• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对社会困境的不同认知:结构化群体中的进化多博弈

Different perceptions of social dilemmas: evolutionary multigames in structured populations.

作者信息

Wang Zhen, Szolnoki Attila, Perc Matjaž

机构信息

School of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116621, China.

Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Science, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Post Office Box 49, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Sep;90(3):032813. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032813. Epub 2014 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032813
PMID:25314488
Abstract

Motivated by the fact that the same social dilemma can be perceived differently by different players, we here study evolutionary multigames in structured populations. While the core game is the weak prisoner's dilemma, a fraction of the population adopts either a positive or a negative value of the sucker's payoff, thus playing either the traditional prisoner's dilemma or the snowdrift game. We show that the higher the fraction of the population adopting a different payoff matrix the more the evolution of cooperation is promoted. The microscopic mechanism responsible for this outcome is unique to structured populations, and it is due to the payoff heterogeneity, which spontaneously introduces strong cooperative leaders that give rise to an asymmetric strategy imitation flow in favor of cooperation. We demonstrate that the reported evolutionary outcomes are robust against variations of the interaction network, and they also remain valid if players are allowed to vary which game they play over time. These results corroborate existing evidence in favor of heterogeneity-enhanced network reciprocity, and they reveal how different perceptions of social dilemmas may contribute to their resolution.

摘要

鉴于不同参与者对同一社会困境可能有不同的认知,我们在此研究结构化群体中的进化多博弈。核心博弈是弱囚徒困境,群体中有一部分人采用正或负的受骗者收益值,从而分别进行传统囚徒困境博弈或雪堆博弈。我们表明,采用不同收益矩阵的群体比例越高,合作的进化就越能得到促进。导致这一结果的微观机制是结构化群体所特有的,这是由于收益异质性,它自发地引入了强大的合作领导者,从而产生了有利于合作的不对称策略模仿流。我们证明,所报告的进化结果对于互动网络的变化具有鲁棒性,并且如果允许参与者随时间改变他们所进行的博弈,这些结果仍然有效。这些结果证实了支持异质性增强网络互惠性的现有证据,并且揭示了对社会困境的不同认知可能如何有助于解决这些困境。

相似文献

1
Different perceptions of social dilemmas: evolutionary multigames in structured populations.对社会困境的不同认知:结构化群体中的进化多博弈
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Sep;90(3):032813. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032813. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
2
Coveting thy neighbors fitness as a means to resolve social dilemmas.觊觎邻居的健康作为解决社会困境的一种手段。
J Theor Biol. 2011 May 21;277(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.02.016. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
3
Evolutionary escape from the prisoner's dilemma.从囚徒困境中实现进化逃逸。
J Theor Biol. 2007 Apr 7;245(3):411-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
4
Thermodynamic susceptibility as a measure of cooperative behavior in social dilemmas.热力学敏感性作为衡量社会困境中合作行为的指标。
Chaos. 2020 Sep;30(9):093117. doi: 10.1063/5.0015655.
5
Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas.三种社会困境中的间接互惠
J Theor Biol. 2014 Aug 21;355:117-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.03.035. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
6
Transforming the dilemma.转变困境。
Evolution. 2007 Oct;61(10):2281-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00196.x. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
7
From degree-correlated to payoff-correlated activity for an optimal resolution of social dilemmas.从度相关到收益相关的活动,以实现社会困境的最佳解决。
Phys Rev E. 2016 Dec;94(6-1):062315. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.062315. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
8
A theoretical analysis of temporal difference learning in the iterated prisoner's dilemma game.在迭代囚徒困境博弈中对时间差分学习的理论分析。
Bull Math Biol. 2009 Nov;71(8):1818-50. doi: 10.1007/s11538-009-9424-8. Epub 2009 May 29.
9
Human cooperation in social dilemmas: comparing the Snowdrift game with the Prisoner's Dilemma.社会困境中的人类合作:将雪堆博弈与囚徒困境进行比较。
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 7;274(1628):2965-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0793.
10
What controls network reciprocity in the Prisoner's Dilemma game?在囚徒困境博弈中,是什么控制着网络互惠性?
Biosystems. 2010 Nov-Dec;102(2-3):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.07.017. Epub 2010 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A Method for Trust-Based Collaborative Smart Device Selection and Resource Allocation in the Financial Internet of Things.金融物联网中基于信任的协作智能设备选择与资源分配方法
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 30;25(13):4082. doi: 10.3390/s25134082.
2
Interaction between games give rise to the evolution of moral norms of cooperation.游戏之间的相互作用产生了合作道德规范的演变。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Sep 29;18(9):e1010429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010429. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Eco-evolutionary dynamics of multigames with mutations.
具有突变的多游戏的生态进化动力学。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 9;17(8):e0272719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272719. eCollection 2022.
4
Cooperation and competition between pair and multi-player social games in spatial populations.空间群体中双人及多人社交游戏的合作与竞争。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 8;11(1):12101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91532-5.
5
Heterogeneity in evolutionary games: an analysis of the risk perception.进化博弈中的异质性:风险感知分析
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 May;476(2237):20200116. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0116. Epub 2020 May 13.
6
Seasonal payoff variations and the evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas.季节性收益变化与社会困境中合作的演化。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 29;9(1):12575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49075-3.
7
An experimental study of network effects on coordination in asymmetric games.网络效应对非对称博弈协调的实验研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 2;9(1):6842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43260-0.
8
Coevolution of Environmental Perception and Cooperative Behavior in Evacuation Crowd.疏散人群中环境感知与合作行为的共同进化。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 5;8(1):16311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33798-w.
9
Cyclic dominance emerges from the evolution of two inter-linked cooperative behaviours in the social amoeba.循环优势源于社会变形虫中两种相互关联的合作行为的进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 27;285(1881). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0905.
10
Network effects on coordination in asymmetric games.网络效应对非对称博弈中的协调的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 5;7(1):17016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16982-2.