Suppr超能文献

治疗师指导的互联网认知行为疗法对儿童强迫症的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的结果

Cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: results from a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Lenhard Fabian, Ssegonja Richard, Andersson Erik, Feldman Inna, Rück Christian, Mataix-Cols David, Serlachius Eva

机构信息

Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Stockholm Healthcare Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 May 17;7(5):e015246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015246.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) intervention for adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) compared with untreated patients on a waitlist.

DESIGN

Single-blinded randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

A research clinic within the regular child and adolescent mental health service in Stockholm, Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-seven adolescents (12-17 years) with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition diagnosis of OCD.

INTERVENTIONS

Either a 12-week, therapist-guided ICBT intervention or a wait list condition of equal duration.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost data were collected at baseline and after treatment, including healthcare use, supportive resources, prescription drugs, prescription-free drugs, school absence and productivity loss, as well as the cost of ICBT. Health outcomes were defined as treatment responder rate and quality-adjusted life years gain. Bootstrapped mixed model analyses were conducted comparing incremental costs and health outcomes between the groups from the societal and healthcare perspectives.

RESULTS

Compared with waitlist control, ICBT generated substantial societal cost savings averaging US$-144.98 (95% CI -159.79 to -130.16) per patient. The cost reductions were mainly driven by reduced healthcare use in the ICBT group. From the societal perspective, the probability of ICBT being cost saving compared with waitlist control was approximately 60%. From the healthcare perspective, the cost per additional responder to ICBT compared with waitlist control was approximately US$78.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that therapist-guided ICBT is a cost-effective treatment and results in societal cost savings, compared with patients who do not receive evidence-based treatment. Since, at present, most patients with OCD do not have access to evidence-based treatments, the results have important implications for the increasingly strained national and healthcare budgets. Future studies should compare the cost-effectiveness of ICBT with regular face-to-face CBT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02191631.

摘要

目的

评估由治疗师指导的、通过互联网提供的认知行为疗法(ICBT)干预措施对患有强迫症(OCD)的青少年的成本效益,与等候名单上未接受治疗的患者进行比较。

设计

单盲随机对照试验。

地点

瑞典斯德哥尔摩常规儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构内的一家研究诊所。

参与者

67名年龄在12至17岁之间、根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版诊断为强迫症的青少年。

干预措施

为期12周的、由治疗师指导的ICBT干预措施,或同等时长的等候名单状态。

主要结局指标

在基线和治疗后收集成本数据,包括医疗保健使用情况、支持性资源、处方药、非处方药、缺课情况和生产力损失,以及ICBT的成本。健康结局定义为治疗反应率和质量调整生命年增益。从社会和医疗保健角度,进行自抽样混合模型分析,比较两组之间的增量成本和健康结局。

结果

与等候名单对照组相比,ICBT为每位患者平均节省了可观的社会成本,达144.98美元(95%置信区间为-159.79至-130.16)。成本降低主要是由ICBT组医疗保健使用的减少所驱动。从社会角度来看,与等候名单对照组相比,ICBT具有成本效益的概率约为60%。从医疗保健角度来看,与等候名单对照组相比,ICBT每增加一名反应者的成本约为78美元。

结论

结果表明,与未接受循证治疗的患者相比,由治疗师指导的ICBT是一种具有成本效益的治疗方法,并能节省社会成本。由于目前大多数强迫症患者无法获得循证治疗,这些结果对日益紧张的国家和医疗保健预算具有重要意义。未来的研究应比较ICBT与常规面对面认知行为疗法(CBT)的成本效益。

试验注册号

NCT02191631。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c913/5729979/b213b83bcd9a/bmjopen-2016-015246f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验