• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网络效应对非对称博弈中的协调的影响。

Network effects on coordination in asymmetric games.

机构信息

Utrecht University, Department of Sociology/ICS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Utrecht University, Institute for Theoretical Physics, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 5;7(1):17016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16982-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-16982-2
PMID:29208965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5717250/
Abstract

Network structure can have an important effect on the behavior of players in an iterated 2 × 2 game. We study the effect of network structure on global and local behavior in asymmetric coordination games using best response dynamics. We find that global behavior is highly dependent on network topology. Random (Erdös-Rényi) networks mostly converge to homogeneous behavior, but the higher the clustering in the network the more heterogeneous the behavior becomes. Behavior within the communities of the network is almost exclusively homogeneous. The findings suggest that clustering of networks facilitates self-organization of uniform behavior within clusters, but heterogeneous behavior between clusters. At the local level we find that some nodes are more important in determining the equilibrium behavior than other nodes. Degree centrality is for most networks the main predictor for the behavior and nodes with an even degree have an advantage over nodes with an uneven degree in dictating the behavior. We conclude that the behavior is difficult to predict for (Erdös-Rényi) networks and that the network imposes the behavior as a function of clustering and degree heterogeneity in other networks.

摘要

网络结构对重复 2×2 博弈中参与者的行为有重要影响。我们使用最佳响应动力学研究了网络结构对非对称协调博弈中全局和局部行为的影响。我们发现,全局行为高度依赖于网络拓扑。随机(Erdős-Rényi)网络主要趋向于同质行为,但网络聚类度越高,行为的异质性就越强。网络社区内的行为几乎完全是同质的。研究结果表明,网络聚类有助于在聚类内部自组织一致的行为,但在聚类之间则产生异质的行为。在局部水平上,我们发现有些节点比其他节点在确定均衡行为方面更为重要。在大多数网络中,度中心性是预测行为的主要指标,具有偶数度的节点比具有奇数度的节点在决定行为方面具有优势。我们的结论是,(Erdős-Rényi)网络的行为难以预测,而网络则将行为作为聚类和度异质性的函数强加给其他网络。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/5717250/0446ad78e4fe/41598_2017_16982_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/5717250/7fe4ea8eadd9/41598_2017_16982_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/5717250/40cd71ae9178/41598_2017_16982_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/5717250/0446ad78e4fe/41598_2017_16982_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/5717250/7fe4ea8eadd9/41598_2017_16982_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/5717250/40cd71ae9178/41598_2017_16982_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe9/5717250/0446ad78e4fe/41598_2017_16982_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Network effects on coordination in asymmetric games.网络效应对非对称博弈中的协调的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 5;7(1):17016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16982-2.
2
An experimental study of network effects on coordination in asymmetric games.网络效应对非对称博弈协调的实验研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 2;9(1):6842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43260-0.
3
Coordination on networks: does topology matter?网络协调:拓扑结构重要吗?
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055033. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
4
Robustness of network of networks under targeted attack.遭受定向攻击时网络之网络的稳健性。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 May;87(5):052804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.052804. Epub 2013 May 16.
5
Metric clusters in evolutionary games on scale-free networks.无标度网络上进化博弈中的测度团簇。
Nat Commun. 2017 Dec 1;8(1):1888. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02078-y.
6
Stability of strategies in payoff-driven evolutionary games on networks.网络收益驱动进化博弈中的策略稳定性。
Chaos. 2011 Sep;21(3):033110. doi: 10.1063/1.3613924.
7
Optimal interdependence between networks for the evolution of cooperation.网络之间的最优相互依存关系促进合作的演化。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2470. doi: 10.1038/srep02470.
8
Dynamical analysis of evolutionary public goods game on signed networks.有符号网络上进化公共物品博弈的动态分析。
Chaos. 2022 Feb;32(2):023107. doi: 10.1063/5.0070358.
9
Axelrod's metanorm games on networks.阿克塞尔罗德的网络超模对策游戏。
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020474. Epub 2011 May 31.
10
Robustness of a network formed by n interdependent networks with a one-to-one correspondence of dependent nodes.由n个相互依存网络形成的网络的稳健性,其中依存节点一一对应。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Jun;85(6 Pt 2):066134. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.066134. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Criminal organizations exhibit hysteresis, resilience, and robustness by balancing security and efficiency.犯罪组织通过平衡安全性和效率展现出滞后性、恢复力和稳健性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 30;14(1):17678. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68445-0.
2
Voter-like Dynamics with Conflicting Preferences on Modular Networks.模块化网络上具有冲突偏好的类似选民的动态
Entropy (Basel). 2023 May 24;25(6):838. doi: 10.3390/e25060838.
3
Network coevolution drives segregation and enhances Pareto optimal equilibrium selection in coordination games.网络共同进化推动协调博弈中的隔离并增强帕累托最优均衡选择。

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Network Characteristics on Reaching the Payoff-Dominant Equilibrium in Coordination Games: A Simulation study.网络特征对协调博弈中实现收益主导均衡的影响:一项模拟研究。
Dyn Games Appl. 2016;6(4):477-494. doi: 10.1007/s13235-015-0144-4. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
2
Epidemic spreading on complex networks with community structures.具有社区结构的复杂网络上的疫情传播。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 21;6:29748. doi: 10.1038/srep29748.
3
Evolutionary mixed games in structured populations: Cooperation and the benefits of heterogeneity.结构种群中的进化混合博弈:合作与异质性的收益。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 17;13(1):2866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30011-5.
4
The dual problems of coordination and anti-coordination on random bipartite graphs.随机二分图上的协调与反协调双重问题。
New J Phys. 2021 Nov;23(11). doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac3319. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
5
An experimental study of network effects on coordination in asymmetric games.网络效应对非对称博弈协调的实验研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 2;9(1):6842. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43260-0.
6
Nash Equilibria in the Response Strategy of Correlated Games.关联博弈中的响应策略中的纳什均衡。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 20;9(1):2352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36562-2.
Phys Rev E. 2016 Apr;93:042304. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.042304. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
4
Evolution of extortion in structured populations.结构化种群中勒索行为的演变。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Feb;89(2):022804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.022804. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
5
Different perceptions of social dilemmas: evolutionary multigames in structured populations.对社会困境的不同认知:结构化群体中的进化多博弈
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Sep;90(3):032813. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032813. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
6
Defection and extortion as unexpected catalysts of unconditional cooperation in structured populations.背叛与敲诈作为结构化群体中无条件合作的意外催化剂。
Sci Rep. 2014 Jun 30;4:5496. doi: 10.1038/srep05496.
7
Topological traps control flow on real networks: the case of coordination failures.拓扑陷阱控制真实网络中的流:协调失败案例。
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 9;5(12):e15210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015210.
8
Effect of spatial structure on the evolution of cooperation.空间结构对合作进化的影响。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Oct;80(4 Pt 2):046106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046106. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
9
Modularity and community structure in networks.网络中的模块化与群落结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8577-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601602103. Epub 2006 May 24.
10
Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations.结构化异质群体中社会困境的进化动力学
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 28;103(9):3490-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508201103. Epub 2006 Feb 16.