Algarni A S, Ghorbel S, Jones J G, Guermazi M
General Administration of Medical Rehabilitation, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Bangor University, School of Sport, Health and Exercise Sciences, UK.
Rehabilition Department King Fahd Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Faculté de médecine de Tunis, université Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Dec;57(9-10):653-63. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
The aim of this study was to adapt and validate the Tunisian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) within a Saudi Arabian population.
The translation of items 8 and 10 taken out of the Tunisian version was conducted according to Beaton's method. Adaptations were made after a pilot study on 100 patients. The validation study included 100 patients suffering from chronic low back pain aged 18 to 65 years old. Intra-observer reliability was assessed using the intra-class coefficient (ICC). Spearman rank correlation coefficient, the Kruskall-Wallis test and factor analysis were used to evaluate construct validity (convergent and divergent validity). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
One hundred Saudi patients were included in the study. Intra-observer reliability was excellent (ICC: 0.99). The correlations of the index with the VAS pain scale (r=0.708), the Roland-Morris Low Back Pain Disability (r=0.656), and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (r=0.792) suggest good construct validity. Factor analysis unveiled two main factors explaining a cumulative percentage variance of 63.5%. The first factor represents static activities and the second factor represents dynamic activities.
The Arabic version of the ODI adapted to the Saudi population has high metrological qualities. Further studies assessing its responsiveness to change should be conducted.
本研究旨在使突尼斯版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(ODI)适用于沙特人群并进行验证。
按照比顿方法对突尼斯版第8项和第10项进行翻译。在对100名患者进行预试验后进行了调整。验证研究纳入了100名年龄在18至65岁之间的慢性下腰痛患者。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者内信度。采用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和因子分析来评估结构效度(收敛效度和区分效度)。通过克朗巴赫α系数评估内部一致性。
100名沙特患者纳入研究。观察者内信度极佳(ICC:0.99)。该指数与视觉模拟疼痛量表(r = 0.708)、罗兰-莫里斯下腰痛功能障碍量表(r = 0.656)和魁北克下腰痛功能障碍量表(r = 0.792)的相关性表明具有良好的结构效度。因子分析揭示了两个主要因子,解释了累积方差百分比为63.5%。第一个因子代表静态活动,第二个因子代表动态活动。
适用于沙特人群的阿拉伯语版ODI具有较高的计量学质量。应开展进一步研究评估其对变化的反应性。