Suppr超能文献

验证 iPad 视觉模拟评分系统评估食欲和饱腹感的有效性。

Validation of an iPad visual analogue rating system for assessing appetite and satiety.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK.

Nutrition Research, Leatherhead Food Research, Randalls Road, Leatherhead, Surrey KT22 7RY, UK.

出版信息

Appetite. 2015 Jan;84:259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.023. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

Abstract

The study aimed to validate appetite ratings made on a new electronic device, the Apple iPad Mini, against an existing but now obsolete electronic device (Hewlett Packard iPAQ). Healthy volunteers (9 men and 9 women) rated their appetite before and 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after consuming both a low energy (LE: 77 kcal) and high energy (HE: 274 kcal) beverage at breakfast on 2 non-consecutive days in counter-balanced order. Rated hunger, desire to eat and how much participants could consume was significantly lower after HE than LE on both devices, although there was better overall differentiation between HE and LE for ratings on iPad. Rated satiation and fullness, and a composite measure combining all five ratings, was significantly higher after HE than LE on both devices. There was also evidence that differences between conditions were more significant when analysed at each time point than using an overall area under the curve (AUC) measure. Overall, these data confirm that appetite ratings made using iPad are at least as sensitive as those on iPAQ, and offer a new platform for researchers to collect appetite data.

摘要

本研究旨在验证一种新型电子设备——苹果 iPad Mini 上的食欲评分与已过时的现有电子设备(惠普 iPAQ)之间的相关性。健康志愿者(9 名男性和 9 名女性)在早餐时分别摄入低能量(LE:77kcal)和高能量(HE:274kcal)饮料后,在 0、30、60、90 和 120 分钟时使用这两种设备对食欲进行了评分,并且在 2 天内以平衡方式进行了两次非连续的测试。在两种设备上,HE 后志愿者的饥饿感、进食欲望和可摄入食物量评分均明显低于 LE,但 iPad 上的 HE 和 LE 之间的总体差异更大。在两种设备上,HE 后饱腹感和满足感评分以及综合五个评分的复合测量值均明显高于 LE。还有证据表明,与使用整体曲线下面积(AUC)测量值相比,在每个时间点分析时,条件之间的差异更为显著。总的来说,这些数据证实使用 iPad 进行的食欲评分至少与 iPAQ 一样敏感,并为研究人员提供了一个收集食欲数据的新平台。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验