Suppr超能文献

使用两种Scheimpflug成像设备测量前房深度、白到白距离、前房角和瞳孔直径。

Measurements of anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter using two Scheimpflug imaging devices.

作者信息

Domínguez-Vicent Alberto, Monsálvez-Romín Daniel, Aguila-Carrasco Antonio Jesus Del, García-Lázaro Santiago, Montés-Micó Robert

机构信息

Optometry Research Group, Optics Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014 Aug;77(4):233-7. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140060.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the ocular anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter, as measured with two different Scheimpflug imaging devices.

METHODS

This transversal study included 80 right eyes from 80 subjects aged from 20 to 40 years. Their spherical equivalents ranged from -4.25 to +1.00 diopters (D). Each eye's anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter, were measured for far vision using both the Galilei G4 (double Scheimpflug camera) and the Pentacam HR (single Scheimpflug camera) systems.

RESULTS

Mean anterior chamber depths were calculated as 3.12 ± 0.23 mm and 3.19 ± 0.24 mm when measured with the Galilei G4 and the Pentacam HR, respectively. The mean white-to-white distance measured was 11.84 ± 0.31 mm and 11.90 ± 0.43 mm when measured with the Galilei G4 and the Pentacam HR, respectively. Mean pupil diameters were measured as 3.22 ± 0.58 mm and 3.22 ± 0.52 mm when measured with the Galilei G4 and the Pentacam HR, respectively. Finally, the mean anterior chamber angle was 34.30 ± 2.86 degrees when it was measured with the Galilei G4, and 39.26 ± 2.85 degrees when measured with the Pentacam HR. A comparative analysis revealed that the Galilei G4 yielded a significantly lower (P<0.05) measurement for the anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter, than the Pentacam HR system. Comparable values (P>0.05) for both devices were obtained for the white-to-white distance measurements.

CONCLUSION

The Galilei G4 and Pentacam HR Scheimpflug systems cannot be used interchangeably because they produce significant measurement differences.

摘要

目的

比较使用两种不同的Scheimpflug成像设备测量的眼前房深度、白对白距离、前房角和瞳孔直径。

方法

这项横断面研究纳入了80名年龄在20至40岁之间受试者的80只右眼。他们的等效球镜度数范围为-4.25至+1.00屈光度(D)。使用Galilei G4(双Scheimpflug相机)和Pentacam HR(单Scheimpflug相机)系统测量每只眼睛在远视力时的前房深度、白对白距离、前房角和瞳孔直径。

结果

使用Galilei G4和Pentacam HR测量时,平均前房深度分别计算为3.12±0.23mm和3.19±0.24mm。使用Galilei G4和Pentacam HR测量时,测得的平均白对白距离分别为11.84±0.31mm和11.90±0.43mm。使用Galilei G4和Pentacam HR测量时,平均瞳孔直径分别为3.22±0.58mm和3.22±0.52mm。最后,使用Galilei G4测量时平均前房角为34.30±2.86度,使用Pentacam HR测量时为39.26±2.85度。比较分析显示,与Pentacam HR系统相比,Galilei G4在前房深度、前房角和瞳孔直径的测量结果显著更低(P<0.05)。两种设备在白对白距离测量方面获得了可比的值(P>0.05)。

结论

Galilei G4和Pentacam HR Scheimpflug系统不能互换使用,因为它们产生显著的测量差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验