Huang Jinhai, Liao Na, Savini Giacomo, Bao Fangjun, Yu Ye, Lu Weicong, Hu Qingjie, Wang Qinmei
School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China ; Key Laboratory of Vision Science, Ministry of Health, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China.
School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, 270 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325027, China.
J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:540760. doi: 10.1155/2014/540760. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
Purpose. To assess the consistency of anterior segment measurements obtained using a Sirius Scheimpflug/Placido photography-based topography system (CSO, Italy) and IOLMaster partial coherence interferometry (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Germany) in eyes with cataracts. Methods. A total of 90 eyes of 90 patients were included in this prospective study. The anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry (K), corneal astigmatism axis, and white to white (WTW) values were randomly measured three times with Sirius and IOLMaster. Concordance between them was assessed by calculating 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Results. The ACD and K taken with the Sirius were statistically significantly higher than that taken with the IOLMaster; however, the Sirius significantly underestimated the WTW values compared with the IOLMaster. Good agreement was found for Km and ACD measurements, with 95% LoA of -0.20 to 0.54 mm and -0.16 to 0.34 mm, respectively. Poor agreement was observed for astigmatism axis and WTW measurements, as the 95% LoA was -23.96 to 23.36° and -1.15 to 0.37 mm, respectively. Conclusion. With the exception of astigmatism axis and WTW, anterior segment measurements taken by Sirius and IOLMaster devices showed good agreement and may be used interchangeably in patients with cataracts.
目的。评估使用基于Sirius Scheimpflug/Placido摄影的地形图系统(意大利CSO公司)和IOLMaster部分相干干涉仪(德国卡尔蔡司医疗技术公司)在白内障患者眼中获得的眼前节测量值的一致性。方法。本前瞻性研究共纳入90例患者的90只眼。使用Sirius和IOLMaster对前房深度(ACD)、角膜曲率(K)、角膜散光轴和白对白(WTW)值进行随机测量3次。通过计算95%一致性界限(LoA)评估两者之间的一致性。结果。Sirius测量的ACD和K在统计学上显著高于IOLMaster测量的值;然而,与IOLMaster相比,Sirius显著低估了WTW值。对于Km和ACD测量,一致性良好,95%LoA分别为-0.20至0.54mm和-0.16至0.34mm。对于散光轴和WTW测量,一致性较差,95%LoA分别为-23.96至23.36°和-1.15至0.37mm。结论。除散光轴和WTW外,Sirius和IOLMaster设备测量的眼前节参数显示出良好的一致性,可在白内障患者中互换使用。