• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间左心室支持装置的应用

Use of left ventricular support devices during acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Spiro Jon, Doshi Sagar N

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK.

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Dec;16(12):544. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0544-x.

DOI:10.1007/s11886-014-0544-x
PMID:25326728
Abstract

In an effort to improve outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVADs) have been investigated in (1) high-risk PCI, (2) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) and (3) in AMI without CS. PCI has become an increasing complex due to an ageing population with complex disease and the frequent presence of impaired LV function. Patients undergoing high-risk PCI in these circumstances are prone to acute cardiovascular collapse. Additionally, mortality in AMI complicated by CS remains high. Lastly, LV support during AMI may reduce infarct size and therefore preserve LV function. At present, four commercially available devices exist: intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP), Impella, TandemHeart and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). These devices are employed in an effort to increase cardiac output, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and coronary perfusion and to reduce pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). The mechanism of action differs with each device, and there are advantages and disadvantages. In this update, we discuss recent data describing the use of PVADs to support patients with AMI with or without cardiogenic shock and during high-risk PCI. We focus on the unique features of each device, highlighting strengths, weaknesses and frequently encountered complications, which may be important when tailoring the most appropriate PVAD therapy to an individual patient's need.

摘要

为了改善经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的效果,人们对经皮心室辅助装置(PVADs)进行了研究,用于(1)高危PCI、(2)并发心源性休克(CS)的急性心肌梗死(AMI)以及(3)无CS的AMI。由于人口老龄化、疾病复杂以及左心室功能受损频繁出现,PCI变得越来越复杂。在这些情况下接受高危PCI的患者容易发生急性心血管崩溃。此外,并发CS的AMI患者死亡率仍然很高。最后,AMI期间的左心室支持可能会缩小梗死面积,从而保留左心室功能。目前,有四种市售装置:主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)、Impella、TandemHeart和体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)。使用这些装置旨在增加心输出量、平均动脉压(MAP)和冠状动脉灌注,并降低肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)。每种装置的作用机制不同,各有优缺点。在本综述中,我们讨论了描述使用PVADs支持有或无心源性休克的AMI患者以及高危PCI期间患者的最新数据。我们关注每种装置的独特特征,突出其优点、缺点和常见并发症,在根据个体患者需求定制最合适的PVAD治疗时,这些可能很重要。

