Lantz Stephen R, Mack Cina M, Wallace Kathleen, Key Ellen F, Shafer Timothy J, Casida John E
Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
Integrated Systems Toxicology Division, MD-B105-03, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States.
Neurotoxicology. 2014 Dec;45:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
Glufosinate (GLF) at high levels in mammals causes convulsions and amnesia through a mechanism that is not completely understood. The structural similarity of GLF to glutamate (GLU) implicates the glutamatergic system as a target for GLF neurotoxicity. The current work examined in vitro GLF interaction with N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype GLU receptors (NMDARs) and GLT-1 transporters via [(3)H]CGP 39653 binding experiments and [(3)H]GLU uptake assays, respectively. GLF effects on neuronal network activity were assessed using microelectrode array (MEA) recordings in primary cultures of cortical neurons. GLF and its primary metabolite N-acetylglufosinate (NAcGLF) bind to the NMDAR; the IC50 value for GLF was 668 μM and for NAcGLF was about 100 μM. Concentrations of GLF greater than 1000 μM were needed to decrease GLU uptake through GLT-1. In MEA recordings from networks of rat primary cortical neurons, the concentration-responses for NMDA, GLF and NAcGLF on network mean firing rates (MFR) were biphasic, increasing at lower concentrations and decreasing below control levels at higher concentrations. Increases in MFR occurred between 3-10 μM NMDA (290% control, maximum), 100-300 μM NAcGLF (190% control, maximum) and 10-1000 μM GLF (340% control, maximum). The NMDAR antagonist MK801 attenuated both NMDA and GLF increases in MFR. The GLF concentration required to alter GLU transport through GLT-1 is not likely to be attained in vivo, and therefore not relevant to the neurotoxic mode of action. However, toxicokinetic data from reports of intentional human poisonings indicate that GLF concentrations in the CNS after acute exposure could reach levels high enough to lead to effects mediated via NMDARs. Furthermore, the newly characterized action of NAcGLF at the NMDAR suggests that both the parent compound and metabolite could contribute to neurotoxicity via this pathway.
高剂量的草铵膦(GLF)在哺乳动物体内会引发惊厥和失忆,其作用机制尚未完全明确。草铵膦与谷氨酸(GLU)在结构上的相似性表明,谷氨酸能系统是草铵膦神经毒性的作用靶点。本研究分别通过[³H]CGP 39653结合实验和[³H]GLU摄取试验,体外检测了草铵膦与N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸亚型谷氨酸受体(NMDARs)和GLT-1转运体的相互作用。利用微电极阵列(MEA)记录皮层神经元原代培养物中的神经网络活动,评估草铵膦对其的影响。草铵膦及其主要代谢产物N-乙酰草铵膦(NAcGLF)均可与NMDAR结合;草铵膦的半数抑制浓度(IC50)值为668μM,N-乙酰草铵膦约为100μM。需要大于1000μM的草铵膦浓度才能通过GLT-1降低谷氨酸摄取。在大鼠原代皮层神经元网络的MEA记录中,NMDA、草铵膦和N-乙酰草铵膦对网络平均放电率(MFR)的浓度-反应呈双相性,较低浓度时增加,较高浓度时降至对照水平以下。MFR增加出现在3 - 10μM NMDA(为对照的290%,最大值)、100 - 300μM N-乙酰草铵膦(为对照的190%,最大值)和10 - 1000μM草铵膦(为对照的340%,最大值)时。NMDAR拮抗剂MK801可减弱NMDA和草铵膦引起的MFR增加。改变通过GLT-1的谷氨酸转运所需的草铵膦浓度在体内不太可能达到,因此与神经毒性作用方式无关。然而,来自人类故意中毒报告的毒代动力学数据表明,急性暴露后中枢神经系统中的草铵膦浓度可能达到足以导致通过NMDAR介导的效应的水平。此外,新发现的N-乙酰草铵膦在NMDAR上的作用表明,母体化合物及其代谢产物都可能通过该途径导致神经毒性。