Zeanah Charles H, Gleason Mary Margaret
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Institute of Infant and Early Childhood Mental Health, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):207-22. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12347. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
Though noted in the clinical literature for more than 50 years, attachment disorders have been studied systematically only recently. In part because of the ubiquity of attachments in humans, determining when aberrant behavior is best explained as an attachment disorder as opposed to insecure attachment has led to some confusion. In this selective review, we consider the literature on reactive attachment disorder and disinhibited social engagement disorder and describe an emerging consensus about a number of issues, while also noting some areas of controversy and others where we lack clear answers. We include a brief history of the classification of the disorders, as well as measurement issues. We describe their clinical presentation, causes and vulnerability factors, and clinical correlates, including the relation of disorders to secure and insecure attachment classifications. We also review what little is known and what more we need to learn about interventions.
We conducted a literature search using PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases, using search terms 'reactive attachment disorder,' 'attachment disorder,' 'indiscriminate behavior,' 'indiscriminate friendliness,' 'indiscriminate socially disinhibited reactive attachment disorder,' 'disinhibited social engagement disorder,' and 'disinhibited social behavior.' We also contacted investigators who have published on these topics.
A growing literature has assessed behaviors in children who have experienced various types of adverse caregiving environments reflecting signs of putative attachment disorders, though fewer studies have investigated categorically defined attachment disorders. The evidence for two separate disorders is considerable, with reactive attachment disorder indicating children who lack attachments despite the developmental capacity to form them, and disinhibited social engagement disorder indicating children who lack developmentally appropriate reticence with unfamiliar adults and who violate socially sanctioned boundaries.
Although many questions remain to be answered, especially regarding appropriate interventions, we know considerably more about attachment disorders than we did only a decade ago.
尽管依恋障碍在临床文献中已被提及50多年,但直到最近才得到系统研究。部分由于依恋在人类中普遍存在,确定何时异常行为最好被解释为依恋障碍而非不安全依恋,这导致了一些困惑。在这篇选择性综述中,我们审视了关于反应性依恋障碍和去抑制性社会参与障碍的文献,并描述了在一些问题上正在形成的共识,同时也指出了一些争议领域以及我们缺乏明确答案的其他方面。我们包括了这些障碍分类的简要历史以及测量问题。我们描述了它们的临床表现、病因和易患因素,以及临床相关因素,包括这些障碍与安全和不安全依恋分类的关系。我们还回顾了关于干预措施我们已知甚少以及还需要了解更多的内容。
我们使用PubMed、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行文献检索,检索词为“反应性依恋障碍”、“依恋障碍”、“不加选择的行为”、“不加选择的友好”、“不加选择的社交去抑制性反应性依恋障碍”、“去抑制性社会参与障碍”和“去抑制性社会行为”。我们还联系了在这些主题上发表过文章的研究人员。
越来越多的文献评估了经历过各种类型不良养育环境的儿童的行为,这些行为反映了假定的依恋障碍的迹象,尽管较少有研究调查明确界定的依恋障碍。有相当多的证据支持这两种不同的障碍,反应性依恋障碍表明儿童尽管有形成依恋的发育能力但却缺乏依恋,而去抑制性社会参与障碍表明儿童在与不熟悉的成年人交往时缺乏与其发育阶段相适应的含蓄,并且违反社会认可的界限。
尽管仍有许多问题有待解答,尤其是关于适当的干预措施,但与仅仅十年前相比,我们对依恋障碍的了解已经多得多了。