Elison Jed T, Wolff Jason J, Reznick J Steven, Botteron Kelly N, Estes Annette M, Gu Hongbin, Hazlett Heather C, Meadows Adriane J, Paterson Sarah J, Zwaigenbaum Lonnie, Piven Joseph
Institute of Child Development at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities and the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, NC.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;53(11):1216-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
As compared to the utility of early emerging social communicative risk markers for predicting a later diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), less is known about the relevance of early patterns of restricted and repetitive behaviors. We examined patterns of stereotyped motor mannerisms and repetitive manipulation of objects in 12-month-olds at high and low risk for developing ASD, all of whom were assessed for ASD at 24 months.
Observational coding of repetitive object manipulation and stereotyped motor behaviors in digital recordings of the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales was conducted using the Repetitive and Stereotyped Movement Scales for 3 groups of 12-month-olds: low-risk infants (LR, n = 53); high-familial-risk infants who did not meet diagnostic criteria for ASD at 24 months (HR-negative, n = 75); and high-familial-risk infants who met diagnostic criteria for ASD at 24 months (HR-ASD, n = 30).
The HR-ASD group showed significantly more stereotyped motor mannerisms than both the HR-negative group (p = .025) and the LR group (p = .001). The HR-ASD and HR-negative groups demonstrated statistically equivalent repetitive object manipulation scores (p = .431), and both groups showed significantly more repetitive object manipulation than the LR group (p < .040). Combining the motor and object stereotypy scores into a Repetitive and Stereotyped Movement Scales (RSMS) composite yielded a disorder-continuum effect such that each group was significantly different from one another (LR < HR-negative < HR-ASD).
These results suggest that targeted assessment of repetitive behavior during infancy may augment early ASD identification efforts.
与早期出现的社交沟通风险标志物对预测自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)后期诊断的效用相比,人们对早期受限和重复行为模式的相关性了解较少。我们研究了12个月大的高风险和低风险ASD患儿的刻板运动习惯模式和物体重复操作情况,所有患儿在24个月时均接受了ASD评估。
使用重复和刻板运动量表对三组12个月大的婴儿在《沟通和象征行为量表》数字记录中的重复物体操作和刻板运动行为进行观察编码:低风险婴儿(LR,n = 53);24个月时未达到ASD诊断标准的高家族风险婴儿(HR阴性,n = 75);以及24个月时达到ASD诊断标准的高家族风险婴儿(HR-ASD,n = 30)。
HR-ASD组表现出的刻板运动习惯明显多于HR阴性组(p = .025)和LR组(p = .001)。HR-ASD组和HR阴性组的重复物体操作得分在统计学上相当(p = .431),且两组的重复物体操作均明显多于LR组(p < .040)。将运动和物体刻板印象得分合并为重复和刻板运动量表(RSMS)综合得分产生了一种障碍连续效应,使得每组之间存在显著差异(LR < HR阴性 < HR-ASD)。
这些结果表明,婴儿期对重复行为进行有针对性的评估可能会增强早期ASD识别工作。