Harris Joshua D, Staheli Greg, LeClere Lance, Andersone Diana, McCormick Frank
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1600-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3968-0.
More than 15 years ago, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified medical error as a problem worthy of greater attention; in the wake of the IOM report, numerous changes were made to regulations to limit residents' duty hours. However, the effect of resident work-hour changes remains controversial within the field of orthopaedics.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed a systematic review to determine whether work-hour restrictions have measurably influenced quality-of-life measures, operative and technical skill development, resident surgical education, patient care outcomes (including mortality, morbidity, adverse events, sentinel events, complications), and surgeon and resident attitudes (such as perceived effect on learning and training experiences, personal benefit, direct clinical experience, clinical preparedness).
We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and Google Scholar using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were any English language peer-reviewed articles that analyzed the effect(s) of orthopaedic surgery resident work-hour restrictions on patient safety, resident education, resident/surgeon quality of life, resident technical operative skill development, and resident surgeon attitudes toward work-hour restrictions. Eleven studies met study inclusion criteria. One study was a prospective analysis, whereas 10 studies were of level IV evidence (review of surgical case logs) or survey results.
Within our identified studies, there was some support for improved resident quality of life, improved resident sleep and less fatigue, a perceived negative impact on surgical operative and technical skill, and conflicting evidence on the topic of resident education, patient outcomes, and variable attitudes toward the work-hour changes.
There is a paucity of high-level or clear evidence evaluating the effect of the changes to resident work hours. Future research in this area should focus on objective measures that include patient safety as a primary outcome.
15 年多前,医学研究所(IOM)将医疗差错确定为一个值得更多关注的问题;在 IOM 报告发布后,对法规进行了多项修改,以限制住院医师的工作时长。然而,住院医师工作时长变化的影响在骨科领域仍存在争议。
问题/目的:我们进行了一项系统评价,以确定工作时长限制是否对生活质量指标、手术和技术技能发展、住院医师外科教育、患者护理结果(包括死亡率、发病率、不良事件、哨兵事件、并发症)以及外科医生和住院医师的态度(如对学习和培训经历的感知影响、个人收益、直接临床经验、临床准备情况)产生了可衡量的影响。
我们按照 PRISMA(系统评价和 Meta 分析的首选报告项目)指南,对 PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL(护理及相关健康文献累积索引)和谷歌学术进行了系统评价。纳入标准为任何经同行评审的英文文章,这些文章分析了骨科住院医师工作时长限制对患者安全、住院医师教育、住院医师/外科医生生活质量、住院医师技术操作技能发展以及住院医师外科医生对工作时长限制的态度的影响。11 项研究符合研究纳入标准。1 项研究为前瞻性分析,而 10 项研究为 IV 级证据(手术病例记录回顾)或调查结果。
在我们确定的研究中,有一些证据支持住院医师生活质量得到改善、睡眠改善且疲劳减轻,以及对手术操作和技术技能有感知到的负面影响,同时关于住院医师教育、患者结局以及对工作时长变化的态度存在相互矛盾的证据。
评估住院医师工作时长变化影响的高水平或明确证据匮乏。该领域未来的研究应侧重于将患者安全作为主要结局的客观指标。