Villanueva Matthew G, Lane Christianne Joy, Schroeder E Todd
Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, Clinical Exercise Research Center, University of Southern California, 1540 E. Alcazar St., CHP-149, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Feb;115(2):295-308. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-3014-7. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
To determine if 8 weeks of periodized strength resistance training (RT) utilizing relatively short rest interval lengths (RI) in between sets (SS) would induce greater improvements in body composition and muscular performance, compared to the same RT program utilizing extended RI (SL).
22 male volunteers (SS: n = 11, 65.6 ± 3.4 years; SL: n = 11, 70.3 ± 4.9 years) were assigned to one of two strength RT groups, following 4 weeks of periodized hypertrophic RT (PHRT): strength RT with 60-s RI (SS) or strength RT with 4-min RI (SL). Prior to randomization, all 22 study participants trained 3 days/week, for 4 weeks, targeting hypertrophy; from week 4 to week 12, SS and SL followed the same periodized strength RT program for 8 weeks, with RI the only difference in their RT prescription.
Following PHRT, all study participants experienced increases in lean body mass (LBM) (p < 0.01), upper and lower body strength (p < 0.001), and dynamic power (p < 0.001), as well as decreases in percentage body fat (p < 0.05). Across the 8-week strength RT phase, SS experienced significantly greater increases in LBM (p = 0.001), flat machine bench press 1-RM (p < 0.001), bilateral leg press 1-RM (p < 0.001), narrow/neutral grip lat pulldown (p < 0.01), and Margaria stair-climbing power (p < 0.001), compared to SL.
This study suggests 8 weeks of periodized high-intensity strength RT with shortened RI induces significantly greater enhancements in body composition, muscular performance, and functional performance, compared to the same RT prescription with extended RI, in older men. Applied professionals may optimize certain RT-induced adaptations, by incorporating shortened RI.
确定与采用延长休息间隔(SL)的相同抗阻训练(RT)计划相比,在组间使用相对较短休息间隔长度(RI)进行8周的周期性力量抗阻训练(RT)是否能在身体成分和肌肉性能方面带来更大改善。
22名男性志愿者(SS组:n = 11,65.6 ± 3.4岁;SL组:n = 11,70.3 ± 4.9岁)在进行4周的周期性肥大抗阻训练(PHRT)后,被分配到两个力量RT组之一:采用60秒RI的力量RT(SS组)或采用4分钟RI的力量RT(SL组)。在随机分组之前,所有22名研究参与者每周训练3天,共4周,目标是肥大;从第4周到第12周,SS组和SL组遵循相同的周期性力量RT计划8周,RI是他们RT处方中唯一的差异。
在PHRT之后,所有研究参与者的瘦体重(LBM)增加(p < 0.01),上肢和下肢力量增加(p < 0.001),动态功率增加(p < 0.001),以及体脂百分比降低(p < 0.05)。在8周的力量RT阶段,与SL组相比,SS组在LBM(p = 0.001)、平板卧推1-RM(p < 0.001)、双侧腿举1-RM(p < 0.001)、窄握/中立握下拉(p < 0.01)和玛加里亚楼梯攀爬功率(p < 0.001)方面有显著更大的增加。
本研究表明,与采用延长RI的相同RT处方相比,在老年男性中,8周的周期性高强度力量RT结合缩短的RI在身体成分、肌肉性能和功能性能方面能带来显著更大的增强。应用专业人员可以通过采用缩短的RI来优化某些RT诱导的适应性变化。