Suppr超能文献

痛苦和无力感:在基于权利的健康方法中促进参与的意义。

Suffering and powerlessness: the significance of promoting participation in rights-based approaches to health.

机构信息

Harvard Law School, USA.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2009;11(1):5-22.

Abstract

In a rights framework, participation is inextricably related to power. Through effective participation, we can challenge political and other forms of exclusion that prevent people from having power over the decisions and processes that affect their lives and health. Yet concepts of power are as contested as notions of participation. Thus, I argue here that, far from there being a formula for what participation means in a rights-based approach to health, the way in which we conceptualize the role of participation is closely linked to how we understand power and, in turn, the purpose and meaning of human rights themselves. I outline three ways of thinking about domination and participation-as-empowerment. In a liberal understanding of how power operates, there is an overarching concern for ensuring processes of participation that enable competing groups to express their voices on the proverbial level playing field, so that no one group may impose its will on the others. Critics of this approach assert that it ignores the power relations in which participatory processes are embedded, which determine which of the issues that affect health get decided--and which issues are never brought to the table because they are systematically blocked. If a second dimension of power entails deciding what gets decided, participatory approaches need to challenge the definition of what is "up for contention," or they risk merely legitimating social control. A third dimension of power entails securing compliance from oppressed groups by shaping their perceptions of their own interests. A human rights-based approach concerned with the effects of this form of domination on people's health calls for developing critical consciousness before there can be any truly "empowering" participation. I conclude by arguing that much is at stake in defining participation in a human rights framework to health, because in defining what we are calling for, we will determine how relevant human rights are to the daily struggles of people around the world for well-being.

摘要

在权利框架中,参与与权力密不可分。通过有效的参与,我们可以挑战政治和其他形式的排斥,这些排斥阻止人们对影响他们生活和健康的决策和过程拥有权力。然而,权力的概念和参与的概念一样具有争议性。因此,我在这里认为,在基于权利的健康方法中,参与的含义远没有一个公式,我们对参与角色的概念化与我们对权力的理解密切相关,进而与人类权利本身的目的和意义密切相关。我概述了三种思考支配和赋权参与的方式。在对权力运作的自由理解中,首要关注的是确保参与过程,使竞争群体能够在所谓的公平竞争环境中表达自己的意见,从而使任何一个群体都不会将自己的意志强加给其他群体。这种方法的批评者断言,它忽略了参与过程中嵌入的权力关系,这些关系决定了哪些影响健康的问题得到解决,而哪些问题从未被提上议事日程,因为它们被系统地阻止了。如果权力的第二个维度意味着决定什么是可以决定的,那么参与方法就需要挑战什么是“有争议的”的定义,否则它们就有可能只是使社会控制合法化。权力的第三个维度涉及通过塑造受压迫群体对自己利益的看法来确保他们的服从。关注这种形式的支配对人们健康的影响的基于人权的方法要求在进行任何真正的“赋权”参与之前,先培养批判意识。最后,我认为,在人权框架内对健康参与进行定义存在很大的风险,因为在定义我们所要求的内容时,我们将决定人权对全世界人民为福祉而进行的日常斗争的相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验