相似文献

1
Use of left ventricular support devices during acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention.急性冠状动脉综合征和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间左心室支持装置的应用
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Dec;16(12):544. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0544-x.
2
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
3
[Temporary percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic literature review].[用于心源性休克和高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临时经皮心室辅助装置:一项系统文献综述]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2020 Feb;21(2):128-137. doi: 10.1714/3300.32706.
4
Prospective Comparison of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.经皮心室辅助装置与静脉动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗急性心肌梗死后心源性休克患者的前瞻性比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e012171. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012171.
5
Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持装置的情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037748. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37748.
6
Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.机械循环支持与单独使用血管加压素在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者中的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan;103(1):30-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30913. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
7
Can we have a rationalized selection of intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the catheterization laboratory?我们能否在导管室对主动脉内球囊反搏泵、Impella 和体外膜肺氧合进行合理化选择?
Cardiol J. 2022;29(1):115-132. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0182. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
8
The use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiogenic shock.经皮左心室辅助装置在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和心原性休克中的应用。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2013;14(2-4):e144-9. doi: 10.3909/ricm0675.
9
Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device vs. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Hemodynamic Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock and Coexistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Propensity-Matched Analysis'.经皮心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克合并心房颤动中的血流动力学支持比较:全国倾向匹配分析。
Am J Med Sci. 2021 Jan;361(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.08.018. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
10
The Use of Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices for ACS Patients with Cardiogenic Shock and High-Risk PCI.机械循环辅助装置在合并心原性休克和高危 PCI 的 ACS 患者中的应用。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Jun;24(6):699-709. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01688-3. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a nomogram for in-hospital mortality prediction in acute myocardialinfarction patients with cardiac arrest undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合支持的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心脏骤停急性心肌梗死患者院内死亡预测列线图的开发与验证
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 19;30(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-03004-5.
2
Benefits of prophylactic veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for high-risk cardiac interventions.预防性静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合用于高风险心脏介入治疗的益处。
BMC Surg. 2025 Mar 21;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02835-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump on prognostically important clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (from the PROTECT II randomized trial).在高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(来自 PROTECT II 随机试验)中,Impella 2.5 与主动脉内球囊泵对预后重要的临床结局的血流动力学支持的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 15;113(2):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.008.
2
The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry.Impella 2.5在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克中的当前应用:来自USpella注册研究的结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Feb;27(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/joic.12080. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
3
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to Support the Circulation in Interventional Cardiac Procedures.
体外膜肺氧合在介入性心脏手术中支持循环
Ann Card Anaesth. 2024 Jul 1;27(3):189-192. doi: 10.4103/aca.aca_122_24. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
4
Patient selection for left ventricular unloading: is lactate the vital piece of the puzzle?左心室卸载的患者选择:乳酸是难题的关键部分吗?
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Sep 28;15(9):4550-4554. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-987. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience.择期冠状动脉介入治疗高危患者中预防性体外膜肺氧合支持:单中心经验。
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 Feb 4;2023:5332038. doi: 10.1155/2023/5332038. eCollection 2023.
6
Effects and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.体外膜肺氧合治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 27;9:963002. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.963002. eCollection 2022.
7
Short-Term Outcomes of Elective High-Risk PCI with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Single-Centre Registry.体外膜肺氧合支持下择期高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的短期结果:单中心注册研究。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Sep 16;2022:7245384. doi: 10.1155/2022/7245384. eCollection 2022.
8
Contemporary device management of cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的当代设备管理
Heart Fail Rev. 2022 May;27(3):915-925. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10088-8. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
9
Prophylactic veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的预防性静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合
Neth Heart J. 2020 Mar;28(3):139-144. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-01350-8.
10
Current Concepts and New Trends in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克治疗的当前概念与新趋势
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2015 Mar 1;1(1):5-10. doi: 10.1515/jccm-2015-0002. eCollection 2015 Jan.
Which is better: a miniaturized percutaneous ventricular assist device or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for patients with cardiogenic shock?对于心源性休克患者,采用微型经皮心室辅助装置与体外膜肺氧合治疗,哪种方法更好?
ASAIO J. 2013 Nov-Dec;59(6):607-11. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182a8baf7.
4
Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.机械循环支持在心源休克中的应用。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jan;35(3):156-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht248. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
5
Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial.主动脉内球囊反搏在急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克中的应用(IABP-SHOCK II):一项随机、开放标签试验的最终 12 个月结果。
Lancet. 2013 Nov 16;382(9905):1638-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61783-3. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
6
Impella to unload the left ventricle during peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.在体外膜肺氧合期间使用 Impella 左心室辅助装置。
ASAIO J. 2013 Sep-Oct;59(5):533-6. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31829f0e52.
7
The outcome of intra-aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: a comprehensive meta-analysis.主动脉内球囊反搏支持在急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克患者中的应用效果:根据血运重建类型的综合荟萃分析。
Am Heart J. 2013 May;165(5):679-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
8
Lack of intra-aortic balloon pump effectiveness in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions without cardiogenic shock: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomised trials and observational studies.高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中主动脉内球囊泵效果不佳且无心源性休克:随机试验和观察性研究的综合荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1783-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.027. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
9
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29;61(4):485-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.018. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
10
Long-term mortality data from the balloon pump-assisted coronary intervention study (BCIS-1): a randomized, controlled trial of elective balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.球囊泵辅助冠状动脉介入治疗研究(BCIS-1)的长期死亡率数据:高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中选择性球囊反搏的随机对照试验。
Circulation. 2013 Jan 15;127(2):207-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.132209. Epub 2012 Dec 6.