• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估胸腔镜滑石粉喷洒与滑石粉悬液胸膜固定术的疗效(TAPPS试验):一项开放标签随机对照试验方案

Evaluating the efficacy of thoracoscopy and talc poudrage versus pleurodesis using talc slurry (TAPPS trial): protocol of an open-label randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Bhatnagar Rahul, Laskawiec-Szkonter Magda, Piotrowska Hania E G, Kahan Brennan C, Hooper Clare E, Davies Helen E, Harvey John E, Miller Robert F, Rahman Najib M, Maskell Nick A

机构信息

Respiratory Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 26;4(11):e007045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007045.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007045
PMID:25428632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4248086/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The management of recurrent malignant pleural effusions (MPE) can be challenging. Various options are available, with the most efficacious and widely used being talc pleurodesis. Talc can either be applied via a chest drain in the form of slurry, or at medical thoracoscopy using poudrage. Current evidence regarding which method is most effective is conflicting and often methodologically flawed. The TAPPS trial is a suitably powered, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial designed to compare the pleurodesis success rate of medical thoracoscopy and talc poudrage with chest drain insertion and talc slurry.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

330 patients with a confirmed MPE requiring intervention will be recruited from UK hospitals. Patients will be randomised (1:1) to undergo either small bore (<14 Fr) Seldinger chest drain insertion followed by instillation of sterile talc (4 g), or to undergo medical thoracoscopy and simultaneous poudrage (4 g). The allocated procedure will be performed as an inpatient within 3 days of randomisation taking place. Following discharge, patients will be followed up at regular intervals for 6 months. The primary outcome measure is pleurodesis failure rates at 3 months. Pleurodesis failure is defined as the need for further pleural intervention for fluid management on the side of the trial intervention.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has received ethical approval from the National Research Ethics Service Committee North West-Preston (12/NW/0467). There is a trial steering committee which includes independent members and a patient and public representative. The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences, as well as being disseminated via local and national charities and patient groups. All participants who wish to know the study results will also be contacted directly on their publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN47845793.

摘要

引言

复发性恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的管理具有挑战性。有多种选择,其中最有效且应用最广泛的是滑石粉胸膜固定术。滑石粉既可以通过胸腔引流管以悬液的形式应用,也可以在内科胸腔镜检查时采用撒粉法应用。关于哪种方法最有效,目前的证据相互矛盾,而且在方法学上往往存在缺陷。TAPPS试验是一项样本量充足的多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验,旨在比较内科胸腔镜检查及滑石粉撒粉法与胸腔引流管置入及滑石粉悬液法的胸膜固定成功率。

方法与分析

将从英国医院招募330例确诊需要干预的MPE患者。患者将被随机分组(1:1),分别接受细口径(<14 Fr)Seldinger胸腔引流管置入,随后注入无菌滑石粉(4 g),或接受内科胸腔镜检查并同时撒粉(4 g)。分配的操作将在随机分组后的3天内作为住院治疗进行。出院后将对患者进行定期随访,为期6个月。主要结局指标是3个月时的胸膜固定失败率。胸膜固定失败定义为在试验干预侧需要进一步进行胸膜干预以处理胸腔积液。

伦理与传播

该试验已获得西北普雷斯顿国家研究伦理服务委员会的伦理批准(12/NW/0467)。设有试验指导委员会,其中包括独立成员以及患者和公众代表。试验结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并在国际会议上公布,同时还将通过地方和国家慈善机构以及患者团体进行传播。所有希望了解研究结果的参与者在结果发表时也将直接收到通知。

