Kode Swathi, Kallemeyn Nicole A, Smucker Joseph D, Fredericks Douglas C, Grosland Nicole M
Department of Biomedical Engineering The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA United States ; Center for Computer Aided Design The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA United States.
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA United States.
Iowa Orthop J. 2014;34:150-7.
Laminectomy has been regarded as a standard treatment for multi-level cervical stenosis. Concern for complications such as kyphosis has limited the indication of multi-level laminectomy; hence it is often augmented with an instrumented fusion. Laminoplasty has emerged as a motion preserving alternative. The purpose of this study was to compare the multidirectional flexibility of the cervical spine in response to a plate-only open door laminoplasty, double door laminoplasty, and laminectomy using a computational model. A validated three-dimensional finite element model of a specimen-specific intact cervical spine (C2-T1) was modified to simulate each surgical procedure at levels C3-C6. An additional goal of this work was to compare the instrumented computational model to our multi-specimen experimental findings to ensure similar trends in response to the surgical procedures. Model predictions indicate that mobility was retained following open and double door laminoplasty with a 5.4% and 20% increase in flexion, respectively, compared to the intact state. Laminectomy resulted in 57% increase in flexion as compared to the intact state, creating a concern for eventual kyphosis--a known risk/complication of multi-level laminectomy in the absence of fusion. Increased disc stresses were observed at the altered and adjacent segments post-laminectomy in flexion.
椎板切除术一直被视为多节段颈椎管狭窄的标准治疗方法。对诸如后凸畸形等并发症的担忧限制了多节段椎板切除术的适应症;因此,它通常会辅以器械融合术。椎板成形术已成为一种保留运动功能的替代方法。本研究的目的是使用计算模型比较仅行钢板开门式椎板成形术、双开门椎板成形术和椎板切除术对颈椎多向灵活性的影响。对一个经过验证的特定标本完整颈椎(C2-T1)的三维有限元模型进行修改,以模拟C3-C6节段的每种手术操作。这项工作的另一个目标是将器械化计算模型与我们的多标本实验结果进行比较,以确保在对手术操作的反应上有相似的趋势。模型预测表明,与完整状态相比,开门式和双开门椎板成形术后活动度得以保留,前屈分别增加了5.4%和20%。与完整状态相比,椎板切除术导致前屈增加了57%,这引发了对最终后凸畸形的担忧——这是多节段椎板切除术在未融合情况下已知的风险/并发症。在椎板切除术后的前屈过程中,在改变的节段和相邻节段观察到椎间盘应力增加。