Arunachalam Saravanan, Valencia Alejandro, Akita Yasuyuki, Serre Marc L, Omary Mohammad, Garcia Valerie, Isakov Vlad
Institute for the Environment, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100 Europa Drive, Suite 490, Chapel Hill, NC 27517, USA.
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Michael Hooker Research Center, 1305 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Oct 15;11(10):10518-36. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111010518.
Exposure studies rely on detailed characterization of air quality, either from sparsely located routine ambient monitors or from central monitoring sites that may lack spatial representativeness. Alternatively, some studies use models of various complexities to characterize local-scale air quality, but often with poor representation of background concentrations. A hybrid approach that addresses this drawback combines a regional-scale model to provide background concentrations and a local-scale model to assess impacts of local sources. However, this approach may double-count sources in the study regions. To address these limitations, we carefully define the background concentration as the concentration that would be measured if local sources were not present, and to estimate these background concentrations we developed a novel technique that combines space-time ordinary kriging (STOK) of observations with outputs from a detailed chemistry-transport model with local sources zeroed out. We applied this technique to support an exposure study in Detroit, Michigan, for several pollutants (including NOx and PM2.5), and evaluated the estimated hybrid concentrations (calculated by combining the background estimates that addresses this issue of double counting with local-scale dispersion model estimates) using observations. Our results demonstrate the strength of this approach specifically by eliminating the problem of double-counting reported in previous hybrid modeling approaches leading to improved estimates of background concentrations, and further highlight the relative importance of NOx vs. PM2.5 in their relative contributions to total concentrations. While a key limitation of this approach is the requirement for another detailed model simulation to avoid double-counting, STOK improves the overall characterization of background concentrations at very fine spatial scales.
暴露研究依赖于对空气质量的详细表征,这些表征数据要么来自分布稀疏的常规环境监测器,要么来自可能缺乏空间代表性的中心监测站点。另外,一些研究使用各种复杂程度的模型来表征局部尺度的空气质量,但背景浓度的表征往往较差。一种解决这一缺点的混合方法是结合一个区域尺度模型来提供背景浓度,以及一个局部尺度模型来评估本地源的影响。然而,这种方法可能会使研究区域内的源被重复计算。为了解决这些局限性,我们将背景浓度谨慎地定义为在不存在本地源时所测得的浓度,并且为了估算这些背景浓度,我们开发了一种新技术,该技术将观测值的时空普通克里金法(STOK)与一个将本地源归零的详细化学传输模型的输出结果相结合。我们将这项技术应用于支持在密歇根州底特律市进行的针对几种污染物(包括氮氧化物和细颗粒物2.5)的暴露研究,并利用观测数据评估了估算的混合浓度(通过将解决重复计算问题的背景估算值与局部尺度扩散模型估算值相结合来计算)。我们的结果证明了这种方法的优势,具体表现为消除了先前混合建模方法中报道的重复计算问题,从而改进了背景浓度的估算,并且进一步突出了氮氧化物与细颗粒物2.5在其对总浓度的相对贡献方面的相对重要性。虽然这种方法的一个关键局限性是需要进行另一次详细的模型模拟以避免重复计算,但时空普通克里金法在非常精细的空间尺度上改善了背景浓度的整体表征。