Bragin Denis E, Statom Gloria L, Yonas Howard, Dai Xingping, Nemoto Edwin M
1Department of Neurosurgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM. 2Biomedical Research and Integrative Neuroimaging Center, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM. 3Department of Internal Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2582-90. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000655.
The lower limit of cerebral blood flow autoregulation is the critical cerebral perfusion pressure at which cerebral blood flow begins to fall. It is important that cerebral perfusion pressure be maintained above this level to ensure adequate cerebral blood flow, especially in patients with high intracranial pressure. However, the critical cerebral perfusion pressure of 50 mm Hg, obtained by decreasing mean arterial pressure, differs from the value of 30 mm Hg, obtained by increasing intracranial pressure, which we previously showed was due to microvascular shunt flow maintenance of a falsely high cerebral blood flow. The present study shows that the critical cerebral perfusion pressure, measured by increasing intracranial pressure to decrease cerebral perfusion pressure, is inaccurate but accurately determined by dopamine-induced dynamic intracranial pressure reactivity and cerebrovascular reactivity.
Cerebral perfusion pressure was decreased either by increasing intracranial pressure or decreasing mean arterial pressure and the critical cerebral perfusion pressure by both methods compared. Cortical Doppler flux, intracranial pressure, and mean arterial pressure were monitored throughout the study. At each cerebral perfusion pressure, we measured microvascular RBC flow velocity, blood-brain barrier integrity (transcapillary dye extravasation), and tissue oxygenation (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) in the cerebral cortex of rats using in vivo two-photon laser scanning microscopy.
University laboratory.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats.
At each cerebral perfusion pressure, dopamine-induced arterial pressure transients (~10 mm Hg, ~45 s duration) were used to measure induced intracranial pressure reactivity (Δ intracranial pressure/Δ mean arterial pressure) and induced cerebrovascular reactivity (Δ cerebral blood flow/Δ mean arterial pressure).
At a normal cerebral perfusion pressure of 70 mm Hg, 10 mm Hg mean arterial pressure pulses had no effect on intracranial pressure or cerebral blood flow (induced intracranial pressure reactivity = -0.03 ± 0.07 and induced cerebrovascular reactivity = -0.02 ± 0.09), reflecting intact autoregulation. Decreasing cerebral perfusion pressure to 50 mm Hg by increasing intracranial pressure increased induced intracranial pressure reactivity and induced cerebrovascular reactivity to 0.24 ± 0.09 and 0.31 ± 0.13, respectively, reflecting impaired autoregulation (p < 0.05). By static cerebral blood flow, the first significant decrease in cerebral blood flow occurred at a cerebral perfusion pressure of 30 mm Hg (0.71 ± 0.08, p < 0.05).
Critical cerebral perfusion pressure of 50 mm Hg was accurately determined by induced intracranial pressure reactivity and induced cerebrovascular reactivity, whereas the static method failed.
脑血流自动调节下限是指脑血流开始下降时的临界脑灌注压。维持脑灌注压高于此水平以确保充足的脑血流非常重要,尤其是在颅内压升高的患者中。然而,通过降低平均动脉压获得的50mmHg临界脑灌注压与通过升高颅内压获得的30mmHg值不同,我们之前表明这是由于微血管分流维持了错误的高脑血流。本研究表明,通过升高颅内压以降低脑灌注压来测量的临界脑灌注压不准确,但通过多巴胺诱导的动态颅内压反应性和脑血管反应性可准确测定。
通过升高颅内压或降低平均动脉压来降低脑灌注压,并比较两种方法测得的临界脑灌注压。在整个研究过程中监测皮质多普勒血流、颅内压和平均动脉压。在每个脑灌注压水平,我们使用体内双光子激光扫描显微镜测量大鼠大脑皮质中的微血管红细胞流速、血脑屏障完整性(跨毛细血管染料外渗)和组织氧合(还原型烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸)。
大学实验室。
雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠。
在每个脑灌注压水平,使用多巴胺诱导的动脉压瞬变(约10mmHg,持续约45秒)来测量诱导的颅内压反应性(Δ颅内压/Δ平均动脉压)和诱导的脑血管反应性(Δ脑血流/Δ平均动脉压)。
在正常脑灌注压70mmHg时,10mmHg的平均动脉压脉冲对颅内压或脑血流无影响(诱导的颅内压反应性=-0.03±0.07,诱导的脑血管反应性=-0.02±0.09),反映自动调节功能完好。通过升高颅内压将脑灌注压降至50mmHg时,诱导的颅内压反应性和诱导的脑血管反应性分别增加至0.24±0.09和0.31±0.13,反映自动调节功能受损(p<0.05)。根据静态脑血流,脑血流首次显著下降发生在脑灌注压为30mmHg时(0.71±0.08,p<0.05)。
通过诱导的颅内压反应性和诱导的脑血管反应性可准确测定50mmHg的临界脑灌注压,而静态方法则失败。