• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:600例患者的2年比较分析

Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A 2-year comparative analysis of 600 patients.

作者信息

Lakdawala Muffazal, Agarwal Aditi, Dhar Shilpa, Dhulla Neha, Remedios Carlyne, Bhasker Aparna Govil

机构信息

Center for Obesity and Digestive Surgery, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2015 Apr;25(4):607-14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1461-1.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-014-1461-1
PMID:25322809
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is a 2-year study to evaluate the feasibility; outcomes in terms of postoperative pain, weight loss, and complication rates; and cosmesis of the single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus the conventional multiport sleeve gastrectomy.

METHODS

A prospective comparative analysis was done in 300 patients in each arm who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and single-incision sleeve gastrectomy from September 2009 till January 2012. Both groups were matched for age and BMI. Postoperative pain scoring was done using visual analogue scale. Outcomes in terms of pain score, scar satisfaction score, excess weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities, and complications were compared in both groups at the end of 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.

RESULTS

Female patients preferred to undergo single-incision sleeve gastrectomy. Operating time and intraoperative blood loss were comparable in both groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scoring revealed lesser postoperative pain in the single-incision group. Excess weight loss and resolution of co-morbidities were also comparable in both groups at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Incisional hernia was seen in 3 patients (1%) in the single-incision group. Leak rate was comparable. Cosmetic satisfaction was superior in patients who underwent single-incision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical outcomes are comparable in both groups at the end of 2 years. The myth of high long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision surgery has been dispelled. Single-incision surgery is less painful with better cosmesis. It has come of age and should no longer be considered as an experimental procedure.

摘要

背景

这是一项为期两年的研究,旨在评估单切口袖状胃切除术与传统多端口袖状胃切除术的可行性;术后疼痛、体重减轻和并发症发生率方面的结果;以及美容效果。

方法

对2009年9月至2012年1月期间接受腹腔镜袖状胃切除术和单切口袖状胃切除术的每组300例患者进行前瞻性比较分析。两组在年龄和体重指数方面进行了匹配。术后疼痛评分采用视觉模拟量表。在6个月、1年和2年结束时,比较两组在疼痛评分、疤痕满意度评分、超重减轻、合并症缓解和并发症方面的结果。

结果

女性患者更倾向于接受单切口袖状胃切除术。两组的手术时间和术中出血量相当。视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分显示单切口组术后疼痛较轻。在6个月、1年和2年时,两组的超重减轻和合并症缓解情况也相当。单切口组有3例患者(1%)出现切口疝。渗漏率相当。接受单切口手术的患者美容满意度更高。

结论

两组在两年结束时的手术结果相当。单切口手术后长期切口疝发生率高的传言已被消除。单切口手术疼痛较轻,美容效果更好。它已经成熟,不应再被视为一种实验性手术。

相似文献

1
Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A 2-year comparative analysis of 600 patients.单孔袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:600例患者的2年比较分析
Obes Surg. 2015 Apr;25(4):607-14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1461-1.
2
Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--a randomised pilot study.单切口袖状胃切除术与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的随机对照研究
Obes Surg. 2011 Nov;21(11):1664-70. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0478-y.
3
Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of 80 cases in a single center.单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与多孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:单中心80例病例分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Feb;24(2):83-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0250. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
4
Prospective Comparison and Quality of Life for Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Series of Morbidly Obese Patients.一系列病态肥胖患者单切口与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的前瞻性比较及生活质量
Obes Surg. 2017 Mar;27(3):681-687. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2338-2.
5
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy achieve comparable weight loss at 1 year.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术在1年内实现的体重减轻效果相当。
Am Surg. 2012 Dec;78(12):1325-8.
6
Laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be performed through a single incision: a comparative study.腹腔镜减肥手术可通过单一切口进行:一项比较研究。
Obes Surg. 2014 Jul;24(7):1102-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1291-1.
7
Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 5-Year Follow-up of Weight Loss, Comorbidity Resolution, and Cost.单孔袖状胃切除术与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的比较:减重、合并症缓解和成本的 5 年随访结果。
Surg Innov. 2020 Jun;27(3):265-271. doi: 10.1177/1553350620902550. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
8
Short-term outcomes of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.单孔与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3978-3985. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07175-1. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
9
Does single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy result in improved short-term perioperative outcomes compared to conventional multi-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy?单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与传统多孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术相比,是否能改善短期围手术期结局?
Int J Surg. 2015 Oct;22:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
10
Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: A Meta-Analysis.单孔与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症的Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):690-699. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0245. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of complete gastric staple line bioabsorbable reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matched analysis.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中完全胃吻合钉线生物可吸收加固的评估:倾向评分匹配分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02326-7.
2
Single-port sleeve gastrectomy: a comparison between transumbilical and left hypochondrium approaches.单孔袖状胃切除术:经脐入路与左季肋部入路的比较
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2221-2227. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11529-3. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
3
Port Site Placement and Outcomes for Surgical Obesity and Metabolic Surgeries (PSPOSO) Checklist: A New Reporting Checklist Based on Evidential Assessment of the Number of Trocars and Positions.

