• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用标准化工具评估儿童在研究中的同意能力:一项有效性研究。

Assessing children's competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and de Bascule, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, Amsterdam, 1105, AZ, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2012 Sep 25;12:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-156.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-12-156
PMID:23009102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3506483/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently over 50% of drugs prescribed to children have not been evaluated properly for use in their age group. One key reason why children have been excluded from clinical trials is that they are not considered able to exercise meaningful autonomy over the decision to participate. Dutch law states that competence to consent can be presumed present at the age of 12 and above; however, in pediatric practice children's competence is not that clearly presented and the transition from assent to active consent is gradual. A gold standard for competence assessment in children does not exist. In this article we describe a study protocol on the development of a standardized tool for assessing competence to consent in research in children and adolescents.

METHODS/DESIGN: In this study we modified the MacCAT-CR, the best evaluated competence assessment tool for adults, for use in children and adolescents. We will administer the tool prospectively to a cohort of pediatric patients from 6 to18 years during the selection stages of ongoing clinical trials. The outcomes of the MacCAT-CR interviews will be compared to a reference standard, established by the judgments of clinical investigators, and an expert panel consisting of child psychiatrists, child psychologists and medical ethicists. The reliability, criterion-related validity and reproducibility of the tool will be determined. As MacCAT-CR is a multi-item scale consisting of 13 items, power was justified at 130-190 subjects, providing a minimum of 10-15 observations per item. MacCAT-CR outcomes will be correlated with age, life experience, IQ, ethnicity, socio-economic status and competence judgment of the parent(s). It is anticipated that 160 participants will be recruited over 2 years to complete enrollment.

DISCUSSION

A validity study on an assessment tool of competence to consent is strongly needed in research practice, particularly in the child and adolescent population. In this study we will establish a reference standard of children's competence to consent, combined with validation of an assessment instrument. Results can facilitate responsible involvement of children in clinical trials by further development of guidelines, health-care policies and legal policies.

摘要

背景

目前,超过 50%的给儿童开的处方药物并没有在他们这个年龄段进行适当的评估。儿童被排除在临床试验之外的一个关键原因是,他们被认为无法对参与决定行使有意义的自主权。荷兰法律规定,12 岁及以上的人可以被推定为具有同意能力;然而,在儿科实践中,儿童的能力并不是那么明确,从同意到积极同意的转变是渐进的。儿童同意能力评估的黄金标准并不存在。在本文中,我们描述了一项关于开发一种标准化工具评估儿童和青少年参与研究的同意能力的研究方案。

方法/设计:在这项研究中,我们修改了 MacCAT-CR,这是评估成人同意能力的最佳评估工具,用于儿童和青少年。我们将前瞻性地在正在进行的临床试验的选择阶段对 6 至 18 岁的儿科患者进行测试。MacCAT-CR 访谈的结果将与参考标准进行比较,参考标准由临床研究者和一个由儿童精神科医生、儿童心理学家和医学伦理学家组成的专家小组确定。工具的可靠性、效标相关性和可重复性将被确定。由于 MacCAT-CR 是一个由 13 个项目组成的多项目量表,因此在 130-190 名受试者中进行了论证,每个项目至少有 10-15 个观察值。MacCAT-CR 的结果将与年龄、生活经验、智商、种族、社会经济地位和父母的同意判断相关联。预计在 2 年内将有 160 名参与者完成入组。

讨论

在研究实践中,特别是在儿童和青少年人群中,非常需要对同意能力评估工具进行有效性研究。在这项研究中,我们将建立一个儿童同意能力的参考标准,同时验证一个评估工具。研究结果可以通过进一步制定指南、医疗保健政策和法律政策,促进儿童在临床试验中的负责任参与。

