• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阈下微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效受治疗前中心凹厚度的影响。

Efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser in the treatment of diabetic macular edema is influenced by pre-treatment central foveal thickness.

作者信息

Mansouri A, Sampat K M, Malik K J, Steiner J N, Glaser B M

机构信息

The National Retina Institute, Towson, MD, USA.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2014 Dec;28(12):1418-24. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.264. Epub 2014 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1038/eye.2014.264
PMID:25359290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4268471/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine if the severity of diabetic macular edema influences the effectiveness of subthreshold micropulse (STMP) laser treatment.

METHODS

A total of 63 eyes of 58 patients with diabetic macular edema were divided into two groups based on their initial central foveal thickness (CFT). Group 1 had CFT ≤400 μm, group 2 had CFT >400 μm. The change from baseline in CFT and visual acuity were compared at 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up. Patients were considered for retreatment with micropulse laser at 3 months if macular edema had not improved. Patients were considered for rescue anti-VEGF injections if there was clinically significant macular edema at 6 months follow-up. Number of laser retreatments, injections, and any adverse effects from STMP laser were recorded.

RESULTS

Group 1 (n=33) experienced an average of 55 μm reduction in CFT and 0.2 log MAR gain in visual acuity at 12 months (P<0.001). No patient required rescue anti-VEGF injections. Group 2 (n=30) experienced no significant change in CFT or visual acuity by 6 months despite retreatment with STMP in 19 eyes. From 6 to 12 months follow-up, all the patients in group 2 received rescue Bevacizumab injections that resulted in 307 μm reduction in CFT and 0.3 log MAR improvement in visual acuity (P<0.001). No adverse effects from STMP laser were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Severity of edema can influence the effects of STMP laser. STMP monotherapy is safe and effective in treating edema of mild to moderate severity.

摘要

目的

确定糖尿病性黄斑水肿的严重程度是否会影响阈下微脉冲(STMP)激光治疗的效果。

方法

将58例糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的63只眼根据初始中心凹厚度(CFT)分为两组。第1组CFT≤400μm,第2组CFT>400μm。在随访3、6和12个月时比较CFT和视力相对于基线的变化。如果黄斑水肿在3个月时没有改善,则考虑对患者进行微脉冲激光再治疗。如果在随访6个月时有临床上显著的黄斑水肿,则考虑进行挽救性抗VEGF注射。记录激光再治疗次数、注射次数以及STMP激光的任何不良反应。

结果

第1组(n = 33)在12个月时CFT平均降低55μm,视力提高0.2 log MAR(P<0.001)。没有患者需要挽救性抗VEGF注射。第2组(n = 30)尽管19只眼进行了STMP再治疗,但到6个月时CFT和视力均无显著变化。在6至12个月的随访中,第2组的所有患者均接受了挽救性贝伐单抗注射,导致CFT降低307μm,视力提高0.3 log MAR(P<0.001)。未记录到STMP激光的不良反应。

