公众参与：不只是一种方法？：评“通过公民陪审团挖掘量化公众对医疗保健重点偏好的潜力”。
Public participation: more than a method?: Comment on "Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries".
机构信息
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, St George's, University of London and Kingston University, London, UK.
Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. ; University of Warwick, London, UK. ; University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
出版信息
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Oct 15;3(5):291-3. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.102. eCollection 2014 Oct.
Abstract
While it is important to support the development of methods for public participation, we argue that this should not be at the expense of a broader consideration of the role of public participation. We suggest that a rights based approach provides a framework for developing more meaningful approaches that move beyond public participation as synonymous with consultation to value the contribution of lay knowledge to the governance of health systems and health research.
摘要
虽然支持开发公众参与的方法很重要，但我们认为这不应该以更广泛地考虑公众参与的作用为代价。我们认为，基于权利的方法为制定更有意义的方法提供了一个框架，这些方法超越了将公众参与等同于咨询的概念，而是重视非专业知识对卫生系统和卫生研究治理的贡献。
相似文献
1
Public participation: more than a method?: Comment on "Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries".公众参与：不只是一种方法？：评“通过公民陪审团挖掘量化公众对医疗保健重点偏好的潜力”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Oct 15;3(5):291-3. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.102. eCollection 2014 Oct.
2
Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries.利用公民陪审团来量化公众对医疗保健重点的偏好。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Jun 16;3(2):57-62. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.61. eCollection 2014 Jul.
3
From passive subject to active agent: the potential of Citizens' Juries for nursing research.从被动参与者到积极推动者：公民陪审团在护理研究中的潜力。
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Oct;27(7):788-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
4
The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.公民陪审团在卫生政策决策中的应用：系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;109:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
5
Investigating the Extent to Which Patients Should Control Access to Patient Records for Research: A Deliberative Process Using Citizens' Juries.调查患者在多大程度上应控制用于研究的患者记录的访问权限：使用公民陪审团的审议过程
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 28;20(3):e112. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7763.
6
Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: quantifying preferences for healthcare through citizens' juries.让公众参与医疗保健决策：通过公民陪审团量化对医疗保健的偏好。
BMJ Open. 2014 May 2;4(5):e005437. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005437.
7
Assessing the impact of deliberative processes on the views of participants: is it 'in one ear and out the other'?评估审议过程对参与者观点的影响：是“一听了之”吗？
Health Expect. 2014 Apr;17(2):278-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00749.x. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
8
Public Engagement through Inclusive Deliberation: The Human Genome International Commission and Citizens' Juries.公众参与包容性审议：人类基因组国际委员会和公民陪审团。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Dec;23(12):66-76. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2146786. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
9
Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.规划研究重点中的公民陪审团：过程、参与度与结果
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):272-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00502.x.
10
Evaluating the use of citizens' juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation.评估公民陪审团在食品政策中的使用：以食品监管为例。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 19;13:596. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-596.
引用本文的文献
1
'It is still coming from the centre and coming out': The material conditions adding to over-bureaucratised patient and public involvement for commissioning health and care in England.“它仍然来自中心，并从中输出”：英格兰在委托卫生和保健服务时，增加了过度官僚化的患者和公众参与的物质条件。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1636-1647. doi: 10.1111/hex.13768. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
2
Creating sustainable health care systems.创建可持续的医疗保健系统。
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 Mar 18;33(1):18-34. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2018-0065. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
3
Public participation: methods matter; a response to Boaz et al.公众参与：方法很重要；对博阿兹等人的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Oct 26;3(6):355. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.108. eCollection 2014 Nov.
本文引用的文献
1
Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries.利用公民陪审团来量化公众对医疗保健重点的偏好。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Jun 16;3(2):57-62. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.61. eCollection 2014 Jul.
2
Resources, attitudes and culture: an understanding of the factors that influence the functioning of accountability mechanisms in primary health care settings.资源、态度和文化：理解影响初级卫生保健环境中问责机制运作的因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 16;13:320. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-320.
3
The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review.患者和公众参与对英国国民保健制度医疗保健的影响：系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Feb;24(1):28-38. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr066. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
4
Beyond compassion: the central role of accountability in applying a human rights framework to health.超越同情：在将人权框架应用于卫生保健中问责制的核心作用。
Health Hum Rights. 2008;10(2):1-20.
5
Suffering and powerlessness: the significance of promoting participation in rights-based approaches to health.痛苦和无力感：在基于权利的健康方法中促进参与的意义。
Health Hum Rights. 2009;11(1):5-22.
6
A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.一个用于分析公众参与卫生服务研究的多维概念框架。
Health Expect. 2008 Mar;11(1):72-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00476.x.
Zotero 插件