Kang Seung Hun, Kwon Jee Young, Lee Jong Kwon, Seo Young Rok
Department of Life Science, Institute of Environmental Medicine for Green Chemistry, Dongguk University, Seoul.
Toxicological Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation (NIFDS), Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA), Cheongwon, Korea.
J Cancer Prev. 2013 Dec;18(4):277-88. doi: 10.15430/jcp.2013.18.4.277.
Genotoxic events have been known as crucial step in the initiation of cancer. To assess the risk of cancer, genotoxicity assays, including comet, micronucleus (MN), chromosomal aberration, bacterial reverse, and sister chromatid exchange assay, can be performed. Compared with in vitro genotoxicity assay, in vivo genotoxicity assay has been used to verify in vitro assay result and definitely provide biological significance for certain organs or cell types. The comet assay can detect DNA strand breaks as markers of genotoxicity. Methods of the in vivo comet assay have been established by Japanese Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (JaCVAM) validation studies depending on tissue and sample types. The MN can be initiated by segregation error and lagging acentric chromosome fragment. Methods of the in vivo MN assay have been established by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guidelines and many studies. Combining the in vivo comet and MN assay has been regarded as useful methodology for evaluating genetic damage, and it has been used in the assessment of potential carcinogenicity by complementarily presenting two distinct endpoints of the in vivo genotoxicity individual test. Few studies have investigated the quantitative relation between in vivo genotoxicity results and carcinogenicity. Extensive studies emphasizes that positive correlation is detectable. This review summarizes the results of the in vivo comet and MN assays that have investigated the genotoxicity of carcinogens as classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) carcinogenicity database. As a result, these genotoxicity data may provide meaningful information for the assessment of potential carcinogenicity and for implementation in the prevention of cancer.
遗传毒性事件被认为是癌症发生的关键步骤。为了评估癌症风险,可以进行包括彗星试验、微核试验、染色体畸变试验、细菌回复突变试验和姐妹染色单体交换试验在内的遗传毒性检测。与体外遗传毒性检测相比,体内遗传毒性检测已被用于验证体外检测结果,并明确为某些器官或细胞类型提供生物学意义。彗星试验可以检测DNA链断裂作为遗传毒性的标志物。日本替代方法验证中心(JaCVAM)的验证研究根据组织和样品类型建立了体内彗星试验方法。微核可由分离错误和落后的无着丝粒染色体片段引发。体内微核试验方法已由经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的试验指南及许多研究建立。将体内彗星试验和微核试验结合起来被认为是评估遗传损伤的有用方法,并且它已被用于通过互补呈现体内遗传毒性个体试验的两个不同终点来评估潜在致癌性。很少有研究调查体内遗传毒性结果与致癌性之间的定量关系。大量研究强调两者之间存在可检测到的正相关。本综述总结了根据国际癌症研究机构(IARC)致癌性数据库分类的、研究致癌物遗传毒性的体内彗星试验和微核试验的结果。因此,这些遗传毒性数据可能为评估潜在致癌性和在癌症预防中的应用提供有意义的信息。