Whitehead Phyllis B, Herbertson Robert K, Hamric Ann B, Epstein Elizabeth G, Fisher Joan M
Epsilon Psi and Tau Phi, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Palliative Care Service, Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital, and Assistant Professor, Virginia Tech Carilion, School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 Mar;47(2):117-25. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12115. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
Moral distress is a phenomenon affecting many professionals across healthcare settings. Few studies have used a standard measure of moral distress to assess and compare differences among professions and settings.
A descriptive, comparative design was used to study moral distress among all healthcare professionals and all settings at one large healthcare system in January 2011.
Data were gathered via a web-based survey of demographics, the Moral Distress Scale-Revised (MDS-R), and a shortened version of Olson's Hospital Ethical Climate Scale (HECS-S).
Five hundred ninety-two (592) clinicians completed usable surveys (22%). Moral distress was present in all professional groups. Nurses and other professionals involved in direct patient care had significantly higher moral distress than physicians (p = .001) and other indirect care professionals (p < .001). Moral distress was negatively correlated with ethical workplace climate (r = -0.516; p < .001). Watching patient care suffer due to lack of continuity and poor communication were the highest-ranked sources of moral distress for all professional groups, but the groups varied in other identified sources. Providers working in adult or intensive care unit (ICU) settings had higher levels of moral distress than did clinicians in pediatric or non-ICU settings (p < .001). Providers who left or considered leaving a position had significantly higher moral distress levels than those who never considered leaving (p < .001). Providers who had training in end-of-life care had higher average levels of moral distress than those without this training (p = .005).
Although there may be differences in perspectives and experiences, moral distress is a common experience for clinicians, regardless of profession.
Moral distress is associated with burnout and intention to leave a position. By understanding its root causes, interventions can be tailored to minimize moral distress with the ultimate goal of enhancing patient care, staff satisfaction, and retention.
道德困扰是一种影响众多医疗保健领域专业人员的现象。很少有研究使用道德困扰的标准测量方法来评估和比较不同职业和环境之间的差异。
2011年1月,采用描述性、比较性设计研究了一家大型医疗系统中所有医疗保健专业人员及其所在环境中的道德困扰情况。
通过基于网络的调查收集数据,内容包括人口统计学信息、修订后的道德困扰量表(MDS-R)以及奥尔森医院伦理氛围量表的简化版(HECS-S)。
592名临床医生完成了可用的调查问卷(回复率为22%)。所有专业群体都存在道德困扰。与患者直接接触的护士和其他专业人员的道德困扰程度显著高于医生(p = 0.001)和其他间接护理专业人员(p < 0.001)。道德困扰与道德的工作场所氛围呈负相关(r = -0.516;p < 0.001)。对于所有专业群体而言,因缺乏连续性和沟通不畅导致患者护理受影响是道德困扰的首要来源,但在其他已确定的来源方面,各群体存在差异。在成人或重症监护病房(ICU)工作的医护人员的道德困扰程度高于儿科或非ICU环境中的临床医生(p < 0.001)。离职或考虑离职的医护人员的道德困扰水平显著高于从未考虑离职的人员(p < 0.001)。接受过临终关怀培训的医护人员的平均道德困扰水平高于未接受此类培训的人员(p = 0.005)。
尽管不同职业的观点和经历可能存在差异,但道德困扰是临床医生的普遍经历。
道德困扰与职业倦怠和离职意愿相关。通过了解其根本原因,可以针对性地采取干预措施,以最大程度减少道德困扰,最终目标是提高患者护理质量、员工满意度并降低员工流失率。