• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿在与他人分享资源时会考虑优点。

Young children consider merit when sharing resources with others.

机构信息

School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043979. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0043979
PMID:22952834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3430625/
Abstract

MERIT IS A KEY PRINCIPLE OF FAIRNESS

rewards should be distributed according to how much someone contributed to a task. Previous research suggests that children have an early ability to take merit into account in third-party situations but that merit-based sharing in first-party contexts does not emerge until school-age. Here we provide evidence that three- and five-year-old children already use merit to share resources with others, even when sharing is costly for the child. In Study 1, a child and a puppet-partner collected coins that were later exchanged for rewards. We varied the work-contribution of both partners by manipulating how many coins each partner collected. Children kept fewer stickers in trials in which they had contributed less than in trials in which they had contributed more than the partner, showing that they took merit into account. Few children, however, gave away more than half of the stickers when the partner had worked more. Study 2 confirmed that children related their own work-contribution to their partner's, rather than simply focusing on their own contribution. Taken together, these studies show that merit-based sharing is apparent in young children; however it remains constrained by a self-serving bias.

摘要

功绩是公平的关键原则

奖励应该根据一个人对任务的贡献程度来分配。先前的研究表明,儿童在第三方情境中具有早期考虑功绩的能力,但在第一方情境中基于功绩的分享直到学龄期才出现。在这里,我们提供的证据表明,三岁和五岁的儿童已经可以利用功绩与他人分享资源,即使分享对儿童来说是有代价的。在研究 1 中,一个孩子和一个木偶伙伴收集硬币,这些硬币后来被用来交换奖励。我们通过操纵每个伙伴收集的硬币数量来改变两个伙伴的工作贡献。与贡献较少的试验相比,孩子们在贡献较多的试验中保留的贴纸较少,这表明他们考虑了功绩。然而,当伙伴的工作量更大时,很少有孩子会放弃超过一半的贴纸。研究 2 证实,孩子们将自己的工作贡献与伙伴的工作贡献联系起来,而不是仅仅关注自己的贡献。总的来说,这些研究表明,基于功绩的分享在年幼的儿童中是明显的;然而,它仍然受到自利偏见的限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f55/3430625/9682c131dc4b/pone.0043979.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f55/3430625/eb88212cced8/pone.0043979.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f55/3430625/9a4ec2381761/pone.0043979.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f55/3430625/9682c131dc4b/pone.0043979.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f55/3430625/eb88212cced8/pone.0043979.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f55/3430625/9a4ec2381761/pone.0043979.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f55/3430625/9682c131dc4b/pone.0043979.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Young children consider merit when sharing resources with others.幼儿在与他人分享资源时会考虑优点。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043979. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
2
Children's consideration of collaboration and merit when making sharing decisions in private.儿童在私下做出分享决定时对合作和功绩的考量。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Apr;228:105609. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105609. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
3
Preschool children involve a third party in a dyadic sharing situation based on fairness.学前儿童基于公平原则将第三方卷入到二元分享情境中。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Sep;116(1):78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.12.014. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
4
Merit overrules theory of mind when young children share resources with others.当幼儿与他人分享资源时,优点会胜过心理理论。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 3;15(1):e0227375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227375. eCollection 2020.
5
Chimpanzees play the ultimatum game.黑猩猩玩最后通牒游戏。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 5;110(6):2070-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220806110. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
6
Meritocratic sharing is based on collaboration in 3-year-olds.功绩制分享以 3 岁儿童的合作为基础。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jan;50(1):121-8. doi: 10.1037/a0032965. Epub 2013 May 20.
7
Children engage in competitive altruism.儿童会参与竞争型利他主义行为。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Mar;179:176-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
8
The influence of intention and outcome on young children's reciprocal sharing.意图和结果对幼儿互惠分享的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Nov;187:104645. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
9
Extrinsic Rewards Diminish Costly Sharing in 3-Year-Olds.外在奖励会减少三岁儿童的高成本分享行为。
Child Dev. 2016 Jul;87(4):1192-203. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12534. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
10
Just rewards: 17-Month-old infants expect agents to take resources according to the principles of distributive justice.应得的奖励:17个月大的婴儿期望行为主体根据分配公平原则获取资源。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Aug;172:25-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Recipients' Inter-Group Relations and Routine Behaviors in the Development of Children's Sharing Behavior.受助者群体间关系及日常行为在儿童分享行为发展中的作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 23;15(3):254. doi: 10.3390/bs15030254.
2
Children consider others' need and reputation in costly sharing decisions.儿童在代价高昂的分享决策中会考虑他人的需求和声誉。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 27;15(1):7103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91648-y.
3
People reward others based on their willingness to exert effort.人们根据他人付出努力的意愿来给予回报。

本文引用的文献

1
Do infants have a sense of fairness?婴儿有公平感吗?
Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;23(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/0956797611422072. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
2
Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods.学龄前儿童在分配物品时能够考虑到优点。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):492-8. doi: 10.1037/a0026598. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
3
Collaboration promotes proportional reasoning about resource distribution in young children.合作促进幼儿对资源分配的比例推理。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2025 Jan;116. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104699. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
4
Is Distributional Justice Equivalent to Prosocial Sharing in Children's Cognition?儿童认知中的分配正义等同于亲社会分享吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 12;13:888028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888028. eCollection 2022.
5
The influence of collaboration and culture on the IKEA effect: Does cocreation alter perceptions of value in British and Indian children?合作和文化对 IKEA 效应的影响:共同创造是否改变了英印儿童对价值的认知?
Dev Psychol. 2022 Apr;58(4):662-670. doi: 10.1037/dev0001321.
6
Young children share more under time pressure than after a delay.与延迟后相比,幼儿在时间压力下分享得更多。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 16;16(3):e0248121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248121. eCollection 2021.
7
Perspective taking as a mechanism for children's developing preferences for equitable distributions.换位思考作为儿童形成公平分配偏好的机制。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 11;11(1):5689. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84968-2.
8
Why do preschoolers perpetuate inequalities? Theoretical perspectives on inequity preferences in the face of emerging concerns for equality.为什么学龄前儿童会延续不平等?面对新出现的平等问题,关于不公平偏好的理论观点。
Dev Rev. 2020 Dec;58:100933. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2020.100933.
9
Children's evaluations of individually and structurally based inequalities: The role of status.儿童对个体和结构基础上的不平等的评价:地位的作用。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Dec;56(12):2223-2235. doi: 10.1037/dev0001118. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
10
Merit overrules theory of mind when young children share resources with others.当幼儿与他人分享资源时,优点会胜过心理理论。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 3;15(1):e0227375. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227375. eCollection 2020.
Dev Psychol. 2011 Sep;47(5):1230-8. doi: 10.1037/a0024923.
4
Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees.合作鼓励孩子们平等分享,但黑猩猩并非如此。
Nature. 2011 Jul 20;476(7360):328-31. doi: 10.1038/nature10278.
5
"I had so much it didn't seem fair": Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity.“我得到的太多了,这不公平”:八岁儿童拒绝两种形式的不公平。
Cognition. 2011 Aug;120(2):215-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 26.
6
Young children share the spoils after collaboration.幼儿在合作后分享成果。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Feb;22(2):267-73. doi: 10.1177/0956797610395392. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
7
Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance.公平与不平等接受度的发展。
Science. 2010 May 28;328(5982):1176-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1187300.