Gagliardi Anna R, Straus Sharon E, Shojania Kaveh G, Urbach David R
University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108585. eCollection 2014.
The surgical safety checklist (SSC) is meant to enhance patient safety but studies of its impact conflict. This study explored factors that influenced SSC adherence to suggest how its impact could be optimized.
Participants were recruited purposively by profession, region, hospital type and time using the SSC. They were asked to describe how the SSC was adopted, associated challenges, perceived impact, and suggestions for improving its use. Grounded theory and thematic analysis were used to collect and analyse data. Findings were interpreted using an implementation fidelity conceptual framework.
Fifty-one participants were interviewed (29 nurses, 13 surgeons, 9 anaesthetists; 18 small, 14 large and 19 teaching hospitals; 8 regions; 31 had used the SC for ≤12 months, 20 for 13+ months). The SSC was inconsistently reviewed, and often inaccurately documented as complete. Adherence was influenced by multiple issues. Extensive modification to accommodate existing practice patterns eliminated essential interaction at key time points to discuss patient management. Staff were often absent or not paying attention. They did not feel it was relevant to their work given limited evidence of its effectiveness, and because they were not engaged in its implementation. Organizations provided little support for implementation, training, monitoring and feedback, which are needed to overcome these, and other individual and team factors that challenged SSC adherence. Responses were similar across participants with different characteristics.
Multiple processes and factors influenced SSC adherence. This may explain why, in studies evaluating SSC impact, outcomes were variable. Recommendations included continuing education, time for pilot-testing, and engaging all staff in SSC review. Others may use the implementation fidelity framework to plan SSC implementation or evaluate SSC adherence. Further research is needed to establish which SSC components can be modified without compromising its effectiveness.
手术安全核对表(SSC)旨在提高患者安全,但关于其影响的研究结果相互矛盾。本研究探讨了影响SSC依从性的因素,以提出如何优化其影响的建议。
根据职业、地区、医院类型和使用SSC的时间有目的地招募参与者。要求他们描述SSC的采用方式、相关挑战、感知到的影响以及改进其使用的建议。采用扎根理论和主题分析来收集和分析数据。使用实施保真度概念框架对研究结果进行解释。
共采访了51名参与者(29名护士、13名外科医生、9名麻醉师;18家小型医院、14家大型医院和19家教学医院;8个地区;31人使用SSC的时间≤12个月,20人使用时间≥13个月)。SSC的审查不一致,且经常被不准确地记录为已完成。依从性受到多个问题的影响。为适应现有实践模式而进行的广泛修改消除了关键时间点讨论患者管理的必要互动。工作人员经常缺席或注意力不集中。鉴于其有效性的证据有限,且他们未参与其实施,他们觉得这与他们的工作无关。组织对实施、培训、监测和反馈几乎没有提供支持,而这些是克服这些问题以及其他挑战SSC依从性的个人和团队因素所必需的。不同特征的参与者的回答相似。
多个过程和因素影响了SSC的依从性。这可能解释了为什么在评估SSC影响的研究中,结果存在差异。建议包括继续教育、试点测试时间以及让所有工作人员参与SSC审查。其他人可以使用实施保真度框架来规划SSC的实施或评估SSC的依从性。需要进一步研究以确定哪些SSC组件可以在不影响其有效性的情况下进行修改。