Department of Psychology, University "Sapienza" of Rome Rome, Italy ; Laboratory of Experimental and Behavioral Neurophysiology, Santa Lucia Foundation Rome, Italy.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Sep 19;8:175. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00175. eCollection 2014.
Individuals regulate their emotions in a wide variety of ways. In the present review it has been addressed the issue of whether some forms of emotion regulation are healthier than others by focusing on two commonly used emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal (changing the way one thinks about potentially emotion-eliciting events) and expressive suppression (changing the way one behaviorally responds to emotion-eliciting events). In the first section, experimental findings showing that cognitive reappraisal has a healthier profile of short-term affective, cognitive, and social consequences than expressive suppression are briefly reported. In the second section, individual-difference findings are reviewed showing that using cognitive reappraisal to regulate emotions is associated with healthier patterns of affect, social functioning, and well-being than is using expressive suppression. Finally, brain structural basis and functional activation linked to the habitual usage of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression are discussed in detail.
个体通过各种方式来调节情绪。在目前的综述中,通过关注两种常用的情绪调节策略:认知重评(改变人们对潜在引发情绪事件的看法)和表达抑制(改变人们对引发情绪事件的行为反应),探讨了某些形式的情绪调节是否比其他形式更健康的问题。在第一节中,简要报告了实验结果,表明认知重评在短期情感、认知和社会后果方面比表达抑制具有更健康的特征。在第二节中,回顾了个体差异的研究结果,表明使用认知重评来调节情绪与更健康的情感模式、社交功能和幸福感相关,而使用表达抑制则与之相反。最后,详细讨论了与习惯性使用认知重评和表达抑制相关的大脑结构基础和功能激活。