Kirkland Tracy, Kemp Robert S, Hunter Lori M, Twine Wayne S
University of Colorado Boulder.
University of the Witwatersrand.
Food Cult Soc. 2013 Mar;16(1):65-84. doi: 10.2752/175174413X13500468045407.
Accurate measurement of household food security is essential to generate adequate information on the proportion of households experiencing food insecurity, especially in areas or regions vulnerable to food shortages and famine. This manuscript offers a methodological examination of three commonly used indicators of household food security - experience of hunger, dietary diversity, and coping strategies. Making use of data from the Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance Site in rural South Africa, we examine the association between the indicators themselves to improve understanding of the different insight offered by each food security "lens." We also examine how the choice of indicator shapes the profile of vulnerable households, with results suggesting that dietary diversity scores may not adequately capture broader food insecurity. Concluding discussion explores programmatic and policy implications as related to methodological choices.
准确衡量家庭粮食安全对于获取有关面临粮食不安全状况家庭比例的充分信息至关重要,尤其是在易受粮食短缺和饥荒影响的地区。本论文对家庭粮食安全的三个常用指标——饥饿经历、饮食多样性和应对策略进行了方法学审视。利用南非农村阿金库尔健康与人口监测点的数据,我们研究了这些指标之间的关联,以增进对每个粮食安全“视角”所提供不同见解的理解。我们还研究了指标的选择如何塑造脆弱家庭的概况,结果表明饮食多样性得分可能无法充分反映更广泛的粮食不安全状况。结论性讨论探讨了与方法选择相关的方案和政策影响。