Gerber David E, Laccetti Andrew L, Xuan Lei, Halm Ethan A, Pruitt Sandi L
Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center (DEG, EAH, SLP), Department of Internal Medicine (DEG, ALL, EAH), and Department of Clinical Sciences (LX, EAH, SLP), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 24;106(11). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju302. Print 2014 Nov.
In oncology clinical trials, the assumption that a prior cancer diagnosis could interfere with study conduct or outcomes results in frequent exclusion of such patients. We determined the prevalence and characteristics of this practice in lung cancer clinical trials and estimated impact on trial accrual.
We reviewed lung cancer clinical trials sponsored or endorsed by the Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group for exclusion criteria related to a prior cancer diagnosis. We estimated prevalence of prior primary cancer diagnoses among lung cancer patients using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data. We assessed the association between trial characteristics and prior cancer exclusion using chi-square analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Fifty-one clinical trials (target enrollment 13072 patients) were included. Forty-one (80%) excluded patients with a prior cancer diagnosis as follows: any prior (14%), within five years (43%), within two or three years (7%), or active cancer (16%). In SEER-Medicare data (n = 210509), 56% of prior cancers were diagnosed within five years before the lung cancer diagnosis. Across trials, the estimated number and proportion of patients excluded because of prior cancer ranged from 0-207 and 0%-18%. Prior cancer was excluded in 94% of trials with survival primary endpoints and 73% of trials with nonsurvival primary endpoints (P = .06).
A substantial proportion of patients are reflexively excluded from lung cancer clinical trials because of prior cancer. This inclusion criterion is applied widely across studies, including more than two-thirds of trials with nonsurvival endpoints. More research is needed to understand the basis and ramifications of this exclusion policy.
在肿瘤学临床试验中,先前癌症诊断可能干扰研究开展或结果的假设导致此类患者常被排除。我们确定了肺癌临床试验中这种做法的普遍性和特征,并估计了其对试验入组的影响。
我们回顾了由东部肿瘤协作组发起或认可的肺癌临床试验,以查找与先前癌症诊断相关的排除标准。我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险关联数据估计肺癌患者中先前原发性癌症诊断的普遍性。我们使用卡方分析评估试验特征与先前癌症排除之间的关联。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。
纳入了51项临床试验(目标入组13072例患者)。41项(80%)试验排除了有先前癌症诊断的患者,具体如下:任何先前癌症(14%)、五年内(43%)、两三年内(7%)或活动性癌症(16%)。在SEER-医疗保险数据(n = 210509)中,56%的先前癌症是在肺癌诊断前五年内确诊的。在各项试验中,因先前癌症被排除的患者估计数量和比例在0至207例以及0%至18%之间。94%的以生存为主要终点的试验和73%的以非生存为主要终点的试验排除了先前癌症患者(P = 0.06)。
相当一部分患者因先前患癌而被下意识地排除在肺癌临床试验之外。这一纳入标准在各项研究中广泛应用,包括超过三分之二的非生存终点试验。需要更多研究来了解这一排除政策的依据和影响。