• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Suicidal thoughts and reasons for living in hospitalized patients with severe depression: post-hoc analyses of a double-blind randomized trial of duloxetine.重度抑郁症住院患者的自杀念头及生存理由:度洛西汀双盲随机试验的事后分析
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2014;16(3). doi: 10.4088/PCC.13m01591. Epub 2014 May 1.
2
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg and 120 mg daily in patients hospitalized for severe depression: a double-blind randomized trial.每日服用 60 毫克和 120 毫克度洛西汀治疗因重度抑郁症住院患者的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;72(8):1086-94. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05723blu. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
3
Desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an 8-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial and a post hoc pooled analysis of three studies.度洛西汀50毫克/天和100毫克/天治疗重度抑郁症:一项为期8周的III期多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照平行组试验及三项研究的事后汇总分析。
Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31 Pt 1:1405-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.006.
4
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg once daily in the treatment of pain in patients with major depressive disorder and at least moderate pain of unknown etiology: a randomized controlled trial.度洛西汀每日一次60毫克治疗重度抑郁症伴至少中度不明原因疼痛患者疼痛的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;68(11):1707-16. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n1110.
5
A randomized controlled trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of nonmajor chronic depression.度洛西汀与安慰剂治疗非重症慢性抑郁症的随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):984-91. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07230.
6
A randomized placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and associated painful physical symptoms.一项度洛西汀治疗伴有疼痛性躯体症状的重性抑郁障碍患者的随机安慰剂对照试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1849-58. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.609539. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
7
Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder and associated painful physical symptoms: a replication study.度洛西汀与安慰剂治疗主要抑郁障碍及相关躯体疼痛症状的比较:一项复制研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1859-67. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.609540. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
8
Patient-assessed versus physician-assessed disease severity and outcome in patients with nonspecific pain associated with major depressive disorder.伴有重度抑郁症的非特异性疼痛患者中患者自我评估与医生评估的疾病严重程度及预后
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;11(1):8-15. doi: 10.4088/pcc.08m00670.
9
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.度洛西汀用于重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:一项安慰剂及帕罗西汀对照试验
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.
10
Evidence for efficacy and tolerability of vilazodone in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.维拉佐酮治疗重度抑郁症的疗效和耐受性证据:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;70(3):326-33. doi: 10.4088/jcp.08m04637. Epub 2009 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated With Reasons for Living Among Suicidal Adolescents.与自杀青少年生存原因相关的因素。
Arch Suicide Res. 2024 Apr-Jun;28(2):471-481. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2023.2190367. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
2
Meaning of life as a resource for coping with psychological crisis: Comparisons of suicidal and non-suicidal patients.生命意义作为应对心理危机的一种资源:自杀患者与非自杀患者的比较
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 30;13:957782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957782. eCollection 2022.
3
Why Do People Live or Die? A Retrospective Study from a Crisis Intervention Clinic in North India.人们为何生或死?来自印度北部一家危机干预诊所的回顾性研究。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2022 Jan;44(1):17-21. doi: 10.1177/02537176211022508. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Suicide detection in Chile: proposing a predictive model for suicide risk in a clinical sample of patients with mood disorders.智利的自杀检测:为情绪障碍患者临床样本中的自杀风险提出预测模型。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2017 Jan-Mar;39(1):1-11. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2015-1877. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk and protective factors that distinguish adolescents who attempt suicide from those who only consider suicide in the past year.在过去一年中,区分企图自杀的青少年与仅考虑过自杀的青少年的风险因素和保护因素。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Feb;44(1):6-22. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12046. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
2
Affective temperaments and hopelessness as predictors of health and social functioning in mood disorder patients: a prospective follow-up study.心境障碍患者的情感气质和绝望感对健康和社会功能的预测:一项前瞻性随访研究。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):216-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.026. Epub 2013 May 17.
3
Racial identity and reasons for living in African American female suicide attempters.非裔美国女性自杀未遂者的种族认同和生存原因。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2012 Oct;18(4):416-23. doi: 10.1037/a0029594. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
4
Suicidal risk factors in bipolar I and II disorder patients.双相 I 型和 II 型障碍患者的自杀风险因素。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;73(6):778-82. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07041. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
5
Appraisal of suicidal risk among adolescents and young adults through the Rorschach test.罗夏测验评估青少年和青年的自杀风险。
J Pers Assess. 2011 Sep-Oct;93(5):518-26. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.594130.
6
Higher hopelessness and suicide risk predict lower self-deception among psychiatric patients and non-clinical individuals.更高的绝望感和自杀风险预示着精神科患者和非临床个体的自我欺骗程度更低。
Riv Psichiatr. 2011 Jan-Feb;46(1):24-30.
7
Moral or religious objections to suicide may protect against suicidal behavior in bipolar disorder.道德或宗教上反对自杀可能有助于预防双相情感障碍患者的自杀行为。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;72(10):1390-6. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05910gre.
8
Suicidality and depression among african american adolescents: the role of family and peer support and community connectedness.非裔美国青少年的自杀意念和抑郁:家庭、同伴支持和社区联系的作用。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011 Jan;81(1):108-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01078.x.
9
Likelihood of suicidality at varying levels of depression severity: a re-analysis of NESARC data.不同抑郁严重程度自杀可能性分析:对 NESARC 数据的重新分析。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2010 Dec;40(6):620-7. doi: 10.1521/suli.2010.40.6.620.
10
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg and 120 mg daily in patients hospitalized for severe depression: a double-blind randomized trial.每日服用 60 毫克和 120 毫克度洛西汀治疗因重度抑郁症住院患者的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;72(8):1086-94. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05723blu. Epub 2010 Sep 21.

