Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Mar;21(3):1066-77. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12721. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate-vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or replacing because they were not developed to explicitly consider climate change. However, no assessment approach has been tested to determine its ability to provide advanced warning time for conservation action for species that might go extinct due to climate change. To test the performance of the Red List system in this capacity, we used linked niche-demographic models with habitat dynamics driven by a 'business-as-usual' climate change scenario. We generated replicate 100-year trajectories for range-restricted reptiles and amphibians endemic to the United States. For each replicate, we categorized the simulated species according to IUCN Red List criteria at annual, 5-year, and 10-year intervals (the latter representing current practice). For replicates that went extinct, we calculated warning time as the number of years the simulated species was continuously listed in a threatened category prior to extinction. To simulate data limitations, we repeated the analysis using a single criterion at a time (disregarding other listing criteria). Results show that when all criteria can be used, the Red List system would provide several decades of warning time (median = 62 years; >20 years for 99% of replicates), but suggest that conservation actions should begin as soon as a species is listed as Vulnerable, because 50% of replicates went extinct within 20 years of becoming uplisted to Critically Endangered. When only one criterion was used, warning times were substantially shorter, but more frequent assessments increased the warning time by about a decade. Overall, we found that the Red List criteria reliably provide a sensitive and precautionary way to assess extinction risk under climate change.
气候变化可能成为减缓物种灭绝速度的一个日益严重的障碍。已经提出了几种新的评估方法来识别对气候敏感的物种,这些方法基于这样一种假设,即现有的系统(如 IUCN 红色名录)需要修订或取代,因为它们不是为了明确考虑气候变化而制定的。然而,还没有评估方法被测试过,以确定其为可能因气候变化而灭绝的物种提供保护行动提前预警时间的能力。为了测试红色名录系统在这方面的性能,我们使用了链接的生态位-人口模型,这些模型的栖息地动态由“按部就班”的气候变化情景驱动。我们为美国特有的范围受限的爬行动物和两栖动物生成了 100 年的重复轨迹。对于每个重复,我们根据 IUCN 红色名录标准将模拟物种分为年度、5 年和 10 年的类别(后者代表当前的做法)。对于灭绝的重复,我们将警告时间计算为模拟物种在灭绝前连续被列为受威胁类别的年数。为了模拟数据限制,我们每次只使用一个标准重复分析(忽略其他列出的标准)。结果表明,当所有标准都可以使用时,红色名录系统将提供几十年的预警时间(中位数=62 年;99%的重复中有>20 年),但表明保护行动应该在物种被列为易危物种时就开始,因为 50%的重复在被列为极危物种后的 20 年内就灭绝了。当只使用一个标准时,预警时间会大大缩短,但更频繁的评估将预警时间延长了约十年。总的来说,我们发现红色名录标准可靠地提供了一种敏感和预防性的方法来评估气候变化下的灭绝风险。