Sideridis Georgios, Simos Panagiotis, Papanicolaou Andrew, Fletcher Jack
Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
University of Crete, Herakleion, Greece.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2014 Oct;74(5):733-758. doi: 10.1177/0013164414525397.
The present study assessed the impact of sample size on the power and fit of structural equation modeling applied to functional brain connectivity hypotheses. The data consisted of time-constrained minimum norm estimates of regional brain activity during performance of a reading task obtained with magnetoencephalography. Power analysis was first conducted for an autoregressive model with 5 latent variables (brain regions), each defined by 3 indicators (successive activity time bins). A series of simulations were then run by generating data from an existing pool of 51 typical readers (aged 7.5-12.5 years). Sample sizes ranged between 20 and 1,000 participants and for each sample size 1,000 replications were run. Results were evaluated using chi-square Type I errors, model convergence, mean RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) values, confidence intervals of the RMSEA, structural path stability, and D-Fit index values. Results suggested that 70 to 80 participants were adequate to model relationships reflecting close to not so close fit as per MacCallum et al.'s recommendations. Sample sizes of 50 participants were associated with satisfactory fit. It is concluded that structural equation modeling is a viable methodology to model complex regional interdependencies in brain activation in pediatric populations.
本研究评估了样本量对应用于功能性脑连接假设的结构方程模型的效能和拟合度的影响。数据包括在阅读任务执行期间通过脑磁图获得的区域脑活动的时间受限最小范数估计值。首先对一个具有5个潜在变量(脑区)的自回归模型进行效能分析,每个潜在变量由3个指标(连续活动时间区间)定义。然后通过从现有的51名典型读者(年龄在7.5至12.5岁之间)的数据池中生成数据来运行一系列模拟。样本量在20至1000名参与者之间,对于每个样本量运行1000次重复。使用卡方I型错误、模型收敛、平均RMSEA(近似均方根误差)值、RMSEA的置信区间、结构路径稳定性和D-Fit指数值来评估结果。结果表明,根据麦卡勒姆等人的建议,70至80名参与者足以对反映接近不太拟合的关系进行建模。50名参与者的样本量具有令人满意的拟合度。得出的结论是,结构方程模型是一种可行的方法,可用于对儿科人群脑激活中的复杂区域相互依存关系进行建模。