Prasad Gautam, Joshi Shantanu H, Nir Talia M, Toga Arthur W, Thompson Paul M
Imaging Genetics Center, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Jan;36 Suppl 1(0 1):S121-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.04.037. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
We compare a variety of different anatomic connectivity measures, including several novel ones, that may help in distinguishing Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients from controls. We studied diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging from 200 subjects scanned as part of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. We first evaluated measures derived from connectivity matrices based on whole-brain tractography; next, we studied additional network measures based on a novel flow-based measure of brain connectivity, computed on a dense 3-dimensional lattice. Based on these 2 kinds of connectivity matrices, we computed a variety of network measures. We evaluated the measures' ability to discriminate disease with a repeated, stratified 10-fold cross-validated classifier, using support vector machines, a supervised learning algorithm. We tested the relative importance of different combinations of features based on the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and feature ranking of the classification of 200 people into normal healthy controls and people with early or late mild cognitive impairment or AD.
我们比较了多种不同的解剖学连接性测量方法,包括几种新方法,这些方法可能有助于区分阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者和对照者。我们研究了来自200名受试者的扩散加权磁共振成像,这些受试者作为阿尔茨海默病神经成像计划的一部分接受了扫描。我们首先评估了基于全脑纤维束成像的连接矩阵得出的测量方法;接下来,我们研究了基于一种新的基于流的脑连接性测量方法的额外网络测量方法,该方法是在密集的三维晶格上计算得出的。基于这两种连接矩阵,我们计算了多种网络测量方法。我们使用支持向量机(一种监督学习算法),通过重复的分层10折交叉验证分类器评估了这些测量方法区分疾病的能力。我们根据将200人分为正常健康对照者以及患有早期或晚期轻度认知障碍或AD患者的分类的准确性、敏感性、特异性和特征排名,测试了不同特征组合的相对重要性。