试验注册号

ISRCTN47845793。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the efficacy of thoracoscopy and talc poudrage versus pleurodesis using talc slurry (TAPPS trial): protocol of an open-label randomised controlled trial.评估胸腔镜滑石粉喷洒与滑石粉悬液胸膜固定术的疗效(TAPPS试验):一项开放标签随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 26;4(11):e007045. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007045.
2
Thoracoscopy and talc poudrage compared with intercostal drainage and talc slurry infusion to manage malignant pleural effusion: the TAPPS RCT.胸腔镜和滑石粉喷洒与肋间引流和滑石粉混悬液灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液的比较:TAPPS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(26):1-90. doi: 10.3310/hta24260.
3
Effect of Thoracoscopic Talc Poudrage vs Talc Slurry via Chest Tube on Pleurodesis Failure Rate Among Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.胸腔镜滑石粉喷洒与经胸管注入滑石粉悬液对恶性胸腔积液患者胸膜固定术失败率的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2020 Jan 7;323(1):60-69. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.19997.
4
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
5
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 8;2016(5):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub2.
6
OPTIMUM: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Out Patient Talc slurry via Indwelling pleural catheter for Malignant pleural effusion vs Usual inpatient Management.OPTIMUM:一项多中心随机对照试验方案,比较经留置胸膜导管的门诊滑石粉悬液治疗恶性胸腔积液与常规住院治疗。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 18;6(10):e012795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012795.
7
Efficacy of sonographic and biological pleurodesis indicators of malignant pleural effusion (SIMPLE): protocol of a randomised controlled trial.恶性胸腔积液的超声与生物性胸膜固定术指标的疗效(SIMPLE):一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017 Nov 20;4(1):e000225. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000225. eCollection 2017.
8
The randomised thoracoscopic talc poudrage+indwelling pleural catheters versus thoracoscopic talc poudrage only in malignant pleural effusion trial (TACTIC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.随机胸腔镜滑石粉泼洒+留置胸腔引流管与单纯胸腔镜滑石粉泼洒治疗恶性胸腔积液的试验(TACTIC):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 May;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001682.
9
Australasian Malignant PLeural Effusion (AMPLE)-3 trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter (±talc pleurodesis) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for management of malignant pleural effusion.澳大利亚恶性胸腔积液(AMPLE)-3 试验:一项多中心随机研究的研究方案,比较留置胸腔导管(±滑石粉胸膜固定术)与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗恶性胸腔积液。
Trials. 2022 Jun 27;23(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06405-7.
10
Talc poudrage versus talc slurry in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. A prospective comparative study.滑石粉喷洒术与滑石粉浆治疗恶性胸腔积液的前瞻性对照研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Dec;30(6):827-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.10.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Talc slurry versus thoracoscopic talc insufflation for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.滑石粉混悬液与胸腔镜滑石粉灌洗治疗恶性胸腔积液的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Bras Pneumol. 2024 Aug 19;50(3):e20240115. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20240115. eCollection 2024.
2
Image-Guided Breast Interventions: Biopsy and Beyond.影像引导下的乳腺介入:活检及其他。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021 Apr;31(2):391-399. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1734223. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
3
Thoracoscopy and talc poudrage compared with intercostal drainage and talc slurry infusion to manage malignant pleural effusion: the TAPPS RCT.

本文引用的文献

1
The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies.在随机试验中协变量调整的风险和收益:来自 8 项研究的 12 个结局评估。
Trials. 2014 Apr 23;15:139. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-139.
2
Assessing potential sources of clustering in individually randomised trials.评估个体随机试验中聚集现象的潜在来源。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Apr 16;13:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-58.
3
Reporting and analysis of trials using stratified randomisation in leading medical journals: review and reanalysis.
胸腔镜和滑石粉喷洒与肋间引流和滑石粉混悬液灌注治疗恶性胸腔积液的比较:TAPPS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(26):1-90. doi: 10.3310/hta24260.
4
Effect of chest tube size on pleurodesis efficacy in malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.胸管尺寸对恶性胸腔积液胸膜固定术疗效的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(1):355-362. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.134.
5
Diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions: state of the art in 2017.恶性胸腔积液的诊断与管理:2017年的最新进展
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Sep;9(Suppl 10):S1111-S1122. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.07.79.
6
Medical thoracoscopy and its evolving role in the diagnosis and treatment of pleural disease.医学胸腔镜检查及其在胸膜疾病诊断和治疗中不断演变的作用。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Sep;9(Suppl 10):S1011-S1021. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.37.
7
Video assisted thoracoscopic and open chest surgery in diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural diseases.电视辅助胸腔镜及开胸手术在恶性胸膜疾病诊断与治疗中的应用
J Vis Surg. 2017 Jun 22;3:85. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.05.05. eCollection 2017.
8
Chest Drain Size: the Debate Continues.胸腔引流管尺寸:争论仍在继续。
Curr Pulmonol Rep. 2017;6(1):26-29. doi: 10.1007/s13665-017-0162-3. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
9
Advanced medical interventions in pleural disease.胸膜疾病的先进医疗干预措施。
Eur Respir Rev. 2016 Jun;25(140):199-213. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0020-2016.
10
Malignant pleural effusion: from bench to bedside.恶性胸腔积液:从实验台到病床边
Eur Respir Rev. 2016 Jun;25(140):189-98. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0019-2016.
主要医学期刊中分层随机化试验的报告和分析:综述与再分析。
BMJ. 2012 Sep 14;345:e5840. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5840.
4
Improper analysis of trials randomised using stratified blocks or minimisation.分层块或最小化随机试验的不当分析。
Stat Med. 2012 Feb 20;31(4):328-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4431. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
5
Local anaesthetic thoracoscopy: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010.局部麻醉胸腔镜检查:英国胸科学会胸膜疾病指南2010版
Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii54-60. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.137018.
6
Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010.恶性胸腔积液的管理:英国胸科学会胸膜疾病指南2010
Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii32-40. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136994.
7
Phase III intergroup study of talc poudrage vs talc slurry sclerosis for malignant pleural effusion.滑石粉喷洒与滑石粉浆硬化治疗恶性胸腔积液的III期组间研究。
Chest. 2005 Mar;127(3):909-15. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.3.909.
8
Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions.恶性胸腔积液的胸膜固定术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002916.pub2.
9
The incidence of pleural effusion in a well-defined region. Epidemiologic study in central Bohemia.特定区域胸腔积液的发病率。波希米亚中部的流行病学研究。
Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1486-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.104.5.1486.