• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种Scheimpflug眼前节分析仪的比较。

Comparison between Two Scheimpflug Anterior Segment Analyzers.

作者信息

Baradaran-Rafii Alireza, Motevasseli Tahmineh, Yazdizadeh Forouzan, Karimian Farid, Fekri Sahba, Baradaran-Rafii Amir

机构信息

Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;12(1):23-29. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_104_16.

DOI:10.4103/jovr.jovr_104_16
PMID:28299003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5340059/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the anterior segment indices measured by two Scheimpflug camera machines; Galilei and Pentacam.

METHODS

In this observational case series, the anterior segment indices of myopic healthy subjects seeking for refractive surgery were measured by Pentacam and Galilei on the same day. Analyzed parameters were anterior and posterior best fit spheres (BFS), axial curvature, true corneal power, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber (AC) depth, AC volume, AC angle, and pupil diameter.

RESULTS

This study included 176 eyes of 88 participants. Mean radius of the anterior BFS was 7.79 ± 0.34 mm versus 7.75 ± 0.39 mm measured by Pentacam and Galilei, respectively ( = 0.877, < 0.001). Corresponding values for the mean radius of posterior BFS were 6.42 ± 0.32 and 6.47 ± 0.38 mm, respectively ( = 0.879, < 0.001). Anterior corneal mean power was 43.8 ± 1.9 diopters (D) with Pentacam and 43.8 ± 2.4 D with Galilei ( = 0.905,P < 0.001). Posterior corneal mean power was measured - 6.3 ± 0.3 and - 6.3 ± 0.4 D using Pentacam and Galilei, respectively ( = 0.873, < 0.001). True corneal power was 43.9 ± 1.9 D with Pentacam and 43.5 ± 2.3 D with Galilei ( = 0.909, < 0.001). CCT was 537 ± 44 and 553 ± 51 μm measured by Pentacam and Galilei, respectively ( = 0.796, < 0.001). AC depth measurements using Pentacam and Galilei were 3.29 ± 0.4 and 3.3 ± 0.38 mm ( < 0.001), respectively; AC volume was 207 ± 50 and 129 ± 39 mm≥ ( = 0.004), and AC angle was 39.7 ± 9.2 and 54.2 ± 5.2 degrees ( = 0.051), respectively. Average pupil diameter was measured 3.91 ± 1.77 mm by Pentacam and 3.34 ± 0.89 mm by Galilei ( = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant correlation between the Pentacam and Galilei in all measured parameters except AC angle, AC volume, and average pupil diameter.

摘要

目的

比较两款眼前节分析系统(Galilei和Pentacam)测量的眼前节参数。

方法

在这个观察性病例系列研究中,同一天使用Pentacam和Galilei对寻求屈光手术的近视健康受试者的眼前节参数进行测量。分析的参数包括前后最佳拟合球面(BFS)、轴向曲率、真实角膜屈光力、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房(AC)深度、AC容积、AC角和瞳孔直径。

结果

本研究纳入了88名参与者的176只眼。Pentacam测量的前BFS平均半径为7.79±0.34mm,Galilei测量的为7.75±0.39mm(t = 0.877,P < 0.001)。后BFS平均半径的相应值分别为6.42±0.32mm和6.47±0.38mm(t = 0.879,P < 0.001)。Pentacam测量的角膜前表面平均屈光力为43.8±1.9屈光度(D),Galilei测量的为43.8±2.4D(t = 0.905,P < 0.001)。Pentacam和Galilei测量的角膜后表面平均屈光力分别为-6.3±0.3D和-6.3±0.4D(t = 0.873,P < 0.001)。Pentacam测量的真实角膜屈光力为43.9±1.9D,Galilei测量的为43.5±2.3D(t = 0.909,P < 0.001)。Pentacam和Galilei测量的CCT分别为537±44μm和553±51μm(t = 0.796,P < 0.001)。Pentacam和Galilei测量的AC深度分别为3.29±0.4mm和3.3±0.38mm(P < 0.001);AC容积分别为207±50mm³和129±39mm³(t = 0.004),AC角分别为39.7±9.2度和54.2±5.2度(t = 0.051)。Pentacam测量的平均瞳孔直径为3.91±1.77mm,Galilei测量的为3.34±0.89mm(t = 0.018)。