重度抑郁症住院患者的自杀念头及生存理由:度洛西汀双盲随机试验的事后分析

Suicidal thoughts and reasons for living in hospitalized patients with severe depression: post-hoc analyses of a double-blind randomized trial of duloxetine.

作者信息

Demyttenaere Koen, Desaiah Durisala, Raskin Joel, Cairns Victoria, Brecht Stephan

机构信息

University Psychiatric Center KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (Dr Demyttenaere); Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (Dr Desaiah); Eli Lilly and Company, Toronto, Canada (Dr Raskin); Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH (consultant statistician), Oxford, United Kingdom (Dr Cairns); and Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany (Dr Brecht).

出版信息

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2014;16(3). doi: 10.4088/PCC.13m01591. Epub 2014 May 1.

DOI:10.4088/PCC.13m01591
PMID:25317365
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4195637/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate suicidal thoughts in relationship to depressive symptom severity and reasons for living in patients hospitalized for major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHOD

A post hoc analysis was conducted of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial involving hospitalized patients with MDD (DSM-IV criteria) who received duloxetine 60 mg once daily or duloxetine 60 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. After 4 weeks, the dose for nonresponders receiving 60 mg once daily could be increased to 60 mg twice daily (double-blind). The study was conducted between February 9, 2007, and August 26, 2008 at 43 centers in 4 countries across Europe and South Africa. Suicidal thoughts were assessed with Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) item 10, depression severity was assessed with the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale, and protective factors were assessed with the patient-rated Reasons for Living Inventory (RFL) assessing 6 domains. Descriptive statistics, correlation, and linear regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients (N = 336) had varying severity of suicidal thoughts: 18% had a score ≥ 4. The proportion of patients with a score ≥ 4 decreased to 7% at week 1 and 1% at week 8 of treatment. The RFL scores at baseline were lower in patients with higher baseline suicidal thoughts and increased significantly during treatment (P < .0001). A regression model revealed that only 16% of variance in baseline total RFL score is explained by the different MADRS items. Eight patients had suicidal behavior or ideation recorded as an adverse event during the study; no consistent pattern was found in the different psychometric scores either at baseline or at the visit preceding the suicidal behavior/ideation.

CONCLUSIONS

Suicidality rapidly decreased in hospitalized patients with severe depression treated with duloxetine. The RFL scores were low at baseline but increased during treatment, suggesting that they are at least partially state rather than trait variables. Since RFL scores are lower in depressed inpatients, these scores lose the predictive value that they have in a general population sample.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00422162.

摘要

目的

评估重度抑郁症(MDD)住院患者自杀念头与抑郁症状严重程度及生存理由之间的关系。

方法

对一项随机、双盲、平行组试验进行事后分析,该试验纳入了符合DSM-IV标准的MDD住院患者,他们接受每日一次60毫克度洛西汀或每日两次60毫克度洛西汀治疗8周。4周后,每日一次服用60毫克无反应者的剂量可增至每日两次60毫克(双盲)。该研究于2007年2月9日至2008年8月26日在欧洲和南非4个国家的43个中心进行。采用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)第10项评估自杀念头,采用6项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表和临床总体印象-疾病严重程度量表评估抑郁严重程度,采用患者自评的生存理由量表(RFL)评估6个领域的保护因素。进行描述性统计、相关性分析和线性回归分析。

结果

基线时,患者(N = 336)自杀念头严重程度各异:18%的患者得分≥4分。治疗第1周时,得分≥4分的患者比例降至7%,治疗第8周时降至1%。基线时自杀念头较高的患者RFL得分较低,且治疗期间显著升高(P < .0001)。回归模型显示,不同的MADRS项目仅能解释基线总RFL得分16%的变异。8例患者在研究期间有自杀行为或意念被记录为不良事件;在基线或自杀行为/意念发生前的访视中,不同的心理测量分数均未发现一致模式。

结论

用度洛西汀治疗的重度抑郁住院患者自杀倾向迅速降低。RFL得分在基线时较低,但治疗期间升高,表明它们至少部分是状态变量而非特质变量。由于抑郁住院患者的RFL得分较低,这些分数失去了在一般人群样本中的预测价值。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00422162。