相似文献

1
Assessing children's competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study.使用标准化工具评估儿童在研究中的同意能力:一项有效性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Sep 25;12:156. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-156.
2
Accuracy of the MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research (MacCAT-CR) for measuring children's competence to consent to clinical research.麦克阿瑟临床研究能力评估工具(MacCAT-CR)评估儿童同意参与临床研究能力的准确性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Dec;168(12):1147-53. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1694.
3
Informed consent instead of assent is appropriate in children from the age of twelve: Policy implications of new findings on children's competence to consent to clinical research.对于12岁及以上儿童,适用知情同意而非同意:关于儿童同意参与临床研究能力的新发现的政策影响。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 9;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0067-z.
4
Feasibility of an Assessment Tool for Children's Competence to Consent to Predictive Genetic Testing: a Pilot Study.儿童同意进行预测性基因检测能力评估工具的可行性:一项试点研究。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Dec;24(6):971-7. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9835-7. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
5
Key factors in children's competence to consent to clinical research.儿童同意参与临床研究的能力的关键因素。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Oct 24;16(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0066-0.
6
Report of an initial pilot study on the feasibility of using the MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.关于使用麦克阿瑟能力评估工具对注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童和青少年进行临床研究的可行性的初步试点研究报告。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2010 Feb;20(1):63-7. doi: 10.1089/cap.2008.0114.
7
Spanish Validation of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research Interview for Assessing Patients' Mental Capacity to Consent to Clinical Research.用于评估患者同意临床研究的心理能力的麦克阿瑟临床研究访谈能力评估工具的西班牙语验证
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Dec;12(5):343-351. doi: 10.1177/1556264617720755. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
8
Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence?为何在评估儿童决策能力方面难以取得进展?
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jan 10;16:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-16-1.
9
Evaluation of the capacity of inpatients with chronic schizophrenia to provide informed consent for participation in clinical trials; use of the Hebrew version of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR).评估慢性精神分裂症住院患者参与临床试验时提供知情同意的能力;使用麦克阿瑟临床研究能力评估工具希伯来语版(MacCAT-CR)。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2012 Aug;14(8):470-4.
10
Validation of the French Version of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T) in a French Sample of Individuals with Schizophrenia: Validation de la version française de l'instrument d'évaluation des compétences MacArthur-traitement (MacCAT-T) dans un échantillon français de personnes souffrant de schizophrénie.验证 MacCAT-T 法语版在法国精神分裂症患者样本中的适用性:验证 MacCAT-T 法语版在法国精神分裂症患者样本中的适用性。
Can J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;66(4):395-405. doi: 10.1177/0706743720966443. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Capacity to consent: a scoping review of youth decision-making capacity for gender-affirming care.同意能力:性别肯定护理中青少年决策能力的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 8;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01107-y.
2
Experiences and preferences of truth-telling in families of children with cancer: A phenomenological study.癌症患儿家庭中告知真相的经历与偏好:一项现象学研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 May 3;11(6):100500. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100500. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
How to approach and take care of minor adolescents whose situations raise ethical dilemmas? a position paper of the European academy of pediatrics.如何应对和照顾那些情况引发伦理困境的未成年青少年?欧洲儿科学会立场文件。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 7;11:1120324. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120324. eCollection 2023.
4
Medical staff's sense of awareness of informed consent for adolescent cancer patients and the need for decision-making support practiced from the perspective of trauma-informed approach.从创伤知情角度出发,探讨医务工作者对青少年癌症患者知情同意意识和决策支持需求的实践。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 May 6;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00907-y.
5
Banking the Future: Adolescent Capacity to Consent to Biobank Research.为未来储备:青少年对生物样本库研究的同意能力。
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Jul;41(4):15-22. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500023.
6
Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects.儿童和青少年的医学决策:发育与神经科学方面
BMC Pediatr. 2017 May 8;17(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0869-x.
7
Is decision-making capacity an "essentially contested" concept in pediatrics?决策能力在儿科学中是一个“本质上有争议的”概念吗?
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Sep;20(3):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9768-z.
8
Treatment Decision-Making Capacity in Children and Adolescents Hospitalized for an Acute Mental Disorder: The Role of Cognitive Functioning and Psychiatric Symptoms.因急性精神障碍住院的儿童和青少年的治疗决策能力:认知功能和精神症状的作用。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017 Jun;27(5):462-465. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0092. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
Autonomy of the child in the South African context: is a 12 year old of sufficient maturity to consent to medical treatment?南非背景下儿童的自主权:12岁儿童是否具备足够的成熟度来同意接受医疗治疗?
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 2;17(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0150-0.
10
Personalized assent for pediatric biobanks.儿科生物样本库的个性化同意
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 12;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0142-0.

本文引用的文献

1
[Use, implementation and impact of the TEDDY network in Europe].[TEDDY网络在欧洲的使用、实施及影响]
Farm Hosp. 2012 Mar-Apr;36(2):109-10. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
2
Variability of judgments of capacity: experience of capacity evaluators in a study of research consent capacity.判断能力的变异性:研究研究同意能力中的能力评估者的经验。
Psychosomatics. 2011 Jul-Aug;52(4):346-53. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
3
Impact of the new european paediatric regulatory framework on ethics committees: overview and perspectives.新的欧洲儿科监管框架对伦理委员会的影响:概述与展望。
Acta Paediatr. 2012 Jan;101(1):e27-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02401.x. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
4
Pediatric oncologists' attitudes towards involving adolescents in decision-making concerning research participation.儿科肿瘤学家对让青少年参与研究参与决策的态度。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Jul 15;55(1):123-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22510.
5
Report of an initial pilot study on the feasibility of using the MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.关于使用麦克阿瑟能力评估工具对注意力缺陷/多动障碍儿童和青少年进行临床研究的可行性的初步试点研究报告。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2010 Feb;20(1):63-7. doi: 10.1089/cap.2008.0114.
6
How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence?儿科医生应如何评估吉列克能力?
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Apr;95(4):307-11. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.148676. Epub 2009 Nov 29.
7
Attitudes of physicians and parents towards discussing infertility risks and semen cryopreservation with male adolescents diagnosed with cancer.医生和家长对于与被诊断患有癌症的男性青少年讨论不孕风险及精液冷冻保存的态度。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Sep;53(3):386-91. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22091.
8
Mental capacity to make decisions on treatment in people admitted to psychiatric hospitals: cross sectional study.精神病医院住院患者做出治疗决策的心理能力:横断面研究
BMJ. 2008 Jun 30;337(7660):a448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39580.546597.BE.
9
[Ethics of medical scientific research: informed consent and the therapeutic misconception].[医学科研伦理:知情同意与治疗性误解]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Mar 22;152(12):679-83.
10
A review of children's decision-making competence in health care.儿童在医疗保健中的决策能力综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Dec;17(23):3131-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01920.x. Epub 2007 Nov 14.