Suppr超能文献

[用于评估沐浴水的各种微生物标志物病原体的公共卫生相关性]

[The public health relevance of various microbiologic marker pathogens for assessing bathing water].

作者信息

Müller H E

出版信息

Offentl Gesundheitswes. 1989 May;51(5):233-7.

PMID:2525691
Abstract

Regarding the quality of natural recreational water for bathing purposes, the limit values of E. coli and coliforms, faecal coliforms and totalcoliforms, respectively, laid down by the Council of the European Community, differ considerably from those prescribed by some Land Governments of the Federal Republic of Germany and by the DIN Standard Regulation No. 19643 entitled 'Processing and Disinfection of Water in Swimming Pools and Basins in Public Baths'. It must be concluded by virtue of hygienically plausible considerations, as well as for juridical reasons, that only the limit values of the EC-Code of Practice are authoritative, whereas standards of the DIN 19643, especially in respect of E. coli and coliforms, differing from the limit values of the EC-Code of Practice are not legally binding. Moreover, coliforms are not relevant for controlling swimming pools and basins in public baths. Staphylococcus aureus should therefore be investigated instead whereas other parameters such as E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and total colony counts are good markers. However, the standards of these organisms as established by the DIN 19643 are more in line with technical practibility and biased aesthetics instead of the hygienically important prinicple of commensurability.

摘要

关于用于沐浴目的的天然娱乐用水的质量,欧洲共同体理事会规定的大肠杆菌、大肠菌群、粪大肠菌群和总大肠菌群的限值,与德意志联邦共和国一些州政府以及DIN标准第19643号《公共浴场游泳池和水池的水的处理和消毒》规定的限值有很大差异。基于卫生方面合理的考虑以及法律原因,必须得出结论,只有欧洲共同体实践准则的限值具有权威性,而DIN 19643的标准,特别是在大肠杆菌和大肠菌群方面与欧洲共同体实践准则的限值不同,不具有法律约束力。此外,大肠菌群与公共浴场游泳池和水池的控制无关。因此,应改为调查金黄色葡萄球菌,而其他参数如大肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和总菌落数是很好的指标。然而,DIN 19643确定的这些生物体的标准更符合技术可行性和有偏差的美学,而不是卫生上重要的可比性原则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验