Morjaria Rupal, Sood Vaneeta, Manavi Kaveh, Denniston Alastair K, Palmer Helen
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom ; Nuffield Department of Ophthalmology, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Oct 3;8:2029-34. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S67493. eCollection 2014.
Before highly active antiretroviral therapy, cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis was a major threat to vision in individuals with HIV. We investigate whether ophthalmic screening of asymptomatic HIV patients still has value in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era and consider CD4 thresholds in line with the world literature and UK experience.
A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients seen by the HIV Ophthalmic Service of a UK university hospital both before (2007-2008) and after (2011-2012) introduction of a threshold of CD4 lower than 100 cells/mm(3). Data collected included CMV and HIV RNA load, CD4 cell counts and CD4 percentage, CMV-immunoglobulin G status, ocular symptoms, and evidence of HIV-related ocular disease.
In total, 54 patients were referred to the HIV ophthalmic service. Three patients failed to attend, resulting in complete data for 51 patients (n=24 for 2007-2008; n=27 for 2011-2012). Seven patients had ophthalmic manifestations of their HIV; these cases had lower CD4 counts than those with normal examinations (median [interquartile range], 9 [7-80] versus 175 [44-394]; P=0.0039; Mann-Whitney test). Six cases had HIV retinopathy without sight loss; one case had sight-threatening CMV retinitis associated with a CD4 count of 6 cells/mm(3).
Before 2008, our practice was to screen all asymptomatic patients with CD4 counts lower than 200 cells/mm(3). Screening asymptomatic patients with CD4 counts below 100 cells/mm(3) was not associated with any missed or late-presenting cases of CMV retinitis in our HIV population.
在高效抗逆转录病毒治疗之前,巨细胞病毒(CMV)视网膜炎是HIV感染者视力的主要威胁。我们调查了在高效抗逆转录病毒治疗时代,对无症状HIV患者进行眼科筛查是否仍有价值,并参考世界文献和英国经验来考虑CD4阈值。
对英国一家大学医院HIV眼科服务部门在引入CD4低于100个细胞/mm³阈值之前(2007 - 2008年)和之后(2011 - 2012年)诊治的所有患者进行回顾性病历审查。收集的数据包括CMV和HIV RNA载量、CD4细胞计数和CD4百分比、CMV - 免疫球蛋白G状态、眼部症状以及HIV相关眼病的证据。
共有54名患者被转诊至HIV眼科服务部门。3名患者未就诊,51名患者有完整数据(2007 - 2008年为24例;2011 - 2012年为27例)。7名患者有HIV的眼科表现;这些病例的CD4计数低于检查正常的患者(中位数[四分位间距],9[7 - 80]对175[44 - 394];P = 0.0039;曼 - 惠特尼检验)。6例有HIV视网膜病变但未失明;1例有威胁视力的CMV视网膜炎,其CD4计数为6个细胞/mm³。
2008年之前,我们的做法是对所有CD4计数低于200个细胞/mm³的无症状患者进行筛查。对CD4计数低于100个细胞/mm³的无症状患者进行筛查,在我们的HIV人群中未发现任何CMV视网膜炎漏诊或延迟就诊的病例。