Gartrell Nanette K, Bos Henny, Goldberg Naomi G, Deck Amalia, van Rijn-van Gelderen Loes
Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law, Los Angeles, California; Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jan;103(1):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
To assess whether lesbian mothers of 17-year-old adolescents conceived through donor insemination are satisfied with their choice of a known, open-identity, or unknown sperm donor and whether the mothers' satisfaction is associated with psychological health problems in the index adolescent offspring.
Mixed-method study.
Not applicable.
PATIENT(S): One hundred twenty-nine lesbian mothers and 77 index offspring.
INTERVENTION(S): Semistructured interviews with the mothers conducted by telephone and the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI) completed online by the adolescent offspring.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Satisfaction with the type of sperm donor selected was assessed through multiple choice questions, and adolescent psychological health problems by the STPI. The reasons for the mothers' (dis)satisfaction were evaluated through a thematic analysis of transcribed interviews.
RESULT(S): Overall, 77.5% of mothers were satisfied with the type of donor chosen. There were no significant differences between birth mothers and comothers on (dis)satisfaction. In comparing satisfied with dissatisfied birth mothers by donor type, the only significant differences were that those selecting open-identity donors were more satisfied than dissatisfied and that those using unknown donors were more dissatisfied than satisfied; (dis)satisfaction with donor type was unrelated to offspring psychological health problems. Qualitative analyses revealed six themes concerning all mothers' reasons for (dis)satisfaction.
CONCLUSION(S): Donor access and custody concerns were the primary themes mentioned by lesbian mothers regarding their (dis)satisfaction with the type of sperm donor they had selected.
评估通过捐赠人工授精生育17岁青少年的女同性恋母亲是否对她们选择的已知、公开身份或未知精子捐赠者感到满意,以及母亲的满意度是否与索引青少年后代的心理健康问题相关。
混合方法研究。
不适用。
129名女同性恋母亲和77名索引后代。
通过电话对母亲进行半结构化访谈,并让青少年后代在线完成状态-特质人格量表(STPI)。
通过多项选择题评估对所选精子捐赠者类型的满意度,通过STPI评估青少年心理健康问题。通过对转录访谈的主题分析评估母亲(不)满意的原因。
总体而言,77.5%的母亲对所选捐赠者类型感到满意。生母和共同母亲在(不)满意方面没有显著差异。按捐赠者类型比较满意与不满意的生母时,唯一显著的差异是选择公开身份捐赠者的人比不满意的人更满意,而使用未知捐赠者的人比满意的人更不满意;对捐赠者类型的(不)满意与后代心理健康问题无关。定性分析揭示了关于所有母亲(不)满意原因的六个主题。
捐赠者获取和监护问题是女同性恋母亲提到的关于她们对所选精子捐赠者类型(不)满意的主要主题。