• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

摒弃死亡器官捐献者规则?一项关于公众对死亡及器官捐献看法的全国性调查。

Abandoning the dead donor rule? A national survey of public views on death and organ donation.

作者信息

Nair-Collins Michael, Green Sydney R, Sutin Angelina R

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2015 Apr;41(4):297-302. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102229. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2014-102229
PMID:25260779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4392220/
Abstract

Brain dead organ donors are the principal source of transplantable organs. However, it is controversial whether brain death is the same as biological death. Therefore, it is unclear whether organ removal in brain death is consistent with the 'dead donor rule', which states that organ removal must not cause death. Our aim was to evaluate the public's opinion about organ removal if explicitly described as causing the death of a donor in irreversible apneic coma. We conducted a cross-sectional internet survey of the American public (n=1096). Questionnaire domains included opinions about a hypothetical scenario of organ removal described as causing the death of a patient in irreversible coma, and items measuring willingness to donate organs after death. Some 71% of the sample agreed that it should be legal for patients to donate organs in the scenario described and 67% agreed that they would want to donate organs in a similar situation. Of the 85% of the sample who agreed that they were willing to donate organs after death, 76% agreed that they would donate in the scenario of irreversible coma with organ removal causing death. There appears to be public support for organ donation in a scenario explicitly described as violating the dead donor rule. Further, most but not all people who would agree to donate when organ removal is described as occurring after death would also agree to donate when organ removal is described as causing death in irreversible coma.

