Mills Katie, Emery Jon, Cheung Camilla, Hall Nicola, Birt Linda, Walter Fiona M
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Oct 25;15:167. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0167-8.
Late diagnosis is considered to be a major factor contributing to poorer cancer survival rates in the UK. Interventions have focussed on the promotion of earlier diagnosis in patients with potential cancer symptoms. However, to assess the effectiveness of these interventions, the time from symptom onset to presentation needs to be reliably and accurately measured. This qualitative study explored the use of calendar landmarking instruments in cancer symptom research.
We performed a secondary analysis of transcripts of interviews using the calendar landmarking instrument, undertaken with patients who had either been diagnosed with cancer (n = 40, IRCO study, Western Australia), or who had symptoms suggestive of cancer (n = 38, SYMPTOM study, North East and Eastern England). We used constant comparison methods to identify use of the calendar landmarking instruments and the impact of their application.
The calendar landmarking instrument appeared to help many patients, either by acting as a prompt or helping to refine recall of events. A combination of personal (e.g. birthday) and national (e.g. Christmas) landmarks seemed to be the most effective. Calendar landmarking instruments appeared more useful where the time period between onset of symptoms and date of first consultation was less than three months. The interviewee's age, gender and cancer type did not appear to influence whether or not the instrument facilitated recall, and there were no instances where the use of the instrument resulted in the disclosure of a new first symptom. Symptoms of similar chronic conditions could create difficulties when applying the instrument; it was difficult for these participants to characterise and disentangle their symptoms which prompted their decisions to seek help. Some participants tended to prefer to use their own, already personalised, diaries to assist in their recall of events.
This study is the first to describe the potential role of calendar landmarking instruments to support research interviews which explore symptoms and events along the cancer diagnostic pathway. The major challenge remains as to whether they actually improve accuracy of recall.
在英国,晚期诊断被认为是导致癌症生存率较低的一个主要因素。干预措施主要集中在促进对有潜在癌症症状的患者进行早期诊断。然而,为了评估这些干预措施的有效性,需要可靠且准确地测量从症状出现到就诊的时间。这项定性研究探讨了日历标志性工具在癌症症状研究中的应用。
我们对使用日历标志性工具进行访谈的文字记录进行了二次分析,这些访谈对象包括已被诊断患有癌症的患者(n = 40,IRCO研究,西澳大利亚),或有癌症疑似症状的患者(n = 38,SYMPTOM研究,英格兰东北部和东部)。我们采用持续比较法来确定日历标志性工具的使用情况及其应用的影响。
日历标志性工具似乎对许多患者有帮助,要么作为一种提示,要么有助于完善对事件的回忆。个人(如生日)和国家(如圣诞节)标志性事件的组合似乎最有效。在症状出现到首次咨询日期之间的时间段少于三个月时,日历标志性工具似乎更有用。受访者的年龄、性别和癌症类型似乎并未影响该工具是否有助于回忆,且没有出现使用该工具导致新的首发症状被披露的情况。在应用该工具时,类似慢性病的症状可能会造成困难;这些参与者难以描述和区分促使他们寻求帮助的症状。一些参与者倾向于使用自己已经个性化的日记来帮助回忆事件。
本研究首次描述了日历标志性工具在支持探索癌症诊断路径上的症状和事件的研究访谈中的潜在作用。主要挑战仍然是它们是否真的能提高回忆的准确性。