Deak Eszter, Charlton Carmen L, Bobenchik April M, Miller Shelley A, Pollett Simon, McHardy Ian H, Wu Max T, Garner Omai B
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Jan;81(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.09.018. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
This study compared the diagnostic performance of Bruker's Microflex LT and bioMérieux's Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems. A total of 477 isolates were tested on both instruments. Discrepant results were resolved by sequencing. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between the proportion of isolates correctly identified, miscalled or not called by each instrument. Although both systems were good at identifying yeast (66/69 to species level), the confidence level was high only to genus level for 30% of the isolates on the Bruker. Both systems performed with high accuracy when evaluated solely on Food and Drug Administration-approved organisms for each database. A user-based assessment of the 2 instruments revealed an overall preference for the Vitek MS instrument.
本研究比较了布鲁克公司的Microflex LT和生物梅里埃公司的Vitek MS基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱系统的诊断性能。共对477株分离株在这两种仪器上进行了检测。通过测序解决了不一致的结果。总体而言,每种仪器正确鉴定、误判或未鉴定的分离株比例之间无统计学显著差异。虽然两个系统都擅长鉴定酵母(66/69株鉴定到种水平),但在布鲁克仪器上,30%的分离株仅在属水平上置信度较高。当仅对每个数据库中食品药品监督管理局批准的微生物进行评估时,两个系统的表现都具有很高的准确性。一项基于用户的对这两种仪器的评估显示,总体上更偏爱Vitek MS仪器。