摘要

脑死亡器官捐献者是可移植器官的主要来源。然而,脑死亡是否等同于生物死亡存在争议。因此,脑死亡时的器官摘除是否符合“死亡供体规则”尚不清楚,该规则规定器官摘除不得导致死亡。我们的目的是评估公众对于明确描述为导致处于不可逆呼吸暂停昏迷状态的供体死亡的器官摘除的看法。我们对美国公众进行了一项横断面网络调查(n = 1096)。问卷领域包括对一个描述为导致处于不可逆昏迷状态的患者死亡的器官摘除假设情景的看法,以及衡量死后器官捐献意愿的项目。约71%的样本同意在所述情景下患者捐献器官应属合法,67%的样本同意他们在类似情况下愿意捐献器官。在同意死后愿意捐献器官的85%的样本中,76%同意他们会在器官摘除导致死亡的不可逆昏迷情景下捐献。在一个明确描述为违反死亡供体规则的情景中,公众似乎支持器官捐献。此外,大多数(但并非全部)在器官摘除描述为在死后进行时会同意捐献的人,在器官摘除描述为导致不可逆昏迷状态下的死亡时也会同意捐献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7061/4392220/2663861bda06/medethics-2014-102229f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7061/4392220/2663861bda06/medethics-2014-102229f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7061/4392220/2663861bda06/medethics-2014-102229f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Abandoning the dead donor rule? A national survey of public views on death and organ donation.摒弃死亡器官捐献者规则?一项关于公众对死亡及器官捐献看法的全国性调查。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Apr;41(4):297-302. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102229. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
2
Death and organ procurement: public beliefs and attitudes.死亡与器官获取:公众的信念与态度
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004 Sep;14(3):217-34. doi: 10.1353/ken.2004.0034.
3
Abandon the dead donor rule or change the definition of death?放弃死亡器官捐献规则还是改变死亡的定义?
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004 Sep;14(3):261-76. doi: 10.1353/ken.2004.0035.
4
Death and organ procurement: public beliefs and attitudes.死亡与器官获取:公众的观念与态度
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Dec;59(11):2325-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.029.
5
A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy.关于公众对脑死亡和重要器官移植态度的实证证据的叙述性综述:需要更好的数据为政策提供信息。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Apr;41(4):291-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101930. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
6
Public Opinion on Organ Donation After Death and Its Influence on Attitudes Toward Organ Donation.公众对死后器官捐赠的看法及其对器官捐赠态度的影响。
Ann Transplant. 2016 Aug 18;21:516-24. doi: 10.12659/aot.899268.
7
Determinants of willingness to donate living related and cadaveric organs: identifying opportunities for intervention.活体亲属供体和尸体供体器官捐赠意愿的决定因素:确定干预机会
Transplantation. 2002 May 27;73(10):1683-91. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200205270-00029.
8
Reconsidering the dead donor rule: is it important that organ donors be dead?重新审视死亡器官捐献规则:器官捐献者必须是死者这一点重要吗?
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004 Sep;14(3):249-60. doi: 10.1353/ken.2004.0030.
9
Reevaluating the dead donor rule.重新评估死亡捐献者规则。
J Med Philos. 2010 Apr;35(2):154-79. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq009. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
10
Attitudes toward death criteria and organ donation among healthcare personnel and the general public.医护人员和普通公众对死亡标准及器官捐赠的态度。
Prog Transplant. 2006 Mar;16(1):65-73. doi: 10.1177/152692480601600113.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of brain death and barriers to organ donation in north African intensive care units: a multicenter prospective study on severe coma patients.北非重症监护病房中脑死亡的预测因素及器官捐献的障碍:一项针对严重昏迷患者的多中心前瞻性研究
Libyan J Med. 2025 Dec;20(1):2545049. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2025.2545049. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
2
Knowledge gaps in heart and lung donation after the circulatory determination of death: Report of a workshop of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.循环判定死亡后心肺捐赠方面的知识空白:美国国立心肺血液研究所研讨会报告
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jun;43(6):1021-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.02.1455. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy.关于公众对脑死亡和重要器官移植态度的实证证据的叙述性综述:需要更好的数据为政策提供信息。
J Med Ethics. 2015 Apr;41(4):291-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101930. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
2
Accepting brain death.接受脑死亡。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):891-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1400930. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
3
Life or death for the dead-donor rule?死体器官捐赠规则的生死存亡?
Death pluralism: a proposal.
死亡多元论:一种建议。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2023 Aug 2;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13010-023-00139-3.
4
What Is the Ideal Brain Criterion of Death? Clinical and Practical Considerations: The UDDA Revision Series.理想的脑死亡判定标准是什么?临床与实践考量:《统一死亡判定法案》修订系列
Neurology. 2023 Jul 11;101(2):83-85. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207335.
5
Death as the Cessation of an Organism and the Moral Status Alternative.死亡作为生物体的终止和替代道德地位。
J Med Philos. 2023 Sep 14;48(5):504-518. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhad018.
6
A scoping review of the perceptions of death in the context of organ donation and transplantation.器官捐献与移植背景下死亡认知的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 18;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00734-z.
7
A Framework for Revisiting Brain Death: Evaluating Awareness and Attitudes Toward the Neuroscientific and Ethical Debate Around the American Academy of Neurology Brain Death Criteria.重新审视脑死亡的框架:评估对美国神经病学学会脑死亡标准的神经科学和伦理辩论的意识和态度。
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):1149-1166. doi: 10.1177/0885066620985827. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?《统一死亡判定法案》是否需要修订?
Linacre Q. 2020 Aug;87(3):317-333. doi: 10.1177/0024363920926018. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
9
Minds, brains, and hearts: an empirical study on pluralism concerning death determination.心智、大脑与心脏:关于死亡判定多元论的实证研究
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2020 May;38(1):35-48. doi: 10.1007/s40592-020-00114-0.
10
Cardiac donation after circulatory death: the heart of the matter.循环性死亡后的心脏捐赠:问题的核心
Can J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;67(3):281-285. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01561-y. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1289-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1308078.
4
Brain death, paternalism, and the language of "death".脑死亡、家长式作风与“死亡”的表述
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2013 Mar;23(1):53-104. doi: 10.1353/ken.2013.0002.
5
Can we handle the truth? Legal fictions in the determination of death.我们能直面真相吗?死亡判定中的法律拟制。
Am J Law Med. 2010;36(4):540-85. doi: 10.1177/009885881003600402.
6
Death, brain death, and the limits of science: why the whole-brain concept of death is a flawed public policy.死亡、脑死亡与科学的局限:为何全脑死亡概念是有缺陷的公共政策。
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Fall;38(3):667-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00520.x.
7
A matter of respect: a defense of the dead donor rule and of a "whole-brain" criterion for determination of death.关乎尊重:对死亡捐赠者规则及“全脑”死亡判定标准的辩护
J Med Philos. 2010 Jun;35(3):330-64. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq023. Epub 2010 May 13.
8
The acquiescence effect in responding to a questionnaire.问卷调查中的默认效应。
Psychosoc Med. 2007 Jun 20;4:Doc07.
9
The whole-brain concept of death remains optimum public policy.全脑死亡概念仍然是最佳的公共政策。
J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Spring;34(1):35-43, 3. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00006.x.
10
A scale to assess attitudes toward euthanasia.一种评估对安乐死态度的量表。
Omega (Westport). 2005;51(3):229-37. doi: 10.2190/FGHE-YXHX-QJEA-MTM0.