本文引用的文献

1
SPIDER ® sleeve gastrectomy--a new concept in single-trocar bariatric surgery: initial experience and technical details.SPIDER®袖状胃切除术——单孔减重手术的新概念:初步经验及技术细节
J Visc Surg. 2014 Apr;151(2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
2
Five-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的 5 年结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Mar-Apr;10(2):243-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.06.024. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
3
Preventing staple-line leak in sleeve gastrectomy: reinforcement with bovine pericardium vs. oversewing.
外科肥胖与代谢手术的切口位置与结果(PSPOSO)检查表:基于对套管针数量和位置的证据评估制定的新报告检查表
Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):1086-1108. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07694-y. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
4
Needlescopic Laparoscope Sleeve Gastrectomy (NLSG): a Potential Surgical Approach.针状腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(NLSG):一种潜在的手术方法。
Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):257-262. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07636-0. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
5
Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.单切口与传统多端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:荟萃分析与系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Oct 13;15(10):e46956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46956. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Magnetic-Assisted Reduced-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Study.磁辅助小切口袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的对比研究。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jul;33(7):2261-2265. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06628-w. Epub 2023 May 20.
7
Application of single-port laparoscopic retrograde gastric mobilization during McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.单孔腹腔镜逆行胃游离术在食管癌McKeown食管切除术中的应用
Ann Thorac Med. 2023 Jan-Mar;18(1):39-44. doi: 10.4103/atm.atm_205_22. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
8
Utility of single-port laparoscopic retrograde gastric mobilization during McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 2-year experience with 120 cases in a single institution.单孔腹腔镜下逆行胃游离术在食管癌McKeown食管切除术中的应用:单中心120例患者的2年经验
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Oct;14(10):3983-3991. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1193.
9
Immediate postoperative pain does not predict pain at home after ambulatory single-port sleeve gastrectomy.门诊单孔袖状胃切除术术后即刻疼痛并不预测出院后疼痛。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Nov;407(7):2739-2746. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02560-2. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
10
Safety and effectiveness of reduced-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Asian morbidly obese patients.减少端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在亚洲病态肥胖患者中的安全性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 6;11(1):23511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02999-1.
胃袖状切除术预防吻合口漏:使用牛心包加强 vs. 缝合加固。
Obes Surg. 2013 Nov;23(11):1915-21. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1062-4.
4
Incisional hernia rate may increase after single-port cholecystectomy.单孔胆囊切除术后切口疝发生率可能会增加。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Oct;22(8):731-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0129.
5
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Do we need to oversew the staple line?腹腔镜袖状胃切除术。我们需要缝合钉合线吗?
Ann Ital Chir. 2011 Jul-Aug;82(4):273-7.
6
Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy--a randomised pilot study.单切口袖状胃切除术与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的随机对照研究
Obes Surg. 2011 Nov;21(11):1664-70. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0478-y.
7
Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: technical considerations and strategic modifications.单切口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与传统多孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:技术考虑和策略修改。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):658-64. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
8
Initial experience with laparoscopic crural closure in the management of hiatal hernia in obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.腹腔镜下关闭裂孔在肥胖患者行袖状胃切除术中治疗食管裂孔疝的初步经验。
Obes Surg. 2010 Aug;20(8):1149-53. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-0056-8. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
9
Single port access transumbilical laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the SILS Port: first reported case.使用单孔腹腔镜手术端口(SILS Port)的经脐单孔腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:首例报告病例。
Surg Innov. 2009 Dec;16(4):343-7. doi: 10.1177/1553350609354604. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
10
Comparison between the results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the Indian population: a retrospective 1 year study.印度人群中腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术结果的比较:一项回顾性 1 年研究。
Obes Surg. 2010 Jan;20(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9981-9. Epub 2009 Oct 3.