Khan Ali R, Wang Lei, Beg Mirza Faisal
Department of Medical Biophysics, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Radiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Jan;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.04.036. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and tensor-based morphometry (TBM) both rely on spatial normalization to a template and yet have different requirements for the level of registration accuracy. VBM requires only global alignment of brain structures, with limited degrees of freedom in transformation, whereas TBM performs best when the registration is highly deformable and can achieve higher registration accuracy. In addition, the registration accuracy varies over the whole brain, with higher accuracy typically observed in subcortical areas and lower accuracy seen in cortical areas. Hence, even the determinant of Jacobian of registration maps is spatially varying in their accuracy, and combining these with VBM by direct multiplication introduces errors in VBM maps where the registration is inaccurate. We propose a unified approach to combining these 2 morphometry methods that is motivated by these differing requirements for registration and our interest in harnessing the advantages of both. Our novel method uses local estimates of registration confidence to determine how to weight the influence of VBM- and TBM-like approaches. Results are shown on healthy and mild Alzheimer's subjects (N = 150) investigating age and group differences, and potential of differential diagnosis is shown on a set of Alzheimer's disease (N = 34) and frontotemporal dementia (N = 30) patients compared against controls (N = 14). These show that the group differences detected by our proposed approach are more descriptive than those detected from VBM, Jacobian-modulated VBM, and TBM separately, hence leveraging the advantages of both approaches in a unified framework.
基于体素的形态学测量(VBM)和基于张量的形态学测量(TBM)都依赖于向模板的空间归一化,但对配准精度水平有不同要求。VBM仅需要脑结构的全局对齐,变换自由度有限,而当配准具有高度可变形性且能实现更高配准精度时,TBM表现最佳。此外,配准精度在整个大脑中各不相同,通常在皮质下区域观察到较高的精度,而在皮质区域精度较低。因此,即使配准图的雅可比行列式在空间上的精度也各不相同,通过直接相乘将这些与VBM相结合会在配准不准确的VBM图中引入误差。我们提出了一种统一的方法来结合这两种形态学测量方法,该方法是由这些对配准的不同要求以及我们利用两者优势的兴趣所驱动的。我们的新方法使用配准置信度的局部估计来确定如何权衡类似VBM和TBM方法的影响。结果展示了在健康和轻度阿尔茨海默病受试者(N = 150)中研究年龄和组间差异,以及在一组阿尔茨海默病患者(N = 34)和额颞叶痴呆患者(N = 30)与对照组(N = 14)比较中鉴别诊断的潜力。这些结果表明,我们提出的方法检测到的组间差异比分别从VBM、雅可比行列式调制的VBM和TBM检测到的更具描述性,从而在一个统一的框架中利用了两种方法的优势。