结论

水肿的严重程度可影响STMP激光的疗效。STMP单一疗法在治疗轻度至中度水肿方面安全有效。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser in the treatment of diabetic macular edema is influenced by pre-treatment central foveal thickness.阈下微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效受治疗前中心凹厚度的影响。
Eye (Lond). 2014 Dec;28(12):1418-24. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.264. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
2
The impact of central foveal thickness on the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema.中心凹厚度对阈下微脉冲黄色激光光凝治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿疗效的影响
Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Jul;34(5):907-912. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2672-9. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
3
Microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence in diabetic macular edema: subthreshold micropulse diode laser versus modified early treatment diabetic retinopathy study laser photocoagulation.微视野计和眼底自发荧光在糖尿病性黄斑水肿中的应用:阈下微脉冲二极管激光与改良早期治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变研究激光光凝比较。
Retina. 2010 Jun;30(6):908-16. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c96986.
4
Safety of transfoveal subthreshold diode micropulse laser for fovea-involving diabetic macular edema in eyes with good visual acuity.经黄斑中心凹阈下二极管微脉冲激光治疗对视力良好的累及黄斑中心凹的糖尿病性黄斑水肿的安全性。
Retina. 2014 Oct;34(10):2010-20. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000177.
5
SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE YELLOW LASER VERSUS SUBTHRESHOLD MICROPULSE INFRARED LASER IN CENTER-INVOLVING DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA: Morphologic and Functional Safety.中心累及性糖尿病性黄斑水肿中阈下微脉冲黄色激光与阈下微脉冲红外激光的比较:形态学和功能安全性
Retina. 2015 Aug;35(8):1594-603. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000521.
6
The efficacy of selective retina therapy for diabetic macular edema based on pretreatment central foveal thickness.基于预处理中心凹视网膜厚度的糖尿病性黄斑水肿选择性视网膜光凝治疗的疗效。
Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Oct;35(8):1781-1790. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-02984-6. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
7
Comparison of short-pulse subthreshold (532 nm) and infrared micropulse (810 nm) macular laser for diabetic macular edema.比较治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的短脉冲亚阈值(532nm)和红外微脉冲(810nm)黄斑激光。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79699-9.
8
Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema.阈下微脉冲激光减轻糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者抗VEGF注射负担。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;28(1):68-73. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5001000.
9
Can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? A randomized clinical trial.亚阈值微脉冲黄光疗法能否改变糖尿病黄斑水肿的抗血管内皮生长因子治疗方案?一项随机临床试验。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;68(1):145-151. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_350_19.
10
Subthreshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema in Japanese patients.亚阈值微脉冲二极管激光光凝治疗日本糖尿病黄斑水肿患者的疗效观察。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;149(1):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser combined with anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估阈下微脉冲激光联合抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 28;16:1553311. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1553311. eCollection 2025.
2
Settings and Clinical Applications of Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Therapy: A Review.阈下微脉冲激光治疗的设置与临床应用:综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 26;13(19):5729. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195729.
3
Optical coherence tomography angiography for microaneurysms in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treated diabetic macular edema.抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的微动脉瘤的光相干断层扫描血管造影。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03655-8.
4
Optimizing Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Subthreshold Micropulse Laser and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Combination Therapy.优化糖尿病性黄斑水肿治疗:阈下微脉冲激光与抗血管内皮生长因子联合治疗的Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 14;13(16):4782. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164782.
5
Efficacy of anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy with subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in the management of diabetic macular oedema (DMO): a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗血管内皮生长因子单药治疗与亚阈值微脉冲激光(SML)联合抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DMO)的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep;262(9):2733-2749. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06405-0. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
6
Subthreshold micropulse diode laser treatment in diabetic macular edema: biological impact, therapeutic effects, and safety.亚阈值微脉冲二极管激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:生物学影响、治疗效果和安全性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 3;44(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02973-6.
7
Comparison of micropulse subthreshold laser plus anti-VEGF versus anti-VEGF alone in diabetic macular edema: Systematic review.比较微脉冲亚阈值激光联合抗 VEGF 与单独抗 VEGF 在糖尿病性黄斑水肿中的疗效:系统评价。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;71(11):3448-3453. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_519_23.
8
Micropulse Laser Therapy as an Integral Part of Eye Disease Management.微脉冲激光治疗作为眼病管理的一个组成部分。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 28;59(8):1388. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081388.
9
The Role of Laser Photocoagulation in Treating Diabetic Macular Edema in the Era of Intravitreal Drug Administration: A Descriptive Review.激光光凝在眼内药物治疗时代治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的作用:描述性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 17;59(7):1319. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071319.
10
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review.阈下微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 29;12(1):274. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010274.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term safety, high-resolution imaging, and tissue temperature modeling of subvisible diode micropulse photocoagulation for retinovascular macular edema.用于治疗视网膜血管性黄斑水肿的亚可见二极管微脉冲光凝的长期安全性、高分辨率成像和组织温度建模。
Retina. 2012 Feb;32(2):375-86. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182206f6c.
2
Randomized clinical trial evaluating mETDRS versus normal or high-density micropulse photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema.一项评估 mETDRS 与常规或高密度微脉冲光凝治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的随机临床试验。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 17;52(7):4314-23. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6828.
3
Microperimetry and fundus autofluorescence in diabetic macular edema: subthreshold micropulse diode laser versus modified early treatment diabetic retinopathy study laser photocoagulation.微视野计和眼底自发荧光在糖尿病性黄斑水肿中的应用:阈下微脉冲二极管激光与改良早期治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变研究激光光凝比较。
Retina. 2010 Jun;30(6):908-16. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c96986.
4
Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-threshold micropulse diode laser photocoagulation and conventional green laser for clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.比较阈下微脉冲二极管激光光凝术与传统绿色激光治疗临床显著性糖尿病黄斑水肿的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;93(10):1341-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.146712. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
5
Serial optical coherence tomography of subthreshold diode laser micropulse photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema.阈下二极管激光微脉冲光凝治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的连续光学相干断层扫描
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2006 Sep-Oct;37(5):370-7. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20060901-03.
6
Subthreshold diode micropulse photocoagulation for the treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.阈下二极管微脉冲光凝术治疗具有临床意义的糖尿病性黄斑水肿
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;89(1):74-80. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.051540.
7
Subthreshold micropulse diode laser treatment in diabetic macular oedema.阈下微脉冲二极管激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep;88(9):1173-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.040949.
8
Decreasing retinal photocoagulation damage: principles and techniques.减少视网膜光凝损伤:原理与技术
Semin Ophthalmol. 1999 Dec;14(4):200-9. doi: 10.3109/08820539909069538.
9
Diode laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular oedema.二极管激光光凝治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿
Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Apr;79(4):318-21. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.4.318.
10
Demonstration of vasoproliferative activity from mammalian retina.哺乳动物视网膜血管增生活性的证明。
J Cell Biol. 1980 Feb;84(2):298-304. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.2.298.