Amoretti Carolina Friedrich, Rodrigues Gleiber Oliveira, Carvalho Paulo Roberto Antonacci, Trotta Eliana de Andrade
Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Departamento de Pediatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008 Dec;20(4):325-30.
Sedation scores are important tools for use in pediatric intensive care units. The Comfort-Behavior scale is a valid method for the assessment of children although it is considered an extensive scale. The motor activity assessment scale is validated for an adult population. We considered it simpler then the one above and suitable for application in children. None of these scores had been translated into Portuguese. Our objective was to apply both scales in Portuguese to a pediatric population under mechanical ventilation. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the sedation level of children on mechanical ventilation in tertiary pediatric intensive care units and to compare the Comfort- Behavior and motor activity assessment scales in this population.
After translating the scales into Portuguese, both were simultaneously applied to 26 patients by 2 pediatricians. Each scale was applied 116 times in total.
The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.90 (0.85 - 0.93 CI 95%) for the Comfort-Behavior and 0.94 (0.92 - 0.96 CI 95%) for the motor activity assessment scale. When applying the Comfort-Behavior scale, the Crombach's alpha was 0.81 for observer A and 0.92 for observer B. The Spearman coefficient was 0.86 for observer A and 0.91 for observer B. These patients were found to be deeply sedated, showing low values in both scales.
The scales were successfully translated into Portuguese and both were adequate to assess pain and sedation in the pediatric population under mechanical ventilation. Sedation level was high in this sample of applications.
镇静评分是儿科重症监护病房中使用的重要工具。舒适度-行为量表是评估儿童的有效方法,尽管它被认为是一个较为繁杂的量表。运动活动评估量表已在成年人群中得到验证。我们认为它比上述量表更简单,适用于儿童。这些评分均未被翻译成葡萄牙语。我们的目的是将这两个量表翻译成葡萄牙语并应用于接受机械通气的儿科患者。次要目的是评估三级儿科重症监护病房中接受机械通气儿童的镇静水平,并比较该人群中舒适度-行为量表和运动活动评估量表。
将量表翻译成葡萄牙语后,两名儿科医生同时将其应用于26例患者。每个量表总共应用了116次。
舒适度-行为量表的组内相关系数为0.90(95%置信区间0.85 - 0.93),运动活动评估量表的组内相关系数为0.94(95%置信区间0.92 - 0.96)。应用舒适度-行为量表时,观察者A的克伦巴赫α系数为0.81,观察者B的为0.92。观察者A的斯皮尔曼系数为0.86,观察者B的为0.91。发现这些患者处于深度镇静状态,两个量表的得分均较低。
量表已成功翻译成葡萄牙语,两者均适用于评估接受机械通气的儿科患者的疼痛和镇静情况。在该应用样本中,镇静水平较高。