Department of Psychology, Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California, Berkeley, 4152 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720-1650, USA,
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Jan;17(1):531. doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0531-3.
Many psychiatric disorders involve problematic patterns of emotional reactivity and regulation. In this review, we consider recent findings regarding emotion and emotion regulation in the context of social anxiety disorder (SAD). We first describe key features of SAD which suggest altered emotional and self-related processing difficulties. Next, we lay the conceptual foundation for a discussion of emotion and emotion regulation and present a common framework for understanding emotion regulation, the process model of emotion regulation. Using the process model, we evaluate the recent empirical literature spanning self-report, observational, behavioral, and physiological methods across five specific families of emotion regulation processes-situation selection, situation modification, attentional deployment, cognitive change, and response modulation. Next, we examine the empirical evidence behind two psychosocial interventions for SAD: cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Throughout, we present suggestions for future directions in the continued examination of emotion and emotion regulation in SAD.
许多精神障碍都涉及情绪反应和调节的问题模式。在这篇综述中，我们将考虑社交焦虑障碍（SAD）背景下的情绪和情绪调节的最新发现。我们首先描述了 SAD 的关键特征，这些特征表明存在改变的情绪和自我相关处理困难。接下来，我们为讨论情绪和情绪调节奠定了概念基础，并提出了一个理解情绪调节的通用框架，即情绪调节的过程模型。使用过程模型，我们评估了跨越五个特定的情绪调节过程类别（情境选择、情境修改、注意力部署、认知改变和反应调节）的自我报告、观察、行为和生理方法的最新实证文献。接下来，我们检查了两种针对 SAD 的心理社会干预措施的实证证据：认知行为疗法（CBT）和正念减压疗法（MBSR）。在整个过程中，我们为进一步研究 SAD 中的情绪和情绪调节提出了未来的方向。