结论

除AC角、AC容积和平均瞳孔直径外,Pentacam和Galilei在所有测量参数上均存在显著相关性。

相似文献

1
Comparison between Two Scheimpflug Anterior Segment Analyzers.两种Scheimpflug眼前节分析仪的比较。
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;12(1):23-29. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_104_16.
2
Measurements of anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter using two Scheimpflug imaging devices.使用两种Scheimpflug成像设备测量前房深度、白到白距离、前房角和瞳孔直径。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014 Aug;77(4):233-7. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140060.
3
Agreement of post-LASIK corneal power and corneal thickness measurements by pentacam and GALILEI corneal tomography systems.准分子激光角膜切削术后 pentacam 和 GALILEI 角膜地形图仪测量角膜后表面屈光力和角膜厚度的一致性。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2019 Jan;82(1):72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.07.005.
4
Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.使用 Galilei、HR Pentacam 和超声测量角膜厚度的比较。
Cornea. 2010 Oct;29(10):1091-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cf98e5.
5
Comparison of central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and simulated keratometry using galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius devices.使用 Galilei、Pentacam 和 Sirius 设备比较中央角膜厚度、最薄角膜厚度、前房深度和模拟角膜曲率。
Cornea. 2014 Jun;33(6):582-6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000119.
6
Assessment of anterior and posterior corneal indices using two Scheimpflug analyzers.使用两台眼前节分析系统评估角膜前后表面指数
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014 Jan-Feb;77(1):17-20. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140006.
7
Repeatability and agreement of three Scheimpflug-based imaging systems for measuring anterior segment parameters in keratoconus.基于 Scheimpflug 技术的三种眼前节成像系统测量圆锥角膜眼前节参数的重复性和一致性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jul 29;55(8):5263-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15055.
8
Comparison of Anterior Segment Parameters and Axial Length Using Two Scheimpflug Devices with Integrated Optical Biometers.使用两种集成光学生物测量仪的眼前节参数与眼轴长度的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 23;14:3487-3494. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S278701. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparison of corneal measurements using two different Scheimpflug analyzers in Sirius and Pentacam devices.两种不同的 Sirius 和 Pentacam 眼前节分析仪的角膜测量值比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 7;13(1):16956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44133-3.
10
Galilei Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part II.用于屈光手术候选者筛查的伽利略角膜地形图:文献综述,第二部分
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019 Fall;8(3):204-218.

引用本文的文献

1
A prospective comparison of Scheimpflug-based anterior segment imaging systems in normal and abnormal corneas: Oculus Pentacam vs. Remidio Visionix VX650.基于Scheimpflug原理的眼前节成像系统在正常和异常角膜中的前瞻性比较:Oculus Pentacam与Remidio Visionix VX650对比
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 19;5:1516423. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2025.1516423. eCollection 2025.
2
A comparison of Scansys and Sirius tomography in healthy eyes.Scansys 和 Sirius 断层扫描在健康眼中的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03389-7.
3
Optimization of biometry for best refractive outcome in cataract surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Anterior chamber depth measurements using Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography: repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement.使用Scheimpflug成像和光学相干断层扫描测量前房深度:可重复性、再现性和一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jan;41(1):178-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.038. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
2
Measurements of anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, anterior chamber angle, and pupil diameter using two Scheimpflug imaging devices.使用两种Scheimpflug成像设备测量前房深度、白到白距离、前房角和瞳孔直径。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014 Aug;77(4):233-7. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140060.
3
白内障手术中生物测量的优化以达到最佳屈光效果。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 1;72(1):29-43. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1219_23. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
4
On the Relationship between Corneal Biomechanics, Macrostructure, and Optical Properties.角膜生物力学、宏观结构与光学特性之间的关系
J Imaging. 2021 Dec 18;7(12):280. doi: 10.3390/jimaging7120280.
5
Comparison of Simulated and True Keratometry Measurements Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Dual Scheimpflug-Placido Imaging.使用扫频光学相干断层扫描和双施密夫鲁格-普拉西多成像技术对模拟角膜曲率测量值与真实角膜曲率测量值的比较
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 16;2021:5860846. doi: 10.1155/2021/5860846. eCollection 2021.
6
Corneal thickness evaluation in healthy eyes: Comparison between two different Scheimpflug devices.健康眼的角膜厚度评估:两种不同的 Scheimpflug 设备的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243370. eCollection 2020.
7
Galilei Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part II.用于屈光手术候选者筛查的伽利略角膜地形图:文献综述,第二部分
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019 Fall;8(3):204-218.
8
Optimizing outcomes with toric intraocular lenses.使用散光人工晶状体优化治疗效果。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;65(12):1301-1313. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_810_17.
Comparison of central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and simulated keratometry using galilei, Pentacam, and Sirius devices.
使用 Galilei、Pentacam 和 Sirius 设备比较中央角膜厚度、最薄角膜厚度、前房深度和模拟角膜曲率。
Cornea. 2014 Jun;33(6):582-6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000119.
4
A Comparison between Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness.Scheimpflug 成像与光学相干断层扫描测量角膜厚度的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Oct;120(10):1951-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.022. Epub 2013 May 11.
5
Dual versus single Scheimpflug camera for anterior segment analysis: Precision and agreement.双眼与单眼 Scheimpflug 相机在前节分析中的比较:精确性和一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;38(11):1934-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.06.049. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
6
Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and ultrasound.使用 Galilei、HR Pentacam 和超声测量角膜厚度的比较。
Cornea. 2010 Oct;29(10):1091-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cf98e5.
7
Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using Galilei, HR Pentacam, and Orbscan II.使用Galilei、HR Pentacam和Orbscan II测量前房深度的比较。
Optometry. 2010 Jan;81(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.optm.2009.04.100.
8
Comparison of anterior and posterior elevation map measurements between 2 Scheimpflug imaging systems.两种Scheimpflug成像系统之间前、后高度图测量的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 May;35(5):856-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.008.
9
Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement.旋转式Scheimpflug摄影术和扫描裂隙角膜地形图仪用于角膜屈光力测量的重复性、再现性及一致性特征
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.019.
10
Repeatability of corneal first-surface wavefront aberrations measured with Pentacam corneal topography.使用Pentacam角膜地形图测量的角膜前表面波前像差的可重复性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 May;34(5):727-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.056.