Rouse Matthew H, Goodman Sherryl H
Department of Psychology, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
Department of Psychology, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
Infant Behav Dev. 2014 Nov;37(4):739-51. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
Accumulating evidence suggests that antenatal depression predicts infants' negative affectivity, albeit with variable effect sizes. With a prospective longitudinal design, we sought to explain that variability by addressing questions about timing of the depression across pregnancy and the early postpartum, the role of high symptom levels relative to diagnosed depression, comorbidity with anxiety, and the potential mediating role of neuroendocrine functioning. Primiparous women (n=77) with histories of depression prior to pregnancy were assessed for cortisol levels monthly beginning by mid-pregnancy. Depression symptom levels and diagnostic status were similarly assessed monthly in pregnancy and also until infants reached three months of age, when mothers completed the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised to measure infant negative affectivity. Antenatal depression symptoms and infant negative affectivity were positively associated (r=.39). Controlling for depression symptom levels in other trimesters, only second trimester depression symptoms predicted higher infant negative affectivity (β=.44). With postpartum depression symptom levels in the model, only antenatal depression symptoms predicted infant negative affectivity (β=.45). In the context of depression, neither antenatal anxiety symptoms nor anxiety disorder diagnosis were associated with infant NA scores. The hypothesized role of elevated maternal cortisol as a mechanism for the association between antenatal depression and infant NA was not supported. Our findings contribute to efforts to more precisely identify infants of perinatally depressed mothers who are at greater risk for elevated negative affectivity, suggesting a window of vulnerability in mid pregnancy and the need for further study of potential mechanisms.
越来越多的证据表明,产前抑郁可预测婴儿的消极情感性,尽管效应大小存在差异。采用前瞻性纵向设计,我们试图通过解决以下问题来解释这种差异:孕期和产后早期抑郁的时间、相对于已确诊抑郁的高症状水平的作用、与焦虑的共病情况以及神经内分泌功能的潜在中介作用。对妊娠前有抑郁病史的初产妇(n = 77)从孕中期开始每月评估皮质醇水平。在孕期以及婴儿满三个月之前,每月同样评估抑郁症状水平和诊断状况,此时母亲完成修订版婴儿行为问卷以测量婴儿的消极情感性。产前抑郁症状与婴儿消极情感性呈正相关(r = 0.39)。控制其他孕期的抑郁症状水平后,只有孕中期的抑郁症状可预测更高的婴儿消极情感性(β = 0.44)。将产后抑郁症状水平纳入模型后,只有产前抑郁症状可预测婴儿消极情感性(β = 0.45)。在抑郁的背景下,产前焦虑症状和焦虑症诊断均与婴儿消极情感性得分无关。关于母亲皮质醇升高作为产前抑郁与婴儿消极情感性之间关联机制的假设未得到支持。我们的研究结果有助于更精确地识别围产期抑郁母亲的婴儿中消极情感性升高风险更高的婴儿,提示孕中期存在一个易损期,并需要进一步研究潜在机制。