Suppr超能文献

应对方式、感知压力与健康相关行为:一种聚类分析方法

Coping profiles, perceived stress and health-related behaviors: a cluster analysis approach.

作者信息

Doron Julie, Trouillet Raphael, Maneveau Anaïs, Ninot Grégory, Neveu Dorine

机构信息

Laboratory Epsylon (EA 4556), Department of Sport and Physical Education Sciences, Southern France Montpellier University, Montpellier, France Laboratory LIRTES (EA 7313), Department of Sport and Physical Education Sciences, Paris-East Créteil University, Créteil, France.

Laboratory Epsylon (EA 4556), Department of Sport and Physical Education Sciences, Southern France Montpellier University, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2015 Mar;30(1):88-100. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau090. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

Abstract

Using cluster analytical procedure, this study aimed (i) to determine whether people could be differentiated on the basis of coping profiles (or unique combinations of coping strategies); and (ii) to examine the relationships between these profiles and perceived stress and health-related behaviors. A sample of 578 French students (345 females, 233 males; M(age)= 21.78, SD(age)= 2.21) completed the Perceived Stress Scale-14 ( Bruchon-Schweitzer, 2002), the Brief COPE ( Muller and Spitz, 2003) and a series of items measuring health-related behaviors. A two-phased cluster analytic procedure (i.e. hierarchical and non-hierarchical-k-means) was employed to derive clusters of coping strategy profiles. The results yielded four distinctive coping profiles: High Copers, Adaptive Copers, Avoidant Copers and Low Copers. The results showed that clusters differed significantly in perceived stress and health-related behaviors. High Copers and Avoidant Copers displayed higher levels of perceived stress and engaged more in unhealthy behavior, compared with Adaptive Copers and Low Copers who reported lower levels of stress and engaged more in healthy behaviors. These findings suggested that individuals' relative reliance on some strategies and de-emphasis on others may be a more advantageous way of understanding the manner in which individuals cope with stress. Therefore, cluster analysis approach may provide an advantage over more traditional statistical techniques by identifying distinct coping profiles that might best benefit from interventions. Future research should consider coping profiles to provide a deeper understanding of the relationships between coping strategies and health outcomes and to identify risk groups.

摘要

本研究采用聚类分析方法,旨在:(i)确定是否可以根据应对方式概况(或应对策略的独特组合)对人群进行区分;以及(ii)检验这些概况与感知压力和健康相关行为之间的关系。578名法国学生(345名女性,233名男性;年龄均值M = 21.78,标准差SD = 2.21)的样本完成了感知压力量表-14(布鲁雄-施韦策尔,2002年)、简易应对方式问卷(米勒和施皮茨,2003年)以及一系列测量健康相关行为的项目。采用两阶段聚类分析方法(即层次聚类和非层次k均值聚类)得出应对策略概况的类别。结果产生了四种不同的应对概况:积极应对者、适应性应对者、回避应对者和消极应对者。结果表明,不同类别在感知压力和健康相关行为方面存在显著差异。与报告压力水平较低且更多参与健康行为的适应性应对者和消极应对者相比,积极应对者和回避应对者表现出更高的感知压力水平,且更多地参与不健康行为。这些发现表明,个体对某些策略的相对依赖以及对其他策略的不重视可能是理解个体应对压力方式的更有利途径。因此,聚类分析方法可能比更传统的统计技术具有优势,因为它能够识别出可能最受益于干预措施的不同应对概况。未来的研究应考虑应对概况,以更深入地理解应对策略与健康结果之间的关系,并识别风险群体。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验