Jadva Vasanti, Freeman Tabitha, Tranfield Erika, Golombok Susan
a Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge , Cambridge , UK.
b Pride Angel, Whitfield Business Hub , Heswall , UK.
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2018 Jun;21(2):112-119. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1315460. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
Whilst studies have examined the experiences of women who use clinic donors, to date there has been limited research investigating women's motivations and experiences of searching for a sperm donor online. A total of 429 women looking for a sperm donor on Pride Angel (a website that facilitates contact between donors and recipients) completed an online survey. Fifty-eight percent (249) saw advantages of obtaining donated sperm online with the most common advantage reported as being able to connect with and meet the donor (n = 50 (24%)). A third (n = 157 (37%)) of the participants gave disadvantages, the most common reported was encountering 'dishonest donors' (n = 63 (40%)). Most recipients (n = 181 (61%)) wanted the donor to be 'just a donor' (i.e. to provide sperm and have no further contact). Whilst it was important for recipients to know the identity of the donor, some did not see this as important for the child and thus the level of information that parents have about the donor, and that which the child has, can differ. Finding a donor online blurs the distinction between categories of 'anonymous', 'known' and 'identity release' donations. Whilst the survey had a large sample size, the representativeness of the sample is not known.
虽然已有研究考察了使用诊所捐赠者的女性的经历,但迄今为止,对于女性在网上寻找精子捐赠者的动机和经历的调查还很有限。共有429名在“骄傲天使”(一个促进捐赠者与受赠者联系的网站)上寻找精子捐赠者的女性完成了一项在线调查。58%(249人)认为在网上获取捐赠精子有好处,最常见的好处是能够与捐赠者取得联系并见面(n = 50(24%))。三分之一(n = 157(37%))的参与者指出了弊端,最常见的是遇到“不诚实的捐赠者”(n = 63(40%))。大多数受赠者(n = 181(61%))希望捐赠者“只是一个捐赠者”(即提供精子且不再有进一步联系)。虽然对受赠者来说了解捐赠者的身份很重要,但一些人认为这对孩子并不重要,因此父母和孩子所掌握的关于捐赠者的信息水平可能会有所不同。在网上寻找捐赠者模糊了“匿名”“已知”和“身份公开”捐赠类别之间的区别。虽然该调查样本量很大,但样本的代表性未知。