Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像中金属正畸矫治器引起的磁化率伪影的可预测性

Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging.

作者信息

Blankenstein F, Truong B T, Thomas A, Thieme N, Zachriat C

机构信息

Centrum für Zahn- Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Abteilung für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Alterszahnmedizin und Funktionslehre, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197, Berlin, Deutschland,

出版信息

J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Jan;76(1):14-29. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0258-0. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Orthodontic appliances are often prophylactically removed prior to MRI examinations, although they are sometimes left in situ (out of ignorance). Either way, there is a risk of adverse consequences for the patient, as removing the appliance may incur avoidable costs and extensive dental treatment, whereas leaving them in can cause artifacts that can significantly impair the diagnostic quality of MRI. The aim of this study was to measure the size of experimental artifacts created by orthodontic devices and to develop criteria using sound material-science research for making MRI more compatible, thereby supporting radiologists and orthodontists in their efforts.

METHODS

Sixteen orthodontic small-device and wire specimens made of different steel and titanium or CoCr alloys were placed in a chambered water-filled phantom for MRI. Each was subjected to spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

RESULTS

We observed that artifact formation depends on the material properties (specimen size, crystalline structure, manufacture-related processing) and on the specifications of the MRI system used (main field strength, sequence type). Our results varied considerably according to the steel grades. Artifact radii ranged from 14 mm (spin echo at 1.5 Tesla) to 51 mm (gradient echo at 3 Tesla). No artifacts occurred at 1.5 Tesla around the titanium and CoCr specimens; the same observation was made with one of the steel grades.

CONCLUSION

Artifact size cannot be predicted merely from the designation "steel". Nor did the crystalline structure of the baseline material from which a steel device had been produced have major implications for artifact size. Relevant, however, was the magnetic permeability (or susceptibility) of the final products, which is not disclosed by the manufacturers, and it cannot be measured on fixed intraoral appliances. Furthermore, the present investigation reveals that some steel devices can remain in situ without triggering adverse consequences.

摘要

目的

正畸矫治器在磁共振成像(MRI)检查前通常会预防性拆除,不过有时也会因疏忽而留在原位。无论哪种情况,对患者都存在不良后果的风险,因为拆除矫治器可能会产生不必要的费用和进行广泛的牙科治疗,而将其留在原位则可能导致伪影,从而严重影响MRI的诊断质量。本研究的目的是测量正畸装置产生的实验性伪影的大小,并利用可靠的材料科学研究制定标准,以使MRI兼容性更强,从而为放射科医生和正畸医生的工作提供支持。

方法

将16个由不同钢材、钛或钴铬合金制成的正畸小型装置和金属丝样本置于一个带腔的充水模型中进行MRI检查。每个样本在1.5和3特斯拉的磁场强度下分别接受自旋回波和梯度回波序列扫描。

结果

我们观察到伪影的形成取决于材料特性(样本尺寸、晶体结构、与制造相关的加工工艺)以及所使用的MRI系统的参数(主磁场强度、序列类型)。根据钢材等级的不同,我们的结果差异很大。伪影半径范围从14毫米(1.5特斯拉自旋回波)到51毫米(3特斯拉梯度回波)。在1.5特斯拉磁场下,钛和钴铬样本周围未出现伪影;其中一种钢材等级的样本也有同样的情况。

结论

不能仅仅根据“钢材”这一名称来预测伪影大小。制造钢材装置的基础材料的晶体结构对伪影大小也没有重大影响。然而,最终产品的磁导率(或磁化率)才是相关因素,而制造商并未披露这一信息,并且无法在固定的口腔内矫治器上进行测量。此外,本研究表明一些钢材装置可以留在原位而不会引发不良后果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验