
The evolution of intergroup cooperation.群体间合作的演变。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 10;378(1874):20220074. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0074. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

5
Super-additive cooperation.超加性合作。
Nature. 2024 Feb;626(8001):1034-1041. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07077-w. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
6
Culture and group-functional punishment behaviour.文化与群体功能性惩罚行为
Evol Hum Sci. 2022 Aug 1;4:e35. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.32. eCollection 2022.
10
Fitness consequences of outgroup conflict.异族冲突的适应后果。
Elife. 2022 Jul 14;11:e74550. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74550.

本文引用的文献

2
Evolutionary dynamics of n-player games played by relatives.亲属参与的n人博弈的进化动力学
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 31;369(1642):20130359. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0359. Print 2014 May 19.
3
Inclusive fitness: 50 years on.广义适合度:50年回顾。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 31;369(1642):20130356. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0356. Print 2014 May 19.
5
The ontogeny of the motivation that underlies in-group bias.内群体偏见基础动机的个体发生。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Apr;25(4):921-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797613516802. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
10
The collective action problem in primate territory economics.灵长类动物领域经济学中的集体行动问题。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Mar 20;280(1759):20130081. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0081. Print 2013 May 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验