Suppr超能文献

科学研究资助机构支持哪些科学传播理念?

What conceptions of science communication are espoused by science research funding bodies?

作者信息

Palmer Sarah E, Schibeci Renato A

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jul;23(5):511-27. doi: 10.1177/0963662512455295.

Abstract

We examine the conceptions of science communication, especially in relation to "public engagement with science" (PES), evident in the literature and websites of science research funding bodies in Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Oceania, and Africa. The analysis uses a fourfold classification of science communication to situate these conceptions: professional, deficit, consultative and deliberative. We find that all bodies engage in professional communication (within the research community); however, engagement with the broader community is variable. Deficit (information dissemination) models still prevail but there is evidence of movement towards more deliberative, participatory models.

摘要

我们审视了科学传播的概念,尤其是与“公众参与科学”(PES)相关的概念,这些概念在欧洲、北美、南美、亚洲、大洋洲和非洲的科学研究资助机构的文献和网站中很明显。该分析采用了科学传播的四重分类来定位这些概念:专业型、缺陷型、咨询型和审议型。我们发现,所有机构都参与专业传播(在研究社区内部);然而,与更广泛社区的互动情况各不相同。缺陷型(信息传播)模式仍然占主导地位,但有证据表明正朝着更具审议性、参与性的